In a sentenceA planet is approaching Earth and still nobody knows how to talk to a depressed person
Justine (Kirsten Dunst) is struggling with depression, while her sister Claire (Charlotte Gainsbourg) confronts the possibility of a disaster neither can control. At a country house, they face the threat of a planet approaching Earth. The prospect of a collision gives the sisters a shared danger, though it does not give them a shared way of facing it. Lars von Trier writes and directs this drama about depression and the possible end of the world, with Kiefer Sutherland as John, Alexander Skarsgård as Michael and Cameron Spurr as Leo.
Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.
Kirsten Dunst and Charlotte Gainsbourg make Lars von Trier’s apocalyptic drama painfully intimate. The middle lingers too long, but the performances make its depiction of depression worth the discomfort.
Lars von Trier’s Melancholia makes depression painfully recognisable within a story about a planet approaching Earth. We recommend it, with a warning that the middle prolongs the misery beyond what the drama can support. The science-fiction premise gives the characters something enormous to fear. Von Trier’s interest is in how they bear that fear, and in the difficulty of understanding distress that looks different from their own.
Kirsten Dunst plays Justine with a withdrawal that can make her difficult company, and does not apologise for it. We found her painful to watch: in the close-ups, the effort of responding to other people seems almost beyond her. An ordinary exchange can look exhausting when the feeling that should come with it has gone, and Dunst makes us register that work. Her performance does not offer the comforting assurance that a sufficiently sympathetic person could simply talk Justine out of this.
Charlotte Gainsbourg’s Claire is essential because the film needs more than one convincing response to danger. The sisters do not experience the threat in the same way, and Gainsbourg makes Claire’s anxiety urgent and recognisable. She is not there merely to help us understand her sister. Von Trier risks making depression look like a superior kind of knowledge, but Gainsbourg makes it hard to dismiss Claire simply because she is frightened.
Cinematographer Manuel Alberto Claro sets the careful compositions of the opening montage against shaky close-ups. The close-ups work especially well: they let us study small changes in expression while the camera keeps moving. Jette Lehmann’s production design uses the country-house setting to keep the drama domestic when the threat could hardly be larger. The rooms give the sisters places to be apart without letting the film lose sight of either of them.
Wagner’s music gives the opening a grandeur that would be excessive in a smaller story, and the film earns that scale. Editor Molly Malene Stensgaard allows the later scenes enough time for discomfort to become hard to escape. The trouble is that the middle keeps going after we have understood what that discomfort means. We begin waiting for a scene to add something rather than deepen a gloom already established. Von Trier’s screenplay occasionally makes the wait harder with dialogue that sounds written to explain an attitude instead of spoken to another person.
The critical consensus is much cooler than our verdict, with much of the objection centred on remote characters and prolonged gloom. We think those reviews undervalue the work Dunst and Gainsbourg do in making that gloom specific to two people. As science fiction, the film is unusually prepared to hold on a face when it could be explaining the danger or supplying another spectacle. The pacing needs work, but we cared about these women too much to find the film empty.
Give it an evening when there is room for something difficult. Its 136 minutes are best taken without distractions, particularly when little appears to be happening. We would leave a little quiet afterwards rather than go straight in search of something cheerful.
The consensus on Melancholia is sharply divided, though praise for its images extends well beyond its admirers. The opening montage draws particular attention, and even several negative reviews acknowledge the force of the filmmaking and music. Kirsten Dunst’s performance is another frequent source of praise, with Charlotte Gainsbourg also singled out. Supporters find the apocalyptic treatment of depression intimate, sincere and unexpectedly moving rather than merely bleak.
The main disagreement is over whether that visual and emotional ambition sustains a drama. Reservations cluster around sluggish pacing, thin characters, awkward dialogue and a sense that the symbolism offers too little insight. Some critics admire Dunst but find her difficult to connect with. The Wrap notably recommends the film to people who dislike von Trier’s earlier work; The Hollywood Reporter finds the images and music impressive but the characters and ideas unengaging. The spread reflects a substantial disagreement about the film’s emotional reach.
The critic praises the audacious mix of silliness and solemnity, beautiful filmmaking, and strong performances in this science-fiction take on von Trier's recurring themes, though it may not win over the unconverted.
Read the full review →The critic calls it von Trier’s most hopeful and beautiful film, lush and romantic even in its apocalyptic hopelessness, with a luminous central performance by Kirsten Dunst. Its excessive yet restrained vision is strangely forgiving.
Read the full review →The review notes the film's polished depiction of depression and striking visuals but finds the middle section overly focused on the protagonist's gloom, making it low-key overall despite committed acting.
Read the full review →The film is seen as therapy disguised as drama with a disconnect between concept and execution; von Trier swings for the fence but misses in this autobiographical depression allegory.
Read the full review →The critic finds von Trier's apocalyptic vision visually striking but undermined by awkward dialogue and an air of unreality, with the film's misanthropy providing some engagement despite its flaws.
Read the full review →The film peaks with its dazzling prelude but the rest is redundant with few insights; symbolism flounders and characters remain superficial ciphers reflecting the director's nihilism.
Read the full review →
Safe · not reviewed yetAnother retreat from ordinary life, with illness making familiar surroundings feel quietly hostile.
The Sacrifice · not reviewed yetA household faces possible annihilation, with room for faith, fear and difficult silences.
Last Night · not reviewed yetThe end of the world leaves ordinary people making awkward, recognisable choices.
Take ShelterDread enters a family home, and certainty becomes something nobody can afford.
The Green Ray · not reviewed yetFor another woman struggling to feel what everyone insists she should.
Free account
Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.
