Ghostface standing in an empty hospital hallway
Film review

Scream

2022 · Directed by Tyler Gillett, Matt Bettinelli-Olpin · 1h 54m · MPA R

In a sentenceGhostface has read the fan forums and would like to discuss them with you at knifepoint

Woodsboro, a generation after the murders of 1996. Tara Carpenter (Jenna Ortega) is home alone when the house phone rings and a stranger’s voice asks about scary films; the front door locks itself and a figure in a Ghostface mask attacks her. She survives, and her estranged older sister Sam Carpenter (Melissa Barrera) returns to town with her boyfriend Richie Kirsch (Jack Quaid), carrying a secret that ties her to the original killings. Tara’s friends, among them the twins Chad and Mindy Meeks-Martin (Mason Gooding, Jasmin Savoy Brown) and Wes Hicks (Dylan Minnette), begin working out who the killer wants next. Sam turns to the former sheriff Dewey Riley (David Arquette), who tells her to leave, then calls Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell) and Gale Weathers (Courteney Cox) to warn them.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

The fifth Scream is a bloody, well-built slasher with a fine opening and a David Arquette we did not expect, wrapped in so much talk about sequels that it forgets to be frightening. Worth it for the kills, if you can sit through the seminar.

Twenty-six years after Wes Craven’s original, Ghostface is back in Woodsboro. This fifth Scream, directed by Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett from a script by James Vanderbilt and Guy Busick, is a decent slasher with a first-rate opening, kills nasty enough to earn its 18 certificate, and one performance that caught us off guard. It is also a film that stops every ten minutes to tell you what kind of film it is, and by the second hour we had heard enough.

The opening is the best thing in it. Tara Carpenter (Jenna Ortega) is alone in a large suburban kitchen when the house phone rings, and the voice on the line asks her favourite scary film. She says she prefers the sort of horror that has themes and names The Babadook, and we laughed, because the film knows exactly which of its viewers it is teasing. Then the voice starts describing her house, the front door locks itself, and we stopped laughing. Brett Jutkiewicz shoots the house in warm lamplight with the dark held just outside the glass, and the attack, when it comes, is long, close and ugly.

Then the film starts talking. Sam Carpenter (Melissa Barrera), Tara’s estranged older sister, comes back to town with her boyfriend Richie Kirsch (Jack Quaid), and Tara’s friends gather to work out who wants them dead. Mindy Meeks-Martin (Jasmin Savoy Brown), the group’s film obsessive, lays out the rules: this is a requel, not a sequel or a reboot, and the killer will go after anyone connected to the murders of 1996. It is a good speech, and it is also the studio explaining why it made the film. Vanderbilt and Busick return to the idea again and again, with jokes about angry fans and the film-within-the-film Stab, and each time it is a little less funny. Around the hour mark we stopped enjoying the joke and started waiting for the next knife.

The new cast is uneven. Ortega is the find: she spends most of the film in a hospital bed and still makes Tara the one person we worried about. Barrera has the harder job, a heroine with a secret she cannot say out loud, and she plays it as a single note of clenched anxiety the script never lets her vary. Mason Gooding, as Mindy’s twin Chad, and Mikey Madison, as Amber, the friend Tara was texting when the phone rang, get a trait each and not much more. Dylan Minnette’s Wes gets one long sequence in a kitchen, built from open doors and a running shower, that is the film’s best piece of staging.

David Arquette is the surprise. Dewey Riley has left the sheriff’s office and lives alone in a trailer with a drink to hand, watching Gale Weathers (Courteney Cox) present breakfast television from a long way off, and Arquette plays him without any of the old comedy: a man stabbed too many times for too little thanks, and aware of it. When Sam turns up asking for help and he tells her to get out of town, we felt something we had not expected from this series, which was sadness. Sidney Prescott arrives late, calm and capable, and the film gives her little to do except be Sidney Prescott.

The killing is done properly. Ghostface has always been a clumsy murderer, tripping over furniture and taking kicks to the head, and the directors keep that, but the knife goes in more often and deeper than before, and Michel Aller holds on the wounds where an earlier film would have cut away. Chad Keith gives Woodsboro open-plan kitchens and glass doors, every room with three ways in. Brian Tyler and Boys Noize put an electronic pulse under the orchestral stabs, and it does its job without our noticing, which for a slasher is praise.

Craven’s film was sharp about the rules because it was also frightened of them; the jokes came from people who thought they might die anyway. This one is sharper and less frightened. See it in a cinema if you can, with a crowd that shouts at the screen; at home the kills still land but the speeches land harder, and you will find yourself answering back. Bring someone who has seen the first four. It runs 114 minutes and carries an 18.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

67
Positive
18
Mixed
4
Negative
3

Most critics are pleased to have Ghostface back. Eighteen of the twenty-five reviews are positive, and the praise gathers in the same places: the running joke about requels and toxic fandom, which many find sharper than expected, and the kills, which several find bloodier than before. Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett are credited with keeping the pace up and the tone steady. Melissa Barrera and Jenna Ortega are well received, and David Arquette’s return draws warm notices even from reviewers who like little else.

The reservations cluster around familiarity. Several of the positive reviews concede the film treads old ground, and the sceptics push that further: the self-reference wears thin, the scares are few, and the legacy characters sit awkwardly beside the newcomers. The spread is wide. The New York Times, The Hollywood Reporter and The Times all find it smug and fright-free, and The Times objects to its digs at films such as Hereditary.

The Guardian
16 January 2022
90*

The critic calls it the smartest, funniest and stabbiest Scream since the 1996 original, praising how it harnesses fan fury as a plot device in this requel mixing heritage characters with new blood. They note it revamps the formula of knowing references and tropes for a new generation but feel the franchise has come full circle.

Read the full review →
Empire
12 January 2022 · Ben Travis
80*

The directors deliver a worthy legacy sequel that keeps the spirit of the franchise alive with fresh twists and strong kills. It is fast, funny and ferocious as a Scream movie should be.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
14 January 2022 · ★★★★
80

The critic praises the strong new ensemble and pointed commentary on toxic fandom and Hollywood, calling it the strongest Scream in years despite some familiar ground.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
12 January 2022 · B · Jude Dry
77

The overly self-referential film delivers a satisfyingly scary franchise continuation with returning stars Neve Campbell, Courteney Cox, and David Arquette.

Read the full review →
Total Film
12 January 2022 · Jamie Graham
75*

Directors Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett craft a slick entry that understands the series’ mix of slickness and sickness. The franchise isn’t ready to die yet.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
13 January 2022 · Katie Walsh
70*

The new installment is even bloodier and just as winking and self-aware as its predecessors, delivering classic self-aware chills while updating the franchise with debates on elevated horror and requels. It passes the torch effectively to new leads like Melissa Barrera amid strong bloody violence and meta commentary.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Scream worth watching?
Scream (2022) is worth watching for slasher fans who want the kills done properly and can put up with a great deal of talk about sequels, and we scored it 66. The opening attack on Jenna Ortega's Tara is first-rate and David Arquette's worn-down Dewey surprised us, but the film keeps stopping to explain what kind of film it is, and by the second hour we had heard enough.
How long is Scream, and what is it rated?
Scream runs 1h 54m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a horror and mystery film.
Where can I watch Scream in the US?
Scream is streaming on Netflix, Apple TV, Amazon Prime Video and The Roku Channel in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from $5.99. It leaves Netflix on 8 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Scream, and is it suitable for children?
Scream (2022) carries an 18 certificate in the UK and earns it: the knife goes in more often and deeper than in the earlier films, and the editing holds on the wounds where a previous instalment would have cut away. It is not suitable for children, and the squeamish should know the attacks are long, close and ugly, though the frights between them are thinner than the gore.
How does Scream compare to Scream 4?
Scream (2022) is the bloodier and better-built of the two, with kills that land harder than anything in Scream 4 and a stronger middle section. Scream 4 has the sharper opening and last twenty minutes but sags into an hour of deputies sitting in cars, while the newer film's weakness is talk rather than slack: it explains itself far more than it frightens. Pick the 2022 film for the violence, the 2011 one for the jokes.
Do you need to have seen the other Scream films before Scream?
Scream (2022) does not stand alone: it is built around the murders of 1996 and the return of Sidney Prescott, Gale Weathers and Dewey Riley, and much of its dialogue is about the earlier films. The plot can be followed cold, but the jokes, the sadness of Arquette's performance and the killer's motives all depend on knowing the first film at least. We would not start here.
What should I watch after Scream?
After Scream, try Scream (1996, Fi1m 86): Craven’s original, where the rules were new and the jokes came from fear. Then Halloween (2018, Fi1m 88): The other legacy sequel, quieter about its own machinery and stronger for it.
What order should I watch the Scream films in?
Release order is the safe choice for Scream, and it is the order our collection page lists them in. Scream is number 5 of the 7 Scream titles on Fi1m; before it comes Scream 4 and after it Scream VI. The full order.

Part of · 5 of 7

Scream

7 films on Fi1m · 1996–2026 · average 64 · best Scream 86

All 7 in order

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Scream (1996, Fi1m 86)Craven’s original, where the rules were new and the jokes came from fear.

  2. Tenebrae (1982) · not reviewed yetArgento’s giallo about a writer stalked by a reader; the same mirror, better lit.

  3. Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon (2006) · not reviewed yetA mockumentary follows a slasher preparing his debut; funnier than it has any right to be.

  4. Ready or Not (2019) · not reviewed yetBettinelli-Olpin and Gillett’s earlier film: a wedding night, a hide-and-seek game, plenty of blood.

  5. Halloween (2018, Fi1m 88)The other legacy sequel, quieter about its own machinery and stronger for it.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever