Five samurai gathered in pouring rain on muddy ground with one kneeling
Film review

Seven Samurai

1954 · Directed by Akira Kurosawa · 3h 27m · MPA NR

In a sentenceSeven men work for nothing and make most action heroes look overpaid

A village threatened by bandits seeks protection from samurai who have no master. Kambei Shimada (Takashi Shimura) leads the effort to bring seven warriors together, with Kikuchiyo (Toshirō Mifune) among the men drawn into the undertaking. The company also includes Gorobei Katayama (Yoshio Inaba) and Kyuzo (Seiji Miyaguchi). For the villagers, the arrangement means entrusting their safety to men from a different class; for the warriors, it means taking on a fight without pay. Akira Kurosawa directs this story of recruitment, honour and a community seeking help against armed attackers.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Akira Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai earns its 207 minutes by making the recruitment as absorbing as the fighting. Mifune can be overemphatic, but we would recommend this humane, exciting adventure to almost anyone.

An action film can spend a long time putting a team together and still leave us unable to tell its members apart. Seven Samurai gives the job the attention it deserves. Akira Kurosawa makes the recruitment of warriors to protect a village from bandits a pleasure in itself, with each addition changing our sense of the company. We would recommend it even to people who usually find sword fights a reason to look elsewhere. At 207 minutes, it asks for an evening and makes good use of it.

The screenplay, by Kurosawa, Shinobu Hashimoto and Hideo Oguni, takes the villagers’ need seriously. These masterless samurai agree to fight without pay, and the question of what makes that worth doing gives the gathering of the men its interest. The film gives us time to think about why each man might agree to help. Class matters, too, because the people seeking protection and the people providing it do not begin as equals.

Takashi Shimura’s Kambei Shimada makes leadership look like something that requires thought. His steadiness gives us someone to trust while the group is taking shape, and he makes authority seem possible without constant displays of force. We were moved by the seriousness he brings to the villagers’ need for help. The care he gives to assembling the company makes their predicament feel urgent without requiring him to play every moment as an emergency.

Toshirō Mifune’s Kikuchiyo supplies a different sort of energy, vigorous enough to threaten to take over the picture. The performance is large, theatrical and often funny, and Mifune makes the company feel less settled whenever he is its centre. Some of this is too emphatic for our taste. Kurosawa occasionally lets a performance keep insisting on a point we have already understood, and the extra emphasis can be tiring. Even then, the individual men remain recognisable; nobody disappears into the general category of useful swordsman.

Asakazu Nakai’s photography gives the action a clarity that makes the size of a battle count. We can attend to an individual fighter without losing the sense of other people fighting around him, so the fighting remains legible even with many bodies in motion. Kurosawa also edits, and his cutting allows the sword duels and the mass battles to demand different kinds of attention. The close contest needs us alert to each decision; the larger fight needs us aware that no one man can control all of it. Fumio Hayasaka’s score adds to the excitement of the fighting, though Nakai’s photography and Kurosawa’s cutting do more to keep us alert.

Its team-building story has been borrowed often, and The Magnificent Seven remakes it outright. Familiarity with that sort of plot need not blunt the pleasure of seeing men considered for a dangerous job, because Kurosawa makes us interested in the choices. The patience distinguishes it from action films that hurry through the introductions to get to the fighting. Give it an uninterrupted evening, even if swordsmen are not usually your choice of company.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

92
Positive
12
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are unanimous, and have been since the film first opened: twelve notices, all positive, none below the mid-eighties. Most critics praise the same three things. Kurosawa’s handling of the action, above all the final battle in the rain, is repeatedly said to have changed how fights are filmed. The characterisation of each of the seven is singled out as unusually precise for a film this large, with Toshiro Mifune’s Kikuchiyo the performance named most often and Takashi Shimura’s leader close behind.

Disagreement is hard to find. Nobody raises a structural complaint; the runtime, over three hours, is mentioned mostly to note that it passes quickly. What separates the reviews is tone rather than verdict: Variety in 1953 treats it as a solid adventure film, while later critics write about a foundational text. The Financial Times, in a broader piece on Kurosawa, is the most restrained, and even that is warm.

Time Out
23 September 2024 · ★★★★★ · RM
100

Kurosawa's masterpiece, influenced by John Ford and remade as The Magnificent Seven, follows masterless samurai protecting a village from bandits for no pay. The individual characterisations are precise and memorable, especially Takashi Shimura as the sage leader, and the epic action scenes remain without peer.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2011 · Kim Newman
95*

The critic calls it a true masterpiece that invented the team-assembly device now common in action films and features perhaps the greatest battle in cinema. Kurosawa's direction of sword duels and mass battles changed how action scenes are shot, with rich characterisation for each of the seven samurai.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
19 August 2001 · Roger Ebert
95*

Ebert calls it a great film in its own right and the source of an entire genre of team-assemble mission movies. He singles out Kurosawa’s clear storytelling, sharply defined characters, and thrilling action sequences with sweeping camera work as standout elements.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
3 September 2006 · Susan King
90*

Kurosawa’s telling of the tale is masterly, with all elements aligning to make it a flawless piece of cinema. The direction, screenplay, performances, music, cinematography and production design are beyond reproach, and the epic moves at a breakneck pace even at over three hours.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
14 November 2024 · Chuck Bowen
90*

The critic hails the film as a transcendent masterpiece of popular art and a Rosetta stone of modern action cinema that remains viscerally alive and timeless decades later. They single out Toshiro Mifune’s layered, explosive performance as Kikuchiyo and Kurosawa’s masterful balance of kinetic set pieces, character depth, and humanistic wisdom.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
27 October 2021 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The critic calls Kurosawa’s film an enduring epic primal myth of mercenaries hired to defend a village, one that has influenced countless later movies while retaining its own power and magic. They single out the vigorous, theatrical energy and flair of the action sequences and performances, especially those of Takashi Shimura and Toshiro Mifune.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Seven Samurai worth watching?
Seven Samurai is worth watching for almost anyone willing to give it an uninterrupted evening, and we scored it 95. Kurosawa makes the recruitment of the seven warriors as absorbing as the fighting, so its 207 minutes are earned rather than endured. Mifune's Kikuchiyo can be too emphatic, and that is our only real reservation.
How long is Seven Samurai, and what is it rated?
Seven Samurai runs 3h 27m and is rated NR by the MPA in the US. It is an action and drama film.
Where can I watch Seven Samurai in the US?
Seven Samurai is streaming on HBO Max, Tubi, Pluto TV and Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. It leaves HBO Max on 30 September. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Seven Samurai compare to The Wages of Fear?
Seven Samurai is the warmer and more expansive of the two, while The Wages of Fear is the harder and more frightening. Both are about dangerous work forcing strangers to depend on one another, but Kurosawa spends his time on the men and the village they protect, and Clouzot spends his on a truck full of nitroglycerine. Choose Kurosawa for humane adventure, Clouzot for sustained dread.
What should I watch after Seven Samurai?
After Seven Samurai, try The Wages of Fear (1953, Fi1m 90): Dangerous work makes strangers depend on one another, with little room for vanity. Then A Bug's Life (1998, Fi1m 73): A community hires protection and gets rather less expertise than it expected.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1957

Nominated
Best Art Direction, Black and White
Nominated
Best Costume Design, Black-and-White

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Magnificent Seven (1960) · not reviewed yetThe village-defence story moves west, with a different balance of personalities.

  2. 13 Assassins (2010) · not reviewed yetAnother band of swordsmen, with patient preparation and a much harsher temper.

  3. The Wages of Fear (1953, Fi1m 90)Dangerous work makes strangers depend on one another, with little room for vanity.

  4. Lagaan (2001) · not reviewed yetA threatened village assembles a team, and cricket becomes a matter of survival.

  5. A Bug's Life (1998, Fi1m 73)A community hires protection and gets rather less expertise than it expected.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever