Spider-Man (Tom Holland) standing on a platform as a train passes nearby
Film review

Spider-Man: Homecoming

2017 · Directed by Jon Watts · 2h 13m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceA fifteen-year-old with superpowers and a chaperone, and the film is best whenever the chaperone is out of earshot

Queens. Eight years after an alien army wrecked Manhattan, salvage contractor Adrian Toomes (Michael Keaton) loses the clean-up job to a federal agency and keeps the alien hardware he has collected. Fifteen-year-old Peter Parker (Tom Holland), back from Berlin with Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.), wants to be an Avenger and is told to stick to his neighbourhood. He quits the academic decathlon team, stops bicycle thieves, gives an old woman directions, and waits for Stark’s minder Happy Hogan (Jon Favreau) to answer his texts. At Midtown School of Science and Technology his friend Ned (Jacob Batalon) works out his secret, Liz (Laura Harrier) does not notice him, and Michelle (Zendaya) watches everything. Then Peter interrupts a cash-machine robbery carried out with weapons nobody on Earth should own.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Jon Watts’s reboot works best as a school comedy, with Tom Holland as a Peter Parker who is late for everything and Michael Keaton as a villain with a mortgage. The action gets murkier the higher it climbs, and Tony Stark keeps wandering in.

This is the third attempt at Spider-Man in fifteen years and the first made inside the Marvel machine, which is why Tony Stark keeps turning up. Jon Watts, whose previous film Cop Car got its tension from two small boys who did not understand what they had stolen, has been handed a fifteen-year-old with superpowers and a budget to match. Six writers share the screenplay credit and the film feels like it: a school comedy for an hour, a heist picture for twenty minutes and a Marvel film whenever somebody remembers. The school comedy is the good part. We enjoyed it, we would recommend it to anyone fond of the character or under seventeen, and we lost track of the last ten minutes of the action because the film did not let us see it.

Tom Holland is the reason the school scenes work. His Peter Parker is small, quick, late for everything and unable to stop talking, and Holland plays him as a boy far more frightened of Liz (Laura Harrier) than of anyone holding a gun. Ned (Jacob Batalon), who finds out the secret early and treats it as the best thing that has ever happened to him, gives Holland someone to babble at. Zendaya’s Michelle sits at the back of every room with a book and one dry line per scene. Watts shoots the corridors of Midtown School of Science and Technology the way American teen films have since the eighties, lockers and a decathlon team and a homecoming dance, and does not pretend to be doing anything cleverer.

Michael Keaton’s Adrian Toomes is the best thing in the film after Holland, and he is good because he is ordinary. He runs a salvage yard. He has a crew, a mortgage and a grievance against Stark, and Oliver Scholl’s production design gives him a hangar where alien hardware is stacked next to pallets and forklifts, so the wonders look like stock. Keaton barely raises his voice. There is a conversation in a car late on that we will not describe, in which he says nothing openly threatening, and we went cold; it was the calm, and the way he kept his eyes on the road.

Salvatore Totino shoots Queens in flat, ordinary daylight, and that is the right call: the suit looks like something a boy would be embarrassed to be caught in, and the neighbourhood has laundrettes and delis rather than backdrops. Louise Frogley’s costumes make the same point. Peter’s own outfit is a hoodie, tracksuit bottoms and goggles; the one Stark gives him is a piece of equipment, and the film is honest that it is also a leash. Michael Giacchino opens with a full orchestra playing the theme from the 1960s cartoon and sets the tone in twenty seconds. Dan Lebental and Debbie Berman cut the first scenes as Peter’s own phone footage, shaky and delighted, and it is the most confident editing in the film.

The trouble starts when it leaves the ground. Robert Downey Jr.’s Stark drops in to scold, and each time he does the film stops being about a boy in Queens and starts being about a franchise. Jon Favreau’s Happy Hogan, ignoring Peter’s texts, is funnier and does the same job. A sequence at the Washington Monument, with Ned and the decathlon team stuck in a lift, is built one beat at a time, and we sat forward through all of it because we could see exactly how far Peter had to climb and how little time he had. The climax is a fight in the dark against a man in a flying suit, and Lebental and Berman cut it so fast that we could not tell which figure was falling.

Against the character’s own record it sits below Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 2, which had a sadder hero and a clearer plot, and above the two Marc Webb films, which had neither. At 133 minutes it is longer than any school comedy needs to be. Most critics have been a shade warmer than we are, mostly because they forgave the last twenty minutes. Marisa Tomei’s May Parker is written largely as a joke about being attractive, and Liz is a girl to be looked at across a corridor; neither gets a scene in the first hour that is about her.

Watch it with a teenager if you have one to hand. They will not mind the plane, and you can enjoy the school day while they explain what a Chitauri is.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

75
Positive
20
Mixed
3
Negative
1

Most critics like it, and the praise clusters in two places: Tom Holland’s Peter Parker and the decision to keep the story small. The reviews keep returning to the high-school comedy, the Queens setting and the lack of the angst that weighed down earlier versions; John Hughes is the comparison several reach for. Michael Keaton’s Vulture is the other name that recurs, singled out as one of the series’ more grounded villains.

The reservations gather around the Marvel machinery. The Hollywood Reporter finds the film too tightly bound to the wider franchise and blames a crowded script; Variety calls the approach rote and the hero innocuous. Even admirers at Time Out and Den of Geek concede the bigger action sequences blur, and NME notes the female characters are underused. The one outright dissent is The New Yorker, which finds it saccharine and oddly fond of the military hardware it might have questioned. For a film this well liked, the spread is wide.

Radio Times
30 June 2017 · ★★★★★
100

The critic hails it as among the very best of the Marvel bunch for its keenly observed high-school comedy and brilliantly constructed body with no wasted frames. It singles out Tom Holland's nuanced performance as the web-like glue holding the action and teen drama together.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
29 June 2017 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The critic calls the film a crowd-pleasing triumph and a whip-smart teen movie, crediting Tom Holland's charming central performance. They single out the self-contained storytelling, Michael Keaton's nuanced Vulture and the focus on high-school life for praise.

Read the full review →
Total Film
30 June 2017 · 4 stars · Jamie Graham
90*

The critic finds the film exuberant and fun, with Holland delivering a delightful, athletic take on Peter Parker that makes the high-school superhero story feel fresh and engaging. It highlights the zinging gags, strong character moments and overall sense that Spidey has a spring in his step again.

Read the full review →
Empire
29 June 2017 · Nick de Semlyen
85*

The review calls it the best Spider-Man film since Raimi’s Spider-Man 2, crediting Tom Holland’s endearing performance and Jon Watts’ light touch for ditching angst in favor of a cool, funny remix that feels fresh. It singles out the small-scale high-school moments and witty action sequences for praise.

Read the full review →
Vulture
5 July 2017
85*

The critic calls it the breeziest, most convivial Marvel movie in ages, praising its friendly-neighborhood focus, witty action, and strong performances especially from Tom Holland and Michael Keaton. It returns to simpler superheroics without heavy angst.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
16 November 2017 · Charlotte O'Sullivan
80*

The critic praises the reboot as irreverent, intimate and wrenching, highlighting its debt to Buffy the Vampire Slayer and strong ensemble performances, especially Tom Holland as a winsome yet hard-scrabble Peter Parker. The high-school setting, sharp humor and focus on Peter and his friends stand out as particular strengths.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Spider-Man: Homecoming worth watching?
Spider-Man: Homecoming is worth watching for anyone fond of the character or under seventeen, and we scored it 74. The school comedy is the good part: Tom Holland's Peter Parker is late for everything and Michael Keaton's villain has a mortgage. The action gets murkier the higher it climbs, and Tony Stark keeps wandering in.
How long is Spider-Man: Homecoming, and what is it rated?
Spider-Man: Homecoming runs 2h 13m and is rated PG-13 by the MPA in the US. It is an action and adventure film.
Where can I watch Spider-Man: Homecoming in the US?
Spider-Man: Homecoming is streaming on Disney+ and Netflix in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from $3.99. It leaves Netflix on 1 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Spider-Man: Homecoming, and is it suitable for children?
Spider-Man: Homecoming is a 12A, and the violence is fights with alien weapons, a bank robbery and a climax in the dark, with little blood. The one scene that chilled us is a quiet conversation in a car, which small children will miss and teenagers will feel. It suits anyone from about ten upwards; the squeamish have nothing to fear.
How does Spider-Man: Homecoming compare to Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse?
Spider-Man: Homecoming is the more ordinary of the two, a live-action school comedy in flat Queens daylight, while Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse is drawn, funnier and more interested in how comic books look. The animated film is the better one, and the one we would choose for most evenings. Homecoming wins only if you want Holland, Keaton and a Marvel setting.
What should I watch after Spider-Man: Homecoming?
After Spider-Man: Homecoming, try Spider-Man 2 (2004, Fi1m 85): Raimi’s best: a hero who wants to quit, and a villain who is sorry. Then Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (2018, Fi1m 87): The same boy-in-a-city idea, drawn rather than filmed, and funnier about it; and The Breakfast Club (1985, Fi1m 75): Five teenagers in a library with no powers; the corridors this film is copying.

Cast

Awards

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie, 2018

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie

If you liked this, try…

  1. Spider-Man 2 (2004, Fi1m 85)Raimi’s best: a hero who wants to quit, and a villain who is sorry.

  2. Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (2018, Fi1m 87)The same boy-in-a-city idea, drawn rather than filmed, and funnier about it.

  3. The Breakfast Club (1985, Fi1m 75)Five teenagers in a library with no powers; the corridors this film is copying.

  4. Attack the Block (2011, Fi1m 84)A south London estate, aliens, and teenagers who do not wait for a mentor.

  5. Cop Car (2015) · not reviewed yetWatts before the budget: two boys, a stolen police car and Kevin Bacon.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever