Heller (Rami Malek) in a hooded jacket watches the street beside parked cars
Film review

The Amateur

2025 · Directed by James Hawes · 2h 03m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceHe cannot shoot, so he hacks, and the film mistakes a working laptop for suspense

Charlie Heller (Rami Malek) breaks codes for the CIA from a desk and has never been in a fight. His wife Sarah (Rachel Brosnahan) is killed in London, and the men who did it are still walking around. Heller wants them dead. Director Moore (Holt McCallany) tells him to go home and grieve; Caleb (Danny Sapani) tells him the field is for field officers. He does neither, and instead makes himself enough of a problem for his employers that Moore agrees to have him trained. Henderson (Laurence Fishburne) draws the job of teaching a man who cannot make himself fire a gun at a paper target, let alone a person. Then Heller flies to Europe alone, with a laptop, a list of names and no backup, and starts looking.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Rami Malek’s grieving code-breaker is an interesting man to hand a gun to, and one rooftop set piece justifies the trip. Around it, Ken Nolan and Gary Spinelli’s script gives him every answer a password away, and revenge with no risk is just travel.

James Hawes has made a spy thriller from Robert Littell’s novel in which the hero cannot do the one thing spy heroes do. Charlie Heller (Rami Malek) breaks codes for the CIA and has never been in a fight. When his wife is killed in London he wants the men responsible dead, and the film’s one idea, which is a good one, is to ask what a clever, frightened man does with that wish. For about forty minutes The Amateur takes the question seriously. Then Ken Nolan and Gary Spinelli’s script starts answering it for him, and the answers all arrive through a screen.

Malek is an odd fit and mostly a useful one. He plays Heller as a man embarrassed by his own body, shoulders up, eyes on the floor, a voice that sounds as if it is asking permission. It works on the shooting range, where Laurence Fishburne’s Henderson watches him miss a target at ten paces and tells him, without malice, that he will never be a killer. It works less well at the graveside. We felt more for Heller when he could not pull a trigger than when he lost his wife, because the film gives Rachel Brosnahan’s Sarah a handful of scenes before it needs her gone, and we had not had time to miss her.

Fishburne is the best thing in it. He plays Henderson as a tired professional who has trained better men than this and buried some of them, and every scene he shares with Malek has a weight the rest of the film lacks. Holt McCallany’s Director Moore is a slab of a man who lies without blinking, which is all the part asks of him. Julianne Nicholson, Michael Stuhlbarg, Caitríona Balfe and Jon Bernthal are all here and none of them is given more than a scene or two that matters. Bernthal in particular turns up, is interesting for ten minutes, and is put away.

The film looks expensive in the right way. Martin Ruhe shoots real streets in flat grey daylight, and Maria Djurkovic gives the agency a basement of humming servers and strip light that looks like somewhere people work. Hauschka’s score is mostly piano and low strings, and it stays quiet while Heller is thinking, which is often. Jonathan Amos cuts the surveillance sequences so we can follow what Heller is looking at and why, which is harder than it sounds. And there is one set piece, on a rooftop in Berlin, involving a swimming pool with a glass floor and a man standing on it, that made us flinch and then sit forward. We will not say how it ends. It is the only stretch of the film in which Heller’s cleverness costs him anything, and it is over quickly.

The trouble is the laptop. Heller cannot fight, so the script gives him the whole connected world instead: every camera, every door, every bank account, opened in a few keystrokes with nobody on the other side pushing back. Once a film lets its hero do that, nothing is difficult, and we could feel the tension drain out of it scene by scene. We stopped worrying for him somewhere around the second city, and we did not start again. The 12A certificate does not help. People die in this film and it barely leaves a mark on anyone, Heller included.

The Amateur has almost no jokes, and the seriousness sits awkwardly on a plot this far-fetched. The best films about desk men sent into the field make them prey, and keep them prey. Heller is never prey. He is hunted, technically, but the hunters are so slow and he is so well informed that we never once believed he might lose.

Most critics landed about where we have, and we understand the split. At 123 minutes it does not overstay, and if you like Malek and have a taste for the well-tailored European thriller it will fill an evening without insulting you. You will remember the pool. Given a week, you may struggle to remember much else.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

52
Positive
5
Mixed
8
Negative
9
The Hollywood Reporter
8 April 2025 · David Rooney
70*

Rooney finds the implausible revenge thriller entertaining and a welcome throwback to glossy adult action films. He praises the lively action sequences and clever use of technology, while noting that the plot stretches credibility.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page could not be accessed, so its verdict is unavailable. No praise or complaint can be verified from the supplied text.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
10 April 2025
64*

The page could not be read, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. No praise or complaint can be identified from the accessible content.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
8 April 2025 · C+ · David Ehrlich
63

Ehrlich finds the spy thriller neither fun nor dull, with its uneven mix of seriousness and absurdity. He praises Rami Malek’s portrayal of Charlie’s growing confidence and discomfort, as well as the film’s location shooting.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
8 April 2025 · C+ · Jesse Hassenger
63

The critic finds the thriller professionally made but hollow, generic, and short on substance. They praise its real-world location work, while noting the supporting cast never gets enough to do.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
8 April 2025 · ★★½/4 · Gregory Nussen
62

Nussen finds the film a pleasurable but imperfect throwback, with muddled political implications. He praises its sustained corkscrew tension and Malek’s quivering intensity.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Amateur worth watching?
The Amateur is worth watching only if you like Rami Malek and have an evening to spare for a handsome, low-stakes European thriller, and we scored it 54. Laurence Fishburne and one rooftop set piece in Berlin earn their keep; the rest hands the hero every answer through his laptop, and we stopped worrying for him early.
How long is The Amateur, and what is it rated?
The Amateur runs 2h 03m and is rated PG-13 by the MPA in the US. It is a thriller and action film.
Where can I watch The Amateur in the US?
The Amateur is streaming on Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The Amateur, and is it suitable for children?
The Amateur is a 12A, and it plays like one: people die, but the film barely lingers on it, and there is little blood or fear to speak of. It is fine for most teenagers and unlikely to trouble the squeamish. Younger children would simply be bored by two hours of a man staring at screens.
How does The Amateur compare to Munich?
The Amateur is the slighter of the two, and Munich is the one to choose if you want the revenge to cost something. Both send amateurs across Europe to kill, but Spielberg makes every death hurt, while Hawes's film opens every door with a password and never lets its hero become prey. Watch The Amateur for Malek and Fishburne, Munich for the tension.
Is The Amateur based on a true story or a book?
The Amateur is adapted from Robert Littell's novel and is not based on a true story. The review does not weigh how closely it follows the book, and you need no knowledge of it to follow the film, which explains its plot plainly and often. The novel's central idea, a code-breaker who cannot fire a gun, is the best thing the film keeps.
What should I watch after The Amateur?
After The Amateur, try Munich (2005, Fi1m 80): Amateurs sent to kill across Europe, and the film makes every death cost them. Then Three Days of the Condor (1975, Fi1m 80): A CIA reader on the run, hunted by people who are actually competent; and Slow Horses (2022, Fi1m 82): Desk-bound spies pushed into the field, and much funnier about it.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Munich (2005, Fi1m 80)Amateurs sent to kill across Europe, and the film makes every death cost them.

  2. Three Days of the Condor (1975, Fi1m 80)A CIA reader on the run, hunted by people who are actually competent.

  3. Slow Horses (2022, Fi1m 82)Desk-bound spies pushed into the field, and much funnier about it.

  4. The Lives of Others (2006, Fi1m 84)A man at a listening post, and what all that watching does to him.

  5. Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy (2011, Fi1m 84)Spy offices where every corridor is a threat, and a plot that trusts you to keep up.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever