Joseph Turner (Robert Redford) reading a newspaper at a crowded lunch counter
Film review

Three Days of the Condor

1975 · Directed by Sydney Pollack · 1h 57m · MPA R

In a sentenceRobert Redford makes distrust look exhausting, even with that face

Joseph Turner (Robert Redford) works for the CIA under the code name Condor. Over the next seventy-two hours, almost everyone he trusts tries to kill him. Staying alive means deciding which contacts he can still rely on and which might lead the danger back to him. Kathy Hale (Faye Dunaway) and J. Higgins (Cliff Robertson) are among the people whose intentions he must judge. With trust itself becoming a risk, Joseph Turner has to work out how to survive without knowing who is safe to approach.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Sydney Pollack’s CIA thriller is tense, lucid and sustained by Robert Redford’s watchful intelligence. The romance is harder to believe than the conspiracy, but the pursuit gives us ample reason to stay with it.

Three Days of the Condor is an absorbing thriller with a romance it never quite makes convincing. Sydney Pollack understands the basic requirement of a conspiracy story: we need to feel uncertain without becoming indifferent to what happens next. The CIA’s business can be difficult to untangle, but the danger to Joseph Turner remains clear. The pleasure is in watching someone think his way through a threat, with no guarantee that thinking will be enough.

Robert Redford gives Joseph Turner the alertness this sort of film needs: we can see him consider a possibility before he acts on it. We were more anxious watching him work things out than during the chases, because the pauses allow us to worry that he has misunderstood the danger. His attractiveness inevitably offers some reassurance, but the performance never makes intelligence seem sufficient protection. He makes being quick-minded look like a practical means of staying alive, and the film is most involving when it lets us watch that process.

Owen Roizman’s cinematography makes the everyday surroundings worth examining, so looking for danger becomes part of watching the film. There is enough polish to remind us that this is a star vehicle, and occasionally that polish softens the unease. Stephen B. Grimes’s production design helps by keeping those surroundings ordinary, making the threat feel uncomfortably close to places where people conduct their daily business. Sydney Pollack can build suspense without having to make every setting look threatening before anyone enters it.

Don Guidice’s editing keeps the pursuit moving without making Joseph Turner’s attempts to reason his way through it feel like interruptions. The rhythm allows a chance to think, then supplies a reason to move. Dave Grusin’s music provides momentum, though the quieter stretches are more unsettling than the overt encouragement to feel suspense. Sydney Pollack also makes effective use of sounds within otherwise ordinary surroundings, encouraging us to listen for trouble as well as look for it. Across 117 minutes, the suspense rarely needs forcing.

Faye Dunaway gives Kathy Hale enough presence to resist becoming merely someone for the leading man to talk to. The romance nevertheless develops too conveniently for a film that otherwise puts such weight on suspicion. David Rayfiel and Lorenzo Semple Jr. hurry the changes of feeling, asking the attraction to do work the writing has not done. The actors have chemistry, but the suspense loses pressure while we wait for the relationship to feel earned.

G. Joubert is played with little emphasis and a composure that makes the danger harder to dismiss, providing a useful check on the glamour elsewhere. Sydney Pollack is good at making the CIA feel capable of treating a person’s survival as an administrative complication. The political explanation is less satisfying: the film supplies sufficient cause for distrust without examining it as searchingly as its serious manner sometimes promises. Within the conspiracy thriller, its particular strength is making the business of staying alive involving even when the larger picture remains cloudy. Choose it for the suspense; leave time afterwards to argue about the romance.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

70
Positive
9
Mixed
1
Negative
1
The Times
7 May 2021 · ★★★★★ · Kevin Maher
100

This peerless Sydney Pollack thriller has aged well and become positively prophetic in its depiction of US plots involving the Middle East and oil. Redford is slightly outclassed by Max von Sydow’s ruthless assassin in an unbearably tense lift sequence.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
3 April 2014 · Jesse Hassenger
85*

The critic praises the film as one of the best 1970s political thrillers, highlighting Pollack's use of unsettling sound design and everyday settings to build menace. Redford is singled out for embodying an everyman caught in paranoia and moral outrage over CIA activities.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · CPe
75*

The film is an intriguing neo-Hitchcock thriller set amid CIA power games, with an intelligent script that keeps the action moving. A certain gloss irritates, but strong scenes and the Redford/Dunaway relationship compensate.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
1 January 1975 · Roger Ebert
70*

The film is a well-made, tense thriller that feels all too believable in the post-Watergate era. It singles out the bloodless CIA types and their contingency plans for particular notice.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
10 April 2016 · Guy Lodge
70*

The reissue of Sydney Pollack’s sleek CIA conspiracy thriller holds up well forty years on and should appeal to viewers familiar with the Bourne films. Robert Redford’s star power adds gloss but the film’s shaping and pacing feel markedly modern.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 September 1975 · Vincent Canby
70*

A good-looking, entertaining suspense film that works best in its conventional pursuit and flight sequences. It creates a convincing sense of isolation around the supergovernment agencies but falls short as a serious exposé.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Three Days of the Condor worth watching?
Three Days of the Condor is worth watching for anyone who likes a conspiracy thriller built on watching a man think his way out of danger, and we scored it 80. Robert Redford's alert, wary performance and Sydney Pollack's steady handling of the pursuit carry it. The romance with Faye Dunaway develops too conveniently, and the political explanation is thinner than the film's serious manner suggests.
How long is Three Days of the Condor, and what is it rated?
Three Days of the Condor runs 1h 57m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a thriller and mystery film.
Where can I watch Three Days of the Condor in the US?
Three Days of the Condor is streaming on Pluto TV, The Roku Channel and Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $5.99. It leaves The Roku Channel on 1 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Three Days of the Condor, and is it suitable for children?
Three Days of the Condor is a UK 12, and its tension comes from suspicion and pursuit rather than from gore or sustained brutality. People are killed, and the threat to Joseph Turner is constant, but the film unsettles by making ordinary offices and streets feel unsafe rather than by showing much on screen. It is fine for teenagers; younger children would find it slow and confusing rather than frightening.
Is Three Days of the Condor based on a true story or a book?
Three Days of the Condor is based on a novel by James Grady, not on a true story. The screenplay, by David Rayfiel and Lorenzo Semple Jr., turns it into a lucid conspiracy thriller in which almost everyone Joseph Turner trusts tries to kill him over seventy-two hours. You do not need to have read the book; the film explains as much of the CIA's business as the pursuit requires and little more.
What should I watch after Three Days of the Condor?
After Three Days of the Condor, try The Lives of Others (2006, Fi1m 84): For patient suspense built from surveillance, divided loyalties and the possibility of conscience. Then Z (1969, Fi1m 84): Political murder and official obstruction, pursued with anger and a brisk sense of humour; and Decision to Leave (2022, Fi1m 82): For another uneasy entanglement of attraction and suspicion, with the romance better earned.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1976

Nominated
Best Film Editing

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Parallax View (1974) · not reviewed yetFor a colder conspiracy thriller that offers its endangered investigator even less reassurance.

  2. The Ipcress File (1965) · not reviewed yetAnother resourceful intelligence worker discovers how little protection his employer provides.

  3. The Lives of Others (2006, Fi1m 84)For patient suspense built from surveillance, divided loyalties and the possibility of conscience.

  4. Z (1969, Fi1m 84)Political murder and official obstruction, pursued with anger and a brisk sense of humour.

  5. Decision to Leave (2022, Fi1m 82)For another uneasy entanglement of attraction and suspicion, with the romance better earned.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever