Roy Dillon (John Cusack) and Myra Langtry (Annette Bening) facing each other closely
Film review

The Grifters

1990 · Directed by Stephen Frears · 1h 50m · MPA R

In a sentenceThree con artists, and the family connection is somehow the least reassuring part

Roy Dillon (John Cusack) is a con artist caught between his mother, Lilly (Anjelica Huston), and his lover, Myra Langtry (Annette Bening). Both women know the business of deceiving people, and each has a claim on Roy’s loyalty. Their relationships mix affection with the habits of people who make a living by gaining someone else’s confidence. As mother, son and lover try to work out what they can trust, their personal lives become entangled with the tricks of their trade. Stephen Frears directs this crime drama, adapted by Donald E. Westlake from Jim Thompson’s novel.

Fi1m review

Stephen Frears makes a cruel, funny crime drama out of three con artists and their competing loyalties. Anjelica Huston gives it a disturbing emotional force, though John Cusack struggles to hold his own beside her.

Stephen Frears’s The Grifters is a cruel, funny crime film with a painful family at its centre, and we recommend it with one reservation: the son is less compelling than either woman. Donald E. Westlake adapts Jim Thompson’s novel. The subject is con artists, but Frears is interested in what happens when deceit becomes their ordinary way of dealing with people. The strain comes from watching them apply the same suspicion to lovers and relatives that they bring to their work.

John Cusack plays Roy Dillon, with Anjelica Huston as his mother, Lilly, and Annette Bening as his lover, Myra Langtry. All three belong to the same crooked trade, so nobody can quite enjoy the comfort of believing themselves the cleverest person present. Westlake gives their exchanges enough bite to make the distrust funny. Frears keeps the family connection in view, which means that a suggestion of concern can trouble us as much as an obvious attempt to take advantage.

Huston is the strongest reason to stay with them. She makes Lilly’s concern for Roy feel sincere even while she is trying to control him, and we found that upsetting. The mother’s ability to read people has not taught her how to leave her son alone. Huston makes the need to survive persuasive even when the behaviour it produces is ugly. We keep watching for some small assurance that Lilly can stop treating someone she loves as another person to be managed.

Bening gives Myra an entertaining confidence, though she sometimes makes the danger too easy to spot. Cusack is less convincing when Roy needs to seem capable of holding his own with either woman. His relative softness makes sense within the family, but it also leaves passages in which we are waiting for Huston to regain our attention. Roy remains the character we understand least, despite his position between the two women.

Oliver Stapleton’s cinematography gives the film a recognisable noir finish without making the nastiness feel safely old-fashioned. Dennis Gassner’s production design supports that crime-film world, although we notice the people far more than their surroundings. That seems the right emphasis for a story whose chief danger is another person’s interest in us. The visual polish makes this company inviting enough for the distrust to take hold.

Mick Audsley’s editing keeps the three-way contest taut, giving us time to consider a possible deception without letting the suspicion become a drag. Elmer Bernstein’s music is less restrained, sometimes pressing the menace harder than these performances require. We prefer the tension when it comes from trying to judge Lilly rather than being reminded that we are watching a thriller. At 110 minutes, though, the film sustains its hold without exhausting our interest in these people.

Con-artist films can make dishonesty look like a skill we might enjoy acquiring. Frears allows that pleasure, then makes it harder to sustain when the same habits govern a mother and son. We do not need to like these people to follow them, but we do need to believe that being related still matters to them, and Huston makes us believe it. Choose it when agreeable company is not the purpose of the evening.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

77
Positive
9
Mixed
0
Negative
1
RogerEbert.com
25 January 1991 · Roger Ebert
85*

The critic praises the film's authentic film noir spirit and the powerful performances, especially Anjelica Huston's as the mother and Annette Bening's as the dangerous lover. He highlights how the story of con artists seducing one another builds to a shocking, inevitable conclusion that exposes the characters' deep-seated patterns of trust and betrayal.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
9 January 2025 · Derek Smith
85*

The review calls the film one of the queasiest, most nihilistic crime thrillers, emphasizing its palpable desperation, moral rot, and psychosexual despair among the central grifters. It notes the fatalism and soul-sucking nature of life on the grift while praising the new 4K restoration.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
5 December 1990 · Janet Maslin
85*

The critic calls the film a taut, tough and funny hard-boiled melodrama that becomes sorrowful at the end, crediting Stephen Frears with a smashing variation on classic Hollywood crime stories. She singles out the gripping dynamics among the unholy trinity of mother, son and lover as they con one another.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
80*

The film is a gripping neo-noir thriller thanks to its perfectly cast leads. Superb performances by Anjelica Huston, John Cusack and Annette Bening stand out alongside Frears' taut direction of the Jim Thompson adaptation.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
5 December 1990 · Sheila Benson
80*

The critic finds the film diamond-hard and mesmerizing in its take on Jim Thompson's novel of mother love and the rackets, praising the updated yet pure noir visuals and performances. She singles out Anjelica Huston's ferociously seductive central performance as the motor of the piece and Frears' masterful control of tension.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
13 September 2013 · Scott MacDonald
80*

The critic praises the film's craftsmanship, stylized performances by Huston, Bening, and others, and especially its bold, unapologetic handling of Oedipal themes between mother and son. The ending is singled out as a legitimate shocker that underscores the characters' ruthlessness.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Grifters worth watching?
The Grifters is worth watching for anyone who likes a cruel, funny crime drama about people who cannot stop deceiving each other, and we scored it 84. Anjelica Huston's performance as the mother is the main reason to stay, while John Cusack is the weaker of the three leads. Choose it when agreeable company is not the point of the evening.
How long is The Grifters, and what is it rated?
The Grifters runs 1h 50m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a crime and drama film.
Where can I watch The Grifters in the US?
The Grifters is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The Grifters, and is it suitable for children?
The Grifters carries a UK 15 certificate, so it is not suitable for children and is a poor choice for younger teenagers. The nastiness is mostly between people who exploit each other rather than in constant violence, though the film is unsettling in the way a mother treats her son as someone to be managed. Adults who dislike watching cruelty at close quarters may find it hard going.
Is The Grifters based on a true story or a book?
The Grifters is based on Jim Thompson's novel of the same name, adapted for the screen by Donald E. Westlake; it is not a true story. The film keeps Thompson's three con artists and their tangled loyalties, and Westlake's script gives their exchanges real bite. You do not need to have read the book to follow it.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1991

Nominated
Best Actress
Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Supporting Actress
Nominated
Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay

If you liked this, try…

  1. House of Games (1987) · not reviewed yetConfidence tricks become a dangerous education in how badly people want to believe.

  2. Night and the City (1950) · not reviewed yetA London hustler keeps talking, long after sensible people would have run.

  3. The American Friend (1977) · not reviewed yetOrdinary worries make a man dangerously useful to people who kill for money.

  4. The Last Seduction (1994, Fi1m 81)A calculating woman finds men remarkably willing to mistake appetite for affection.

  5. The Swindle (1997) · not reviewed yetA French con-artist partnership brings sharper comedy to the hazards of trusting colleagues.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever