Merry (Dominic Monaghan) and Pippin (Billy Boyd) peering over a log in the woods
Film review

The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

2001 · Directed by Peter Jackson · 2h 59m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceIan McKellen could talk us into a journey we had quite sensibly decided against

Frodo (Elijah Wood) finds himself caught in the struggle against evil in Middle-earth. A ring brings him disturbing visions, while a fellowship’s journey takes the story through kingdoms, monsters and battles. Ian McKellen plays Gandalf, Viggo Mortensen plays Aragorn, and Sean Astin plays Sam, as the hobbits become involved in events that reach far beyond themselves. Peter Jackson directs and co-writes this adaptation of J. R. R. Tolkien’s novel, alongside screenwriters Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens. The cast also includes Ian Holm as Bilbo and Sean Bean as Boromir.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Peter Jackson’s fantasy adventure is absorbing, frightening and worth the time even for those unmoved by hobbits. The battles occasionally crowd out the people, but Ian McKellen and Elijah Wood give us ample reason to care.

Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is an absorbing adventure, and we would recommend it well beyond its natural audience. Jackson expects us to accept the kingdoms, monsters and hobbits without apologising for any of them. The screenplay, written with Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens from J. R. R. Tolkien’s novel, gives the struggle against evil enough human interest to make that possible. There is time to worry about the people involved, even with another battle approaching.

Ian McKellen does much of the persuading as Gandalf, giving the solemn dialogue the ease of something thought rather than recited. His authority never seems to require an extra push from the film. Elijah Wood makes Frodo’s vulnerability a reason to watch closely, and Sean Astin gives Sam an emotional directness that this much mythology needs. Viggo Mortensen’s Aragorn and Sean Bean’s Boromir are compelling company, although the hobbits sometimes lose our attention when these larger figures take over.

The danger matters because Jackson is willing to make it unpleasant. We were frightened by the visions that accompany Frodo wearing the ring: something so small can make even looking feel unsafe. The film’s menace does not depend entirely on the arrival of another monster, and that helps it sustain our concern between the battles. Jackson also allows sadness into the adventure, so that the prospect of danger does not always feel like an invitation to enjoy ourselves.

Andrew Lesnie gives the Middle-earth landscapes a forbidding scale. It is easy to believe that a journey across them would be exhausting. Grant Major’s production design uses Gothic grandeur to make the kingdoms intimidating, with buildings that seem too imposing for anyone to feel comfortable in them. The surroundings establish a threat before the film needs to put a monster into them.

John Gilbert’s editing keeps most of the 179 minutes moving, though the repeated shift from travel to confrontation becomes noticeable. A battle can be exciting and still arrive when we would prefer another stretch with the hobbits. Jackson occasionally lets the action go on past the point where it tells us anything further about the people fighting, and the quieter characters get less room than they deserve. We missed the gentler company during some of those passages.

Howard Shore’s music helps keep the adventure from becoming a succession of contests. The score gives the grand passages a mournful undertone, which suits a film so alert to how much its characters stand to lose. At times the insistence on importance becomes heavy, particularly when the images already supply all the scale a scene needs. Yet Shore’s contribution usually makes the emotion easier to feel, and McKellen’s performance brings warmth to the solemnity.

Fantasy often asks for considerable patience while it explains who everyone is and why an object matters. Jackson makes that work easier by giving the invented world dangers we can understand without knowing its history. No prior affection for Tolkien is necessary to respond to Wood’s unease or McKellen’s reassurance. Set aside the full evening, and do not assume that a dislike of fantasy rules this one out.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

88
Positive
11
Mixed
0
Negative
0

Most critics warmly endorse Peter Jackson’s adaptation, praising its conviction, casting and ability to make Middle-earth feel like a place with its own history and rules. Praise clusters around the production design, effects and landscapes, with the battles and atmosphere of menace giving the spectacle force. Several reviews also stress the attention to character and the emotional weight of the journey, finding more than technical accomplishment in its treatment of Tolkien’s story.

Reservations centre on pacing, tone and what the adaptation loses. Variety finds the episodic structure repetitive and the length occasionally tiring, while RogerEbert.com regrets the shift from the hobbits and Tolkien’s gentleness towards action and larger characters. The Guardian is a clear dissenter, admiring the landscape but finding too little plot complication and too much humourless self-importance. The spread is therefore wider than the predominantly enthusiastic reception suggests: even the scale that many admire can become a source of fatigue.

Time Out
12 January 2026 · ★★★★★ · TCh
100

The critic finds the film creates a sophisticated universe that abides by its own mythic laws rather than condescending to audiences. The grandeur of the Gothic design and the film's menace are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2001 · Colin Kennedy
95*

The critic hails Peter Jackson’s film as the start of the greatest fantasy epic in cinema history. They single out its impeccable casting, passionate construction, emotional range, and sublime moments that transcend the genre.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
19 December 2001 · Kenneth Turan
90*

The critic hails the film as an intelligent, imaginative and passionate work that thrillingly captures the sweeping story with verve and spirit, paying close attention to character while delivering spectacle and wonder.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
5 December 2001
90*

The critic calls the film a miracle that faithfully captures the spirit of Tolkien while standing on its own as one of Hollywood's most ambitious movies. Complex and engaging characters along with state-of-the-art effects and moral significance are highlighted as strengths.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
4 December 2001 · David Hunter
90*

The critic praises Jackson's adaptation as well-made and well-cast with no reservations about the rest of the trilogy. It singles out the masterful pacing that justifies the long runtime and the top-notch production design, cinematography, effects, costumes, makeup, and score.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
19 December 2001 · ★★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
88

The critic finds the film a well-crafted modern sword-and-sorcery epic that transcends its genre but shifts focus away from the hobbits toward larger characters and action sequences, making it less true to Tolkien's gentler vision than hoped.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring worth watching?
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is worth watching, and we scored it 90, our recommendation extending well beyond people who already like fantasy. Ian McKellen and Elijah Wood give the danger a human weight, and Peter Jackson is willing to make it frightening. Set aside the full 179 minutes; the battles occasionally crowd out the hobbits, but not for long.
How long is The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, and what is it rated?
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring runs 2h 59m and is rated PG-13 by the MPA in the US. It is an adventure and fantasy film.
Where can I watch The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring in the US?
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is streaming on HBO Max, Hulu, The Roku Channel and Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $4.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring compare to The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers?
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is the more cohesive of the two, keeping its company together and its people in view for longer than The Two Towers manages. The later film is stirring but lumbers under divided storylines, redeemed largely by Andy Serkis’s Gollum. Start with the first; it earns the second.
Is The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring based on a true story or a book?
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is based on J. R. R. Tolkien’s novel, not a true story, adapted by Peter Jackson with Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens. Knowing the book is not required: Jackson gives the invented world dangers we can understand without its history. Readers will recognise the kingdoms and monsters; everyone else can simply follow Frodo.
Do you need to have seen the other Middle-earth films before The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring?
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring requires nothing seen beforehand and is a sound place to begin with the Middle-earth films. It explains who everyone is and why the ring matters as it goes, and no prior affection for Tolkien is needed to respond to Wood’s unease or McKellen’s reassurance. Newcomers can start here without worry.
What should I watch after The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring?
After The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, try Princess Mononoke (1997, Fi1m 88): An animated fantasy that takes its creatures, conflicts and human failings seriously. Then The Dark Crystal (1982, Fi1m 78): The creatures and their surroundings make another invented world feel inhabited; and A Matter of Life and Death (1946, Fi1m 92): A gentler fantasy, with human affection surviving an elaborate supernatural bureaucracy.
What order should I watch the Middle-earth films in?
Release order is the safe choice for Middle-earth, and it is the order our collection page lists them in. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is the first of the 6 Middle-earth titles on Fi1m; after it The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers. The full order.

Part of · 1 of 6

Middle-earth

6 films on Fi1m · 2001–2014 · average 74 · best The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring 90

All 6 in order

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2002

Nominated
Best Costume Design
Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Film Editing
Nominated
Best Original Song
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Production Design
Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Supporting Actor
Nominated
Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay
Won
Best Cinematography
Won
Best Makeup and Hairstyling
Won
Best Original Score
Won
Best Visual Effects

BAFTA Film Awards, 2002

Nominated
BAFTA's Children & Young People Award - Feature Film
Won
Best Film

Hugo Awards, 2002

Won
Best Dramatic Presentation

If you liked this, try…

  1. Princess Mononoke (1997, Fi1m 88)An animated fantasy that takes its creatures, conflicts and human failings seriously.

  2. The Dark Crystal (1982, Fi1m 78)The creatures and their surroundings make another invented world feel inhabited.

  3. A Matter of Life and Death (1946, Fi1m 92)A gentler fantasy, with human affection surviving an elaborate supernatural bureaucracy.

  4. The Green Knight (2021, Fi1m 78)The medieval journey becomes stranger, slower and more troubling at every stop.

  5. The Secret of Kells (2009, Fi1m 76)An Irish animated adventure whose drawings make ancient fears feel close.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever