Ben Richards (Glen Powell) standing with hands in pockets before metal stairs
Film review

The Running Man

2025 · Directed by Edgar Wright · 2h 13m · MPA R

In a sentenceColman Domingo hosts the end of the world and we would rather have watched his show

In a near-future America run by a single Network, Ben Richards (Glen Powell) is out of work and out of options, with a sick child at home and a wife, Sheila (Jayme Lawson), who wants him nowhere near the Network’s building. He goes anyway. The Running Man is the country’s most watched programme: stay alive for thirty days while a team of Hunters led by Evan McCone (Lee Pace) tracks you down, and the money is yours. Every viewer at home can phone in your whereabouts for cash. Bobby T. (Colman Domingo) hosts the show; Dan Killian (Josh Brolin) produces it. Ben signs the form, and the chase begins.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Edgar Wright’s version of Stephen King’s novel is quick, handsome and well cast, and for an hour it is a good time. Then it starts repeating itself, the satire never gets under the skin, and the ending loses its nerve.

Edgar Wright has taken Stephen King’s 1982 novel and made the version the 1987 Arnold Schwarzenegger film did not: closer to the book, poorer, angrier, with the hero’s family put back. Ben Richards (Glen Powell) cannot get work, his child is ill, and the only door still open is the Network’s, where the most watched programme in America pays a fortune to anyone who can stay alive for thirty days while being hunted. He signs the form. What follows is a fast, expensive chase film that is a pleasure for an hour and a chore by the end, and that keeps telling us what it means instead of letting us feel it.

Powell is cast against his grin, mostly to good effect. He plays Richards as a man permanently a second away from hitting someone, jaw set, eyes down, and when he does turn on the charm it reads as a tactic rather than a habit. Colman Domingo’s Bobby T., the host, is the film’s best piece of casting: he works a studio crowd like a preacher and a car salesman at once and appears to believe every word. Josh Brolin plays Dan Killian, the producer, in a low voice and a good suit and is scarier for never raising either. Lee Pace, as the lead Hunter Evan McCone, is given almost nothing to say and does a great deal of standing still.

Marcus Rowland’s production design puts this America somewhere between the decade King wrote the book in and next week: bulky television sets, cars with fins, hand-held screens that look built in a hurry and sold dear. Chung Chung-hoon shoots the poor districts in wet orange dark and the Network’s studios in a flat white glare with nowhere to hide, so the two halves of the country never share a colour. Julian Day dresses the people at home in layers and patches and the Network’s people in fabrics that shine. Steven Price’s score is thick synthesiser and drum machine, punched up with songs Wright plainly loves, and the first hour goes at the tempo of a music video.

That first hour is where our fun was. The opening escape, from a rooming house the Hunters have already surrounded, is cut by Paul Machliss so that every door and window has been shown to us before Richards needs it, and when he goes through the wrong one we knew exactly how wrong. We were having a fine time, and then a little ashamed of it, because the film keeps cutting to citizens at home phoning in his position for a bounty, and those citizens are plainly meant to be us. We noticed. We kept watching. That is the point the film wants to make, and it is the only one it makes cleanly.

The trouble is structure. Richards has to keep moving, so every twenty minutes William H. Macy’s Molie, or someone like him, hands him a new name and a new face and the film starts again in a new place with a new chase. Michael Cera’s Elton Perrakis brings the second half a jolt of nervous comedy the film could have used more of. Emilia Jones, as a member of the public called Amelia Williams who gets pulled into the chase, is given a whole change of heart in the time most films give a car crash. The screenplay, by Michael Bacall and Wright, has Killian explain what television is for at least twice, and the second time we had already got it. Then the final stretch makes a choice we will not describe, hedges it, and the hedging shows. By the two-hour mark we were checking our watches.

Shaun of the Dead (2004), Hot Fuzz (2007) and Baby Driver (2017) each had a rhythm nobody else could have cut. Here, for long stretches, there is nothing on screen that only Wright could have done, and the jokes are fewer and land softer than in anything he has made. The reviews so far are split almost exactly down the middle, and we sit in the middle too, not out of caution but because the film is half of a good one.

See it in company, with the sound up, on a night when you want to watch a man run and do not much mind why. Lower your hopes at the two-hour mark. It runs 133 minutes and carries a 15.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

56
Positive
6
Mixed
5
Negative
5

The reviews are split almost evenly, and the spread is wide. Most critics agree on two things: Edgar Wright’s chase sequences move, and Glen Powell carries them with more grit than charm. Praise clusters there, and on the decision to follow Stephen King’s novel more closely than the 1987 film, which several reviewers find restores the story’s political edge.

The reservations are just as consistent. A large number of critics say the satire on reality television is blunter than it wants to be, and the ending, whether called fudged, convoluted or confusing, is the most common complaint of all. The dissents run in both directions. The Telegraph and IndieWire find a furious, exhilarating thriller; The Times and The Independent find a dull, witless one, with The Independent arguing Powell is miscast. Between those poles sit the three-star notices, which is where the consensus settles: likeable, kinetic, and not as disturbing as it means to be.

The Telegraph
11 November 2025
85*

An exhilarating, kinetic adaptation that positions Glen Powell as a potential successor to Tom Cruise in a stylish, go-for-broke action film with strong showmanship.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
11 November 2025 · B+ · David Ehrlich
83

Wright modernizes the prescient King story into a furious action thriller about totalitarian America, with Powell channeling class-war anger in a rare Hollywood film that aims to leave audiences fired up.

Read the full review →
Empire
11 November 2025 · John Nugent
80*

The review calls it Edgar Wright's biggest and boldest film yet, a scathing satire with expansive world-building and retro-futurist style that delivers fizzy blockbuster fun. It praises Powell's grouchy, punchy lead performance while noting it is less funny than the director's earlier work.

Read the full review →
The Observer
14 November 2025 · Wendy Ide
75*

A brashly entertaining, rousing blast of propulsive popcorn entertainment in the vein of Paul Verhoeven, though not especially sharp in its insights or tidy in its plotting.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
11 November 2025 · B- · Jesse Hassenger
70

The adaptation stays closer to the book than the 1987 version but feels caught between action thrills and commentary, with mordant humor in the first hour giving way to a less clever and overstretched finish.

Read the full review →
Vulture
14 November 2025
65*

Wright’s propulsive and generally fun movie rips into reality TV but misses the mark by not focusing on the internet as the true villain, resulting in a toothless social commentary and a messy ending.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Running Man worth watching?
The Running Man is worth watching for its first hour, and we scored it 60. Edgar Wright's version of the Stephen King novel is quick, handsome and well cast, with Glen Powell as the hunted man and Colman Domingo as the host who steals the film. It then repeats itself, the satire stays shallow, and the ending loses its nerve, so it suits a night when you want a chase and do not much mind why.
How long is The Running Man, and what is it rated?
The Running Man runs 2h 13m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is an action and thriller film.
Where can I watch The Running Man in the US?
The Running Man is streaming on Paramount+, Amazon Prime Video, The Roku Channel and Apple TV in the US, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV and Amazon Prime Video from $5.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The Running Man, and is it suitable for children?
The Running Man carries a UK 15 certificate and is not for children. It is a hunt to the death played as a fast action film, with Glen Powell's Ben Richards permanently a second from hitting someone and citizens phoning in his position for cash; it is angry rather than frightening. Older teenagers should be fine, and the squeamish will find the violence brisk rather than lingering.
How does The Running Man compare to Battle Royale?
The Running Man is the faster and glossier of the two, and Battle Royale is the better film. Edgar Wright plays his televised hunt as a music-video chase with a satire that never gets under the skin, while Kinji Fukasaku takes his schoolchildren seriously and does not blink at what they do to each other. Choose Wright for company and noise, Fukasaku for something that stays with you.
Is The Running Man based on a true story or a book?
The Running Man is based on Stephen King's 1982 novel, not on a true story. Edgar Wright and Michael Bacall stay closer to the book than the 1987 Arnold Schwarzenegger film did, keeping it poorer and angrier and putting the hero's sick child and wife back into the story. You do not need to have read it; the film explains its own rules more than once.
What should I watch after The Running Man?
After The Running Man, try Battle Royale (2000, Fi1m 83): Japan sends a class of schoolchildren to kill each other and does not blink. Then RoboCop (1987, Fi1m 91): Verhoeven’s Detroit, where the adverts are the satire and the satire draws blood; and The Long Walk (2025, Fi1m 72): The other Stephen King death-game novel on screen, quieter and a good deal crueller.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Battle Royale (2000, Fi1m 83)Japan sends a class of schoolchildren to kill each other and does not blink.

  2. RoboCop (1987, Fi1m 91)Verhoeven’s Detroit, where the adverts are the satire and the satire draws blood.

  3. Series 7: The Contenders (2001) · not on Fi1m yetA reality show where contestants kill each other, made cheaply and played dead straight.

  4. Punishment Park (1971) · not reviewed yetPeter Watkins’s fake documentary about America hunting its dissidents across a desert.

  5. The Long Walk (2025, Fi1m 72)The other Stephen King death-game novel on screen, quieter and a good deal crueller.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever