A helmeted rider stands beside a motorcycle with glowing red wheels on a wet street
Film review

TRON: Ares

2025 · Directed by Joachim Rønning · 1h 59m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceThe motorbikes are red now, the score is superb, and the man on the bike has nothing to say

Ares (Jared Leto) is a program, built inside a computer and sent out of it into the world by Julian Dillinger (Evan Peters), the head of a technology company whose family name means something in this series. He arrives as a soldier and begins, slowly, to notice where he is. Eve Kim (Greta Lee) is the human he keeps running into. Gillian Anderson plays Elisabeth Dillinger, Jodie Turner-Smith plays Athena, and Jeff Bridges returns as Kevin Flynn. Joachim Rønning directs from a screenplay by Jesse Wigutow, with a score by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross. It runs 119 minutes, is a 12A, and follows Tron (1982) and Tron: Legacy (2010).

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross have written the best thing in Joachim Rønning’s third Tron film by some distance. Under it sits one good chase, a great deal of talk about what machines want, and Jared Leto not answering.

Ares (Jared Leto) is a program, made to order and sent out of the machine into the world by Julian Dillinger (Evan Peters), who owns the machine. That is the film’s one new idea, and it is a decent one: for two previous films the series asked what a person would do inside a computer, and this one asks what a computer would do out here. Joachim Rønning has hired good people to answer the question. The music is excellent, the photography is handsome, one chase is worth the ticket, and the script underneath all of it has almost nothing to say and says it several times.

Start with the music, because everyone will. Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross, with Boys Noize, have written a score of low grinding synths and drums that sound like sheet metal being beaten flat, and it does the work of about forty pages of screenplay. When a scene has no tension the bass supplies some. Jeff Cronenweth shoots the city at night in black, wet grey and red, and Darren Gilford’s design puts the series’ light trails over ordinary tarmac, so a wall of red light stands in the road where a lorry has just been.

We sat up for that first chase. A light cycle laying a solid line across a real street, with real traffic having to make sense of it, is the kind of image this series was built for and has not managed in years, and Tyler Nelson cuts it clean enough that we always knew where the bike was. Then it ends, and the film goes indoors, and we waited the better part of an hour for it to happen again. By the time it did we were bored, and then faintly cross about being bored, because every time the drums came back in we could hear what the film had been meant to be.

Leto is the other problem. Ares is supposed to be a soldier discovering that he has feelings, and Leto plays him as a man who has been told to look serene and is doing his best. He murmurs. He gazes at things. Some critics found this restful; we found nothing behind it, and a film about a machine learning to want needs an actor who can show wanting. Greta Lee, as Eve Kim, does the work of reacting, explaining and running, and she is the only person on screen who seems to be in a hurry. Peters plays Dillinger as a rich boy who has never been told no. Gillian Anderson gets two scenes of cold disappointment as Elisabeth Dillinger and plays them well. Jodie Turner-Smith’s Athena is given a weapon and a stare.

Jesse Wigutow’s screenplay, from a story by Wigutow and David DiGilio, has the idea and then explains it. Characters say what the film is about, and the ideas are the ones every film about artificial minds has had for a decade: can a made thing choose, does it deserve to. Frankenstein is invoked, more than once. There are no jokes to speak of, which in a film about a glowing man on a motorbike is a strange choice. Christine Bieselin Clark and Alix Friedberg’s suits are sleek and armoured and look as if they weigh something, which helps.

Against the series’ own standards it sits about where you would guess. Steven Lisberger, who directed Tron in 1982 and produces here, made a film that was thrilled by a toy nobody had seen before. Tron: Legacy in 2010 had Daft Punk and not much else. This one has the better score of the two and the same shortage of people. Jeff Bridges returns as Kevin Flynn, and we will not say how or for how long; the film is pleased to see him and, for a few minutes, so were we.

Most critics have landed near us, and the reviews split wide on either side, which is what happens when a film’s best and worst departments are this far apart. If you go, go to a cinema with speakers that can take it. At home the chase shrinks and the talking grows, and you will find yourself watching a fine album with a film attached. It runs 119 minutes and is a 12A, which is about right; nothing in it would frighten anyone, including its villain.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

48
Positive
5
Mixed
5
Negative
9

Most critics come away from TRON: Ares unimpressed, and the reviews lean negative. What nearly everyone agrees on is the music: the Nine Inch Nails score by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross is singled out again and again, sometimes as the only reason to stay in the seat. The visual effects and the light-cycle chases draw steady praise as well, and several reviews find it cleaner and easier to follow than Legacy.

The reservations gather around the story and the lead. Most find the AI plot recycled and the script glib, and Jared Leto’s performance is called charmless more often than not. Total Film and the Los Angeles Times both object to moving the action out of the Grid and into the real world. The spread is wide. The Telegraph, The Times and The Guardian give it the lowest marks, while HeyUGuys rates it warmly and The Hollywood Reporter alone defends Leto as subdued and affecting.

The AV Club
7 October 2025 · B- · Jesse Hassenger
70

The film is a throwback blockbuster with beautiful visual effects, cleanly shot action, and a kickass soundtrack, but it is ultimately a pretty dumb movie whose ideas feel dated and whose lead performance by Jared Leto does not work. It works as escapism thanks to its sleek, eye-filling style and early-2000s vibes.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
9 October 2025 · Alissa Wilkinson
70*

The critic finds the film more enjoyable and comprehensible than its predecessor Legacy while retaining the series' neon aesthetic and action sequences. She notes Jared Leto's lack of charisma and the movie's failure to recapture the original's low-fi charm.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
7 October 2025 · ★★★ · James Mottram
60

The critic calls it a beautifully designed but slightly hollow blockbuster that feels like stepping into the future at times. Thrilling light-cycle chases and the atmospheric Nine Inch Nails score are praised, while a seen-it-all-before AI plot and humourless script are criticised.

Read the full review →
Variety
7 October 2025 · Peter Debruge
60*

The review highlights impressive visuals and 3D effects along with intriguing AI concepts but criticizes the heavy reliance on nostalgia, callbacks to prior films, and the story feeling like an exercise in franchise extension rather than fresh ideas.

Read the full review →
Empire
8 October 2025 · John Nugent
55*

The film is a lightweight, shallow sci-fi adventure with thin characterisation and themes, relying on flashy CGI and a strong Nine Inch Nails score for its appeal. It offers fun but forgettable futuristic fluff elevated mainly by visuals and soundtrack.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
9 October 2025 · Katie Walsh
50*

The critic praises the sleek visuals, industrial soundtrack, and style but faults the overly explicit script, lack of subtlety in its AI and Frankenstein-inspired themes, and shift to less appealing real-world action sequences.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is TRON: Ares worth watching?
TRON: Ares is worth watching only for its score and one chase, and we gave it 50. Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross supply the tension the script does not, and a light cycle laying a red line across a real street is the image the series was built for. Between those moments there is a great deal of talk about what machines want, and Jared Leto not answering.
How long is TRON: Ares, and what is it rated?
TRON: Ares runs 1h 59m and is rated PG-13 by the MPA in the US. It is a science fiction and adventure film.
Where can I watch TRON: Ares in the US?
TRON: Ares is streaming on Disney+ in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is TRON: Ares, and is it suitable for children?
TRON: Ares is a 12A and nothing in it would frighten anyone, including its villain. The violence is glowing men on motorbikes and armoured suits rather than blood, and there is nothing adult beyond the certificate implies. Younger children may simply find the long indoor stretches of talk about artificial minds dull rather than upsetting.
How does TRON: Ares compare to Ghost in the Shell?
TRON: Ares and Ghost in the Shell both send a made mind into a wet neon city to ask what it is, and Oshii's film has the thought behind the question that Rønning's lacks. Ghost in the Shell is the better film by a clear margin, absorbing and melancholy, though its plotting can be needlessly opaque. Choose Ares only for the music and one chase in a cinema with speakers that can take it.
What should I watch after TRON: Ares?
After TRON: Ares, try Ghost in the Shell (1995, Fi1m 83): A made mind asking what it is, in a wet neon city, with actual thought behind it. Then Ex Machina (2014, Fi1m 82): Three people, one house, and the machine-wanting question this film only talks about.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Tron (1982) · not reviewed yetThe original, made by people delighted with a toy nobody had seen before.

  2. Ghost in the Shell (1995, Fi1m 83)A made mind asking what it is, in a wet neon city, with actual thought behind it.

  3. Ex Machina (2014, Fi1m 82)Three people, one house, and the machine-wanting question this film only talks about.

  4. Speed Racer (2008) · not reviewed yetColour, speed and a family, treated with a sincerity that shames most franchises.

  5. Upgrade (2018) · not reviewed yetA cheap, nasty, funny Australian take on a man sharing his body with software.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever