John Stewart (Aaron Pierre) and Hal Jordan (Kyle Chandler) stand before a swirling green vortex
Series review

Lanterns

2026 · Created by Damon Lindelof, Tom King, Chris Mundy · Series · MPA TV-MA

In a sentenceA small-town murder, two men who cannot stand each other, and a magic ring that keeps interrupting

Hal Jordan (Kyle Chandler), a Green Lantern of long standing, is paired with John Stewart (Aaron Pierre), who has only just been handed a ring, and sent to a small American town where a killing has drawn the attention of both the local law and something from further afield. Sheriff Kerry Kane (Kelly Macdonald) has her own way of running the case. The Macon family, Will (Garret Dillahunt), Zoe (Poorna Jagannathan) and Billy (Jason Ritter), are closer to it than they let on. Ulrich Thomsen plays Sinestro. Across eight episodes the story moves between the present investigation and John’s adolescence, with Cairo Cash Lee as the younger John. Chris Mundy, Damon Lindelof and Tom King are among the writers.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Kyle Chandler and Aaron Pierre are the best reason to watch a superhero programme in some time, and Lanterns keeps cutting away from them. A patient, well-acted crime drama with a plot that will not sit still.

Lanterns takes two Green Lanterns and puts them in a car. Hal Jordan (Kyle Chandler) has worn the ring for years and is tired of it; John Stewart (Aaron Pierre) has just been given one and is not sure he wants it. They are sent to a small town where somebody has died in a way the local sheriff cannot explain and something not from Earth may be responsible. That is the setup for eight episodes, from a writing team that includes Chris Mundy, Damon Lindelof and Tom King. It is a slow, serious police drama with a science-fiction premise, good for long stretches and, too often, in three places at once.

Chandler and Pierre are the programme. Chandler plays Hal as a man who has stopped expecting anything from the job and resents being handed a partner who still does; the weariness sits in his shoulders. Pierre gives John a stillness that is not calm, a man watching everyone around him to work out what they think he is. Their scenes together, two men in a car or across a table saying less than they mean, are the reason to stay. When a conversation is allowed to run for five minutes without a cut, it is as good as anything in the genre.

The town is well cast around them. Kelly Macdonald’s Sheriff Kane is dry, unimpressed by visitors and quietly certain she knows her own people better than any ring does. Garret Dillahunt and Poorna Jagannathan play Will and Zoe Macon, a couple the case keeps circling back to, and both can make a kitchen feel like a place where something has been agreed and never said. Ulrich Thomsen plays Sinestro, and we will say no more about him than that.

It looks the part. Gregory Middleton, Florian Hoffmeister and Armando Salas share the photography and hold to a common look: flat grey daylight, fields and car parks, nights lit by sodium and headlamps, so that the green of the ring is close to the only saturated colour on screen and looks like a fault in the picture. John Paino’s production design keeps the sheriff’s office cramped and the Macon house too clean. Stephanie Economou’s score is mostly low strings and held notes and knows when to stop. The directors, James Hawes, Geeta Patel and Stephen Williams, are of one mind about pace, which is unhurried.

The trouble is structure. The present-day case runs alongside John’s adolescence, with Cairo Cash Lee as the younger John, and there are further flashbacks around the Macons. Four editors are credited, Emily Greene, Matthew V. Colonna, Vikash Patel and Robert Abilez, and we felt the seams. Each time the investigation gets a grip, the picture cuts back to the past, and when it returns the grip has gone. The flashbacks are not bad; some are the most direct thing the show does about who gets handed power and who has to earn it. But there are too many and they arrive too regularly, like a timer going off.

In the third episode Pierre is alone with the ring, working out what it is asking of him and who decided he should have it, and it moved us more than we expected a scene about a piece of jewellery to. It is played almost in silence and Pierre does it with his hands. Then the following episode spent most of its length in the past, and we found we were waiting, and then irritated at waiting, for a programme that had just shown us it did not need to.

Damon Lindelof’s Watchmen (2019) took a comic and knew exactly what it wanted to say with it. Lanterns has the seriousness and some of the ambition, but has not decided whether it is a murder mystery with aliens in it or a story about two men and a ring with a murder for an excuse.

Worth an evening a week if you like your heroes tired and your towns grey, and if you are prepared to be patient with the cutting. Anyone hoping for spectacle should know there is little, and the show is not sorry. It carries a 15 certificate.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

73
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics agree on where Lanterns works: the mismatched partnership between Kyle Chandler and Aaron Pierre, whose prickly chemistry is praised almost universally, with the supporting ensemble close behind. The grounded, buddy-cop approach and the decision to favour human cost over spectacle are counted as strengths by the majority, and several reviews find the mystery emotionally tangible.

The reservations cluster around two things. First, debt: Variety calls the series overly derivative of Watchmen and True Detective, and Vulture finds its identity unmoored as it shifts between comic-book action and grim prestige drama. Second, structure: the flashbacks and interlocking timelines are described as disjointed more than once. The scored reviews sit in a narrow band, mostly positive with a couple mixed, but the British papers dissent sharply: the Guardian finds it dull and flat, and the Telegraph calls it a muddled mess that buries good performances under an overcomplicated plot.

The Hollywood Reporter
14 August 2026 · Daniel Fienberg
80*

The critic praises the prickly chemistry between Kyle Chandler and Aaron Pierre and the supporting ensemble, noting that the series transcends its superhero elements through engaging ideas and strong performances despite some uneven moments. The grounded, character-driven approach and buddy-cop dynamic are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
14 August 2026 · B · Dennis Perkins
77

The critic praises the earthbound drama and the simmering conflict between leads Kyle Chandler and Aaron Pierre in this somber superhero police procedural. It draws from True Detective influences but focuses heavily on human trauma and the cost of power rather than spectacle.

Read the full review →
Variety
14 August 2026 · Alison Herman
65*

The critic finds the lead performances by Kyle Chandler and Aaron Pierre compelling in their mismatched partnership and character studies, but criticizes the series for being overly derivative of other HBO shows like Watchmen and True Detective, failing to fully transcend its influences. The focus on the nature of assigned power and racial dynamics in John's story is highlighted positively.

Read the full review →
Vulture
14 August 2026 · Kathryn VanArendonk
60*

The series struggles with an unmoored identity, shifting between comic-book spectacle, grim prestige drama, and multiple interlocking storylines with frequent flashbacks. It remains engaging and not dull thanks to strong performances (especially Kyle Chandler) and occasional weird or thoughtful flourishes.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
17 August 2026

The critic finds the DC series a bust and a lot of meh despite its alien-hunting premise and buddy-cop structure across timelines. The show works hard with moments but feels dull and flat overall.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
17 August 2026

The critic calls the HBO series a muddled mess of superhero nonsense that buries strong performances beneath an overcomplicated plot and fails to deliver on its True Detective aspirations.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Lanterns worth watching?
Lanterns is worth watching for anyone who wants a slow, serious crime drama that happens to have a magic ring in it, and we scored it 68. Kyle Chandler and Aaron Pierre are the reason to stay, and the show keeps cutting away from them to flashbacks that arrive like a timer going off. Anyone hoping for spectacle should look elsewhere.
How long is Lanterns, and what is it rated?
Lanterns is rated TV-MA by the MPA in the US. It is a drama and mystery series.
Where can I watch Lanterns in the US?
Lanterns is streaming on HBO Max, Hulu, The Roku Channel and Amazon Prime Video in the US. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Lanterns, and is it suitable for children?
Lanterns carries a UK 15 certificate and a US TV-MA rating, so it is not for children. It is a patient police drama built around an unexplained killing in a small town, and the tone is grim rather than frightening; the ring is close to the only bright thing on screen. Older teenagers with the patience for it should be fine.
How does Lanterns compare to True Detective?
Lanterns borrows the shape of True Detective: two mismatched investigators, one long case, two timelines and a landscape that does not want them there. The earlier programme is the tighter of the two and knows what it is about; Lanterns has the seriousness but has not decided whether it is a murder mystery or a story about two men and a ring. Watch Lanterns if you want the same mood with aliens in it.
What should I watch after Lanterns?
After Lanterns, try True Detective (2014, Fi1m 80): Two detectives who dislike each other, one long case, and a landscape that hates them both. Then Top of the Lake (2013, Fi1m 82): A small-town investigation where the town is the suspect; Elisabeth Moss keeps her nerve.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. True Detective (2014, Fi1m 80)Two detectives who dislike each other, one long case, and a landscape that hates them both.

  2. Watchmen (2019) · not reviewed yetLindelof’s other comic adaptation, sharper about power and far surer of what it means.

  3. Top of the Lake (2013, Fi1m 82)A small-town investigation where the town is the suspect; Elisabeth Moss keeps her nerve.

  4. The Killing (2007) · not reviewed yetThe Danish original: one murder, twenty episodes, a detective in a jumper who will not let go.

  5. Twin Peaks (1990) · not reviewed yetA dead girl, a strange town, and an outsider investigator; the template everything since has borrowed.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever