Maxine (Catherine Keener) speaking with Craig (John Cusack) outside an elevator
Film review

Being John Malkovich

1999 · Directed by Spike Jonze · 1h 53m · MPA R

In a sentenceJohn Malkovich has enough trouble being John Malkovich without taking in lodgers

Craig Schwartz (John Cusack), Lotte Schwartz (Cameron Diaz) and Maxine Lund (Catherine Keener) become involved in an opportunity to experience life as John Malkovich. Malkovich plays a version of himself, an actor whose identity becomes available to other people. The possibility of being someone else draws their desires towards him, raising questions about fame, gender and what they want from their own lives. Their competing wishes make the prospect of escape more complicated than it first appears. Spike Jonze directs Charlie Kaufman’s fantasy comedy.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Spike Jonze and Charlie Kaufman’s excellent fantasy comedy makes borrowing an actor’s identity funny, troubling and surprisingly sad. The plotting can get busy, but John Malkovich and Catherine Keener keep the people interesting.

Being John Malkovich is a fine comedy about wanting to get away from yourself and failing to consider what that might cost somebody else. Spike Jonze directs Charlie Kaufman’s screenplay with enough composure to make borrowing an actor’s identity seem almost practical. We recommend it, although its ingenious plotting sometimes hurries past the characters’ feelings. The people here want relief from themselves, admiration and someone else’s affection.

Comedy built around one peculiar idea can wear thin quickly, so it matters that Kaufman is interested in more than surprise. Celebrity is part of the attraction, but questions of gender and desire make the wish to become someone else harder to dismiss as vanity. Jonze handles this without suddenly declaring that the serious part has begun. The same selfish behaviour that gets the laughs also makes it difficult for these people to find affection.

Cusack gives Craig Schwartz the aggrieved seriousness of a man who thinks wanting something badly makes him entitled to it. Diaz’s Lotte Schwartz feels less certain of who she wants to be, and her vulnerability stops the fantasy becoming entirely smug. Keener’s Maxine Lund hardly needs to announce her contempt; she makes other people’s neediness do the work for her. There is pleasure in watching such incompatible temperaments pursue satisfaction, although being stuck with them is sometimes wearing.

Malkovich is the crucial piece of casting, and not simply because his name is in the title. He is funny because he takes the interference seriously and allows the indignity to show. We laughed at his humiliation, then felt rather ashamed: other people are treating a living man as a solution to their own disappointments. He gives this version of himself enough dignity for us to understand why the arrangement might not be much fun for him.

Lance Acord’s cinematography keeps our attention on the faces, where irritation and longing make the odd premise credible. K.K. Barrett’s production design makes the absurdity feel drably plausible, giving the actors somewhere convincing to behave badly. Eric Zumbrunnen’s editing makes selfish decisions feel alarmingly quick and easy, though the accumulation of complications becomes tiring. Carter Burwell’s music allows some sadness without asking us to pardon anyone. That restraint helps when the screenplay is already giving us so much to think about.

The cost is a certain impatience with anyone who needs time to feel. Kaufman can be so busy finding another use for the premise that an emotional consequence seems to have been registered and hurried past. Diaz gives Lotte enough vulnerability for us to want more attention paid to her, especially when the film is sorting out its cleverer complications. Keener is wonderfully exact, but Maxine’s disdain can become predictable once we know how little respect she has to spare.

Allow its 113 minutes your full attention, and avoid having the later complications explained beforehand. There is enough pleasure in discovering how far Jonze and Kaufman will take the idea to make advance preparation a waste. Choose it when a comedy need not provide anyone you would willingly invite round.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

86
Positive
16
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are unanimous in favour. Nearly every critic reaches for the word original, and most credit Charlie Kaufman’s script first, for holding to its own logic while the premise gets stranger, and Spike Jonze’s direction second, for playing the absurdity straight. The performances draw the next cluster of praise: Malkovich sending himself up, and Catherine Keener and Cameron Diaz cast against expectation. Several later reviews find the film’s ideas about celebrity and identity have grown more pointed with time.

The spread is narrow. Where reservations appear they concern stamina rather than conception. The Independent finds the first three-quarters of an hour hilarious and fears the film runs out of steam after that, and Time Out thinks it loses its way once the sexual rivalries take over. Slant Magazine, rating it similarly, locates the only honest relationship in the film between Lotte and a chimpanzee. Nobody disputes the premise; the argument is about whether the film sustains it.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Alan Jones
100

The review describes the film as a crazy, surreal comedy that dazzles with its daring originality as a metaphysical fantasy while pondering identity and gender. It singles out the subversive, Kafkaesque mind trip and the classic sequence inside Malkovich's head as highlights.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
16 May 2012 · A · Scott Tobias
95

The critic praises the film as one of the most original American comedies of its time whose themes of identity and desire have only grown more resonant. It singles out Charlie Kaufman's script for its emotional complexity, framing the surreal story as ultimately a passionate love story.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2013 · Caroline Westbrook
90*

The critic calls the film dazzlingly original and one of the most startling pictures in a long time, managing to be hysterically funny and achingly poignant. Jonze and Kaufman's script and the performances, especially Malkovich sending himself up, are singled out as outstanding.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· Chris Chang
90*

The film is celebrated as a paradoxically cerebral yet ridiculous debut that brilliantly extends the director's offbeat, visually illogical commercial idiom to feature length. It singles out the inspired casting of Malkovich as elevating the actor to an axiom while probing displaced desire, celebrity, and identity through surreal persona transfer.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
29 October 1999 · Kenneth Turan
90*

The critic calls the film a clever and outrageous piece of whimsical fantasy that is unique and unpredictable, praising its surreal premise, playful dialogue, and the way Jonze and Kaufman treat the bizarre scenario as normal while slyly raising philosophical questions about identity.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Jonathan Romney
90*

The critic calls the film an incredibly rich and entertaining metaphysical comedy that transcends its premise through its inquiry into personality, fame, and desire. They single out the subversive use of Malkovich's image and the strong, unexpected performances, especially from Catherine Keener.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Being John Malkovich worth watching?
Being John Malkovich is worth watching for anyone who likes a comedy built on one strange idea and followed through with composure, and we scored it 89. Spike Jonze and Charlie Kaufman make borrowing an actor's identity funny, troubling and rather sad. The plotting can get busy and nobody here is likeable, but that is much of the point.
How long is Being John Malkovich, and what is it rated?
Being John Malkovich runs 1h 53m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a comedy and drama film.
Where can I watch Being John Malkovich in the US?
Being John Malkovich is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Being John Malkovich, and is it suitable for children?
Being John Malkovich is a UK 15, and it earns that certificate through adult themes rather than violence or fear. The comedy turns on desire, gender and people treating a living man as a solution to their own disappointments, so it is not for children. Teenagers old enough for the certificate should find little to frighten them and a good deal to think about.
How does Being John Malkovich compare to The Double Life of Véronique?
Being John Malkovich and The Double Life of Véronique are both unsettled films about identity, but Kieślowski's is the more tender and Jonze's the more deliberately cruel. Kaufman's comedy finds its laughs in selfishness and hurries past some of the feelings it stirs; Kieślowski's drama moves quietly and asks us to care. Choose Jonze for wit, Kieślowski for warmth.
What should I watch after Being John Malkovich?
After Being John Malkovich, try Seconds (1966, Fi1m 84): Another chance to become somebody else, treated with considerably more dread. Then The Exterminating Angel (1962, Fi1m 87): A social gathering turns absurd, with manners proving no defence against panic; and The Double Life of Véronique (1991, Fi1m 86): Another unsettled account of identity, with more tenderness and less deliberate cruelty.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2000

Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Supporting Actress
Nominated
Best Writing, Original Screenplay

Grand prix du Festival de Deauville, 1999

Won
Grand prix du Festival de Deauville

If you liked this, try…

  1. Seconds (1966, Fi1m 84)Another chance to become somebody else, treated with considerably more dread.

  2. The Exterminating Angel (1962, Fi1m 87)A social gathering turns absurd, with manners proving no defence against panic.

  3. The Double Life of Véronique (1991, Fi1m 86)Another unsettled account of identity, with more tenderness and less deliberate cruelty.

  4. After Life (1998, Fi1m 85)A bureaucratic fantasy about what remains of us, handled with unusual tenderness.

  5. Adaptation. (2002, Fi1m 83)Jonze and Kaufman turn another impossible premise into painfully recognisable creative anxiety.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever