Paul Matthews (Nicolas Cage) standing outdoors with arrows stuck in his back
Film review

Dream Scenario

2023 · Directed by Kristoffer Borgli · 1h 42m · MPA R

In a sentenceNicolas Cage becomes the most famous man alive by standing in a field with his hands in his pockets

Paul Matthews (Nicolas Cage) teaches biology at a small university, wears a parka indoors and has spent years not writing his book about the intelligence of ants. He is married to Janet (Julianne Nicholson) and has two daughters, Sophie (Lily Bird) and Hannah (Jessica Clement). One morning Sophie mentions that he was in her dream, standing by and doing nothing while things fell from the sky. Then a stranger says the same. Within weeks, thousands of people are dreaming of Paul, always as a bystander with his hands in his pockets. A marketing firm run by Trent (Michael Cera) sees an opportunity. Paul sees a chance to get his book published at last. Kristoffer Borgli writes, directs and edits.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Kristoffer Borgli hands Nicolas Cage a receding hairline, a parka and the whole world’s dreams, and for an hour the result is a small, sharp, funny film about wanting to be noticed. Then it starts explaining itself, and gets smaller.

Paul Matthews is the kind of man people forget while he is still talking to them. He teaches biology at a small university, he has been meaning to write a book about ants for years, and he keeps a private tally of colleagues who have done better. Then he starts turning up in other people’s dreams, doing nothing at all, and Kristoffer Borgli’s comedy is about what a man like that does with the attention. For its first hour it is sharp, sad and properly funny. For its last half hour it is a lecture, and that is a smaller thing to be.

Nicolas Cage plays him with no vanity and almost no volume. The hairline has been pushed back, Kaysie Bergens puts him in a parka he never seems to take off and glasses he is forever adjusting, and the voice is a pinched, reasonable murmur that turns aggrieved the moment anyone disagrees with him. It is a performance built out of small things: a laugh a beat too late, a hand raised to make a point nobody is waiting for. Cage has spent thirty years being the loudest thing in the frame. Here the joke is that he is the dullest, and he plays it dead straight.

The dreams are the film’s best idea, and the way they are shot is the second best. Benjamin Loeb lights them exactly as he lights the waking scenes: flat, a little drab, the colours of a university corridor in February. Borgli, editing his own picture, cuts straight from a kitchen to a burning field without so much as a fade, so that for a second you are not sure which one you are in, which is how dreams actually work. In each of them Paul stands to one side, hands in his pockets, watching, and we laughed harder each time. A collapsing house, a man on fire, an alligator, and there is Paul, looking mildly interested. Owen Pallett’s score stays low and stringy under all of it, and Zosia Mackenzie’s sets are so ordinary that a lecture hall and a nightmare look like the same place.

Julianne Nicholson does more with less than anyone else in it. Janet is the one person who knew Paul before the world did, and Nicholson lets you watch her decide, scene by scene, how much of this she is prepared to put up with. Michael Cera and Kate Berlant run the agency that wants to sell Paul’s face, and their pitch meeting, in which Cera explains with complete seriousness what a soft drink could do inside a dream, is the best stretch of dialogue in the film. Tim Meadows, as Brett, has the tired face of a man who has sat through a great many complaints.

The trouble begins when the dreams stop being harmless. We will not say how, but the trailer has. For a few scenes Borgli lands the turn. Then the film starts arguing. Paul, who has been a small and rather unpleasant man for an hour, is asked to stand in for something much larger than himself. He is not big enough for the job, the script seems to know it, and it goes on anyway. We stopped laughing and started checking how much was left. A late detour into a piece of technology, with a Noah Centineo cameo attached, belongs to a different and broader satire.

Borgli’s previous film, Sick of Myself, was about a woman who made herself ill to be looked at, and it kept its nerve to the last frame. This one has the better premise and the bigger star, and it flinches. Critics have reached for Charlie Kaufman, and the comparison holds for the first hour; Cage’s own Adaptation is the obvious cousin. Kaufman would not have let the film explain what it thinks about the internet.

At 102 minutes it does not overstay, and the last scene, which we will not describe, is quieter and kinder than we expected. Watch it for Cage standing quite still while the world burns behind him. It is a joke that does not wear out, and the film knows it.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

76
Positive
19
Mixed
4
Negative
0

Critics agree almost unanimously on one thing: Nicolas Cage. Nearly every review, from the festival raves to the cooler notices, singles out his restrained, vanity-free turn as the drab professor who starts appearing in strangers’ dreams, and several call it among the best work of his career. The premise draws warm words too, with the dream sequences praised for folding horror into comedy without any soft-focus reverie.

The reservations cluster in the second half. A sizeable minority find that once the dreams turn nightmarish the film narrows into a satire of cancel culture they consider shallow or scattershot, and the ending is a common complaint. The Evening Standard goes furthest, judging that the satire runs out of ideas after a lively first hour, and the Los Angeles Times and Vulture make similar points about a bland or narrow-minded turn. The spread is fairly narrow, with no outright negative reviews, and the dissenters admire the same performance everyone else does.

IndieWire
9 September 2023 · A- · David Ehrlich
90

The critic calls it Borgli's funniest and most complete film yet, a hilariously surreal comedy about internet fame with a committed Cage performance. The high-concept premise and surreal comedy are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
12 September 2023 · ★★★½/4
88

The critic praises the absurdist setup allowing Cage to flex his acting muscles in hilarious directions and the emotional core he provides. The meta satire on meme status, cancel culture, and fame is engaging though unfocused at times.

Read the full review →
Variety
10 September 2023 · Critics Pick · Peter Debruge
85*

The critic hails it as ranking among Cage's best in a career of over 100 credits, with the actor making the most of a memorable role in this brilliant look at viral celebrity. Borgli approaches the surrealist premise in a singular mix of comedic and sinister tones.

Read the full review →
Empire
7 November 2023 · John Nugent
80*

The review calls the film an enjoyably absurd comedy with Nicolas Cage brilliantly playing a mediocre man thrust into fame via collective dreams. It praises the surreal dream sequences, satirical targets, and Cage's peak performance in a psycho-comic-drama that turns existential.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
8 November 2023 · 3/4/3 · Mark Asch
80

The review calls it a bitterly funny, Kaufman-esque satire of meme culture and the desire for recognition, praising its sharp take on branding and public projection. It notes the film is easy to enjoy but harder to remember long-term.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
13 November 2023
80*

The critic praises the film as one of Cage's most fulfilling ventures, allowing him to trade richly in the unforeseen as a lecturer who appears in strangers' dreams. It is welcomed for its matter-of-fact approach to switching between reality and reverie without dreamy visuals.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Dream Scenario worth watching?
Dream Scenario is worth watching for its first hour, which is a sharp, sad and properly funny comedy about wanting to be noticed, and we scored it 70. Nicolas Cage, playing dull and dead straight, is the reason to see it. The last half hour turns into a lecture about the internet, and the film gets smaller for it.
How long is Dream Scenario, and what is it rated?
Dream Scenario runs 1h 42m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a comedy and fantasy film.
Where can I watch Dream Scenario in the US?
Dream Scenario is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $4.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Dream Scenario, and is it suitable for children?
Dream Scenario carries a UK 15 certificate and is not for children. The dreams are its main source of unease: a collapsing house, a man on fire, an alligator, all watched calmly by Cage with his hands in his pockets, and they stop being harmless partway through. Teenagers used to dark comedy should be fine; the squeamish will find it more sad than frightening.
How does Dream Scenario compare to Upstairs, Downstairs?
Dream Scenario and Upstairs, Downstairs are different kinds of thing altogether: one a modern comic fantasy about a nobody who turns up in strangers' dreams, the other a household drama about servants and the class tensions that keep it from getting too comfortable. The Cage film is the funnier and the one that loses its nerve. The older title is stiffer in its staging but steadier from start to finish.
What should I watch after Dream Scenario?
After Dream Scenario, try Being John Malkovich (1999, Fi1m 83): The other film about a nobody who gets inside strangers’ heads, and it stays funnier. Then The King of Comedy (1982, Fi1m 88): De Niro wants fame with the same pinched need, and Scorsese lets it curdle; and Toni Erdmann (2016, Fi1m 86): A German father embarrasses his daughter for nearly three hours and we would watch three more.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Being John Malkovich (1999, Fi1m 83)The other film about a nobody who gets inside strangers’ heads, and it stays funnier.

  2. Sick of Myself (2022) · not reviewed yetBorgli’s previous film, about a woman who poisons herself to be noticed; it does not flinch.

  3. The King of Comedy (1982, Fi1m 88)De Niro wants fame with the same pinched need, and Scorsese lets it curdle.

  4. Toni Erdmann (2016, Fi1m 86)A German father embarrasses his daughter for nearly three hours and we would watch three more.

  5. Pig (2021, Fi1m 82)Cage quiet again, as a truffle hunter in Portland; proof the stillness is a choice.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever