James Whale (Ian McKellen) holding a gas mask to his face indoors
Film review

Gods and Monsters

1998 · Directed by Bill Condon · 1h 45m · MPA R

In a sentenceIan McKellen makes a chat with the gardener worth clearing the diary for

James Whale (Ian McKellen), a gay film director in later life, forms an unlikely friendship with young gardener Clayton Boone (Brendan Fraser). Their conversations bring men of different ages and backgrounds together, while Whale’s memories return him to his earlier life. Flashbacks place the growing friendship alongside the director’s past, including the losses that remain with him. Bill Condon writes and directs this fictionalised portrait of Whale, adapted from a novel by Christopher Bram. Set against Hollywood and the echoes of Whale’s horror films, it follows the two men’s developing acquaintance and the memories that Whale brings to it.

Fi1m review

Bill Condon’s drama about James Whale is warm, moving and worth watching for Ian McKellen and Brendan Fraser. The script explains too much, but the two actors give the friendship a tenderness that makes the clumsiness forgivable.

Bill Condon’s Gods and Monsters is a moving drama about an unlikely friendship, with a lead performance more searching than the screenplay around it. Ian McKellen plays James Whale, a gay film director whose later life supplies the basis for this fictionalised account. Brendan Fraser is Clayton Boone, the young gardener who becomes his companion. Condon, adapting Christopher Bram’s novel, is interested in what happens when someone accustomed to commanding attention has to ask for it.

McKellen gives Whale the practised ease of a man who knows how to make company enjoyable, and enough unease to suggest the effort involved. His wit is pleasurable, but it does not make him invulnerable. We were moved by the loneliness in his scenes with Fraser, because McKellen makes the wish to be liked so difficult for Whale to disguise. The performance allows for vanity and calculation without treating either as grounds for withholding sympathy.

Fraser deserves a share of the credit for that. Boone could have been reduced to the convenient younger man who lets an older character explain his life, particularly in a script this fond of recollection. Fraser gives him sufficient weight that the encounters feel like a relationship between two people, even when Condon is arranging another opportunity for Whale to look back. We believe Boone has a life beyond these conversations, which makes his participation in them matter.

Stephen M. Katz’s photography gives the California setting an openness that suits the film’s warmth. The angular echoes of Whale’s horror films are less reassuring, and Richard Sherman’s production design helps make Hollywood’s comforts look like poor consolation for Whale’s losses. These are useful choices for a drama in which memory keeps intruding on present company. Condon occasionally presses the resemblance too hard, but the images do much of the work before the dialogue begins explaining it.

Virginia Katz’s editing is clear through the shifts into Whale’s past, so we are seldom busy working out where we are when we should be attending to him. The recollections deepen our sense of what Whale brings to the friendship without making the present-day scenes feel like interruptions. Carter Burwell’s music contributes to the tenderness without requiring the actors to compete with it. The film works best when Condon allows their performances to determine how much a moment should mean.

The writing is less discreet. Condon sometimes explains a feeling that McKellen has already made clear, and the dialogue can sound as though it is checking that we have understood the connection between an artist and his creatures. The echoes of Frankenstein are easy enough to grasp without this assistance. That fondness for explanation limits the film’s complexity, though it never becomes severe enough to turn Whale into a case study or Boone into someone who merely asks questions for our benefit.

As a drama about old Hollywood, it is refreshingly willing to spend time on companionship rather than insist that fame itself is fascinating. There is hurt here, and humour, without much appetite for punishing Whale for either his vanity or his desires. We would not turn to it for a full account of his career; Condon has chosen a smaller subject and mostly judged its scale well. Watch it for McKellen, but leave enough attention for Fraser.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

76
Positive
10
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are uniformly positive, and nearly all of them come back to Ian McKellen. His James Whale is the reason most critics give for seeing the film, with several calling it the performance that carries everything around it. Brendan Fraser’s gardener draws warmer notice than expected, and Bill Condon’s use of flashbacks to Whale’s past, along with his variations on the Frankenstein films, is credited with giving the character study its shape.

The spread is narrow; the disagreement is over how much the film beyond McKellen amounts to. The Los Angeles Times finds the rest does not match his subtlety, Variety doubts the historical fiction in the final stretch, and The Guardian notes some clumsy exposition while placing it below Sunset Boulevard. Roger Ebert calls it good-hearted rather than deep. The warmest notices, from The New Yorker and The New York Times, treat it as a resonant portrait of gay Hollywood in Whale’s era.

The New Yorker
2 November 1998 · Anthony Lane
90*

The film is an engrossing look at the final days of James Whale, draped in the angular landscape of his own horror films. It offers a witty portrait of Hollywood where monsters and gods become indistinguishable after a few Martinis.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
4 November 1998 · Janet Maslin
90*

Ian McKellen delivers a richly memorable performance as the urbane gay director James Whale in this touching character study. The film creates a deeply resonant portrait of Whale and the gay Hollywood of his era through well-chosen glimpses of the past.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
80*

The critic praises the film as a meticulous adaptation rooted in the final days of James Whale, highlighting Ian McKellen's Oscar-worthy performance as the director and Brendan Fraser's surprising depth in the supporting role. It singles out the perfectly played central relationship and the emotional, fantasy-tinged finale for particular acclaim.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 March 2002 · Keith Phipps
80*

Ian McKellen dominates as James Whale in this adaptation of the novel about the director's final days. The film benefits from Brendan Fraser's performance and Bill Condon's integration of themes via flashbacks to Whale's past.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
26 March 1999 · Jonathan Romney
75*

The critic views the film as a wry, disillusioned portrait of old Hollywood's grandeur and misery, comparable to Sunset Boulevard but not quite its equal. He singles out the performances, particularly Ian McKellen's, and the evocative visuals for praise, while noting some expository clumsiness in the script.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
4 November 1998 · Kenneth Turan
70*

Ian McKellen gives an astonishing performance as James Whale that reaches a new plateau, even if the rest of the film does not match its subtlety. The film mixes humor and pathos with flashbacks but is elevated primarily by its lead actor.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Gods and Monsters worth watching?
Gods and Monsters is worth watching for Ian McKellen and Brendan Fraser, and we scored it 82. Bill Condon's drama about the director James Whale and his gardener is warm and moving, though the script keeps explaining feelings the actors have already made plain. Suits anyone who prefers companionship to spectacle in a film about old Hollywood.
How long is Gods and Monsters, and what is it rated?
Gods and Monsters runs 1h 45m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a drama film.
Where can I watch Gods and Monsters in the US?
Gods and Monsters is streaming on Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from $2.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Gods and Monsters, and is it suitable for children?
Gods and Monsters is a talky adult drama, not a violent or frightening one, though it carries an R rating in the United States and has no UK certificate on record. Its subject is a gay director in later life, his losses and his desire for company, so it is for adults and older teenagers rather than children. There are echoes of Whale's horror films, but nothing scary.
How does Gods and Monsters compare to The Dresser?
Gods and Monsters and The Dresser both put a difficult older performer beside a younger man he comes to depend on, and both live or die by their two leads. Peter Yates films the stage play plainly and leaves everything to Albert Finney and Tom Courtenay; Bill Condon gives Ian McKellen and Brendan Fraser more sunlight and more explanation than they need. We find The Dresser the sparer and slightly stronger piece, Gods and Monsters the gentler one.
Is Gods and Monsters based on a true story or a book?
Gods and Monsters is adapted from Christopher Bram's novel and is a fictionalised portrait of James Whale, the real director of Frankenstein, rather than a factual biography. Bill Condon invents the friendship with a gardener to look at Whale's loneliness and his past, and does not attempt a full account of his career. You need know nothing about Whale or the book to follow it.
What should I watch after Gods and Monsters?
After Gods and Monsters, try The Dresser (1983, Fi1m 80): Another difficult older performer finds that depending on someone makes companionship awkward. Then The Spirit of the Beehive (1973, Fi1m 87): Another patient drama that finds private fears reflected in an old horror film; and A Single Man (2009, Fi1m 72): Private grief and carefully managed appearances, with feeling beneath the immaculate clothes.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1999

Nominated
Best Actor
Nominated
Best Supporting Actress
Won
Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Dresser (1983, Fi1m 80)Another difficult older performer finds that depending on someone makes companionship awkward.

  2. Death in Venice (1971) · not reviewed yetFor desire, ageing and a lead performance that makes solitude uncomfortable.

  3. The Spirit of the Beehive (1973, Fi1m 87)Another patient drama that finds private fears reflected in an old horror film.

  4. A Single Man (2009, Fi1m 72)Private grief and carefully managed appearances, with feeling beneath the immaculate clothes.

  5. Lucky (2017, Fi1m 76)An older man’s daily routines become quietly moving without demanding our pity.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever