Randy Monaghan (Ann Sheridan) with Parris Mitchell (Robert Cummings) and Drake McHugh (Ronald Reagan)
Film review

Kings Row

1942 · Directed by Sam Wood · 2h 07m · MPA NR

In a sentenceThe town where you should on no account visit either doctor

Kings Row, a small American town, 1890. Parris Mitchell (Robert Cummings) is an orphan raised in the big house on the hill by his grandmother, Madame von Eln (Maria Ouspenskaya), and he wants to be a doctor. His best friend is Drake McHugh (Ronald Reagan), rich, idle and waiting to come into his money. His first love is Cassandra Tower (Betty Field), whose father, Dr Alexander Tower (Claude Rains), has taken her out of school and keeps her at home behind drawn curtains; Parris begins studying medicine in that house. Across town, Dr Henry Gordon (Charles Coburn) and his wife Harriet (Judith Anderson) forbid their daughter Louise (Nancy Coleman) from seeing Drake. Across the railway tracks, Randy Monaghan (Ann Sheridan) lives with her father, Pa Monaghan (Ernest Cossart). Parris is preparing to leave for Vienna.

Fi1m review

Sam Wood’s film of Henry Bellamann’s scandalous novel is small-town melodrama done with real skill: handsomely built, superbly scored and acted with conviction by nearly everyone. The censored script leaves gaps where the horrors should be, and Robert Cummings is too mild for the centre.

Kings Row is a small American town in 1890, and the film that takes its name is about what goes on behind its front doors. Henry Bellamann’s novel, published in 1940, told the town’s secrets bluntly. Casey Robinson’s screenplay has to tell them with the Production Code office reading over his shoulder, so the worst things happen off screen and a great deal of Erich Wolfgang Korngold’s orchestra happens on it. What survives is a handsome, long, absorbing melodrama. We enjoyed most of its 127 minutes, and we can see exactly where the knife went in.

The best of it is in the Tower house. Claude Rains plays Dr Alexander Tower as a man who has decided to sit very still for the rest of his life: he reads, he speaks quietly, he pours a drink, and the parlour gets colder. Betty Field plays his daughter Cassandra with a bright, quick nervousness that never settles, as if she has been told to be charming and cannot remember why. Their scenes together unsettled us more than anything the film shows outright. Robinson is not allowed to say what is wrong in that house, and Rains and Field make us feel it anyway. The censor cut the words; the actors kept the meaning.

Across town is the other doctor, and he is no safer. Charles Coburn’s Henry Gordon is all genial bulk on the porch, and Judith Anderson’s Harriet runs the household, and her daughter Louise (Nancy Coleman), with a stare and a closed door. Anderson has few lines and is the most frightening person in the film. Nancy Coleman gets the hardest job, a girl coming apart in a house that will not admit anything is wrong, and she does it without the film giving her much room.

Ronald Reagan is better here than anywhere else we have seen him. Drake McHugh is a rich boy with a buggy and no plans, and Reagan plays him with an easy grin and a slouch that says he has never once been refused anything. Ann Sheridan, top billed, arrives late as Randy Monaghan, the girl from the wrong side of the tracks, and the film relaxes the moment she walks in; she is warm and plain-spoken and she and Reagan are good together. The second half sends Drake somewhere we will not describe. It gives Reagan one line, spoken from a bed, that most readers will already know, and he earns it. We did not expect to be moved by it and we were.

William Cameron Menzies lays the town out so that we always know where we are: the von Eln house and orchard on the hill, the Gordons’ porch, the Tower place behind its fence, the tracks and the Monaghan house on the other side of them. James Wong Howe shoots the lawns in hard sunlight and the interiors in deep focus, with a lamp or a banister crowding the front of the frame, so the rooms feel smaller than the houses. Orry-Kelly puts Sheridan in cotton and Anderson in black and lets us draw our own conclusions. Korngold’s main theme, brass over surging strings, is one of the great Hollywood tunes, and anyone who knows the Star Wars fanfare will hear where it came from. There is a lot of it. Whole conversations are carried on above the orchestra, and the film would be sharper with about a third of the music removed.

The trouble is at the centre. Robert Cummings plays Parris at eighteen and at thirty, in Kings Row and in Vienna, with the same pleasant, slightly anxious face. The film asks him to carry its ideas about medicine and cruelty and he carries them like a parcel. Ralph Dawson has to cover some fifteen years, and the boyhood section moves briskly, but the stretch with Parris abroad is a film waiting for letters to arrive. Kaaren Verne’s Elise Sandor turns up late as his reward, and Harry Davenport’s Colonel Skeffington and Maria Ouspenskaya’s Madame von Eln are there to explain wills and property whenever the plot needs it.

The reviews have disagreed since the week it opened. One 1942 critic found it turgid; we did not. It is long, and it is soft where the book was hard, but it is not dull, and everything from Peyton Place onwards owes it a debt. See it for Rains, Field and Anderson, and for Reagan’s one great scene. If you ever find yourself in Kings Row, stay in good health.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

64
Positive
4
Mixed
0
Negative
1
Time Out
10 September 2012 · PK
80*

The critic calls it one of the great melodramas and a compelling, perverse portrait of small-town America. They single out the memorable performances, especially Ronald Reagan's as the legless character wondering 'Where's the rest of me?'

Read the full review →
Empire
13 April 2006 · David Parkinson
70*

The review highlights a fascinating contrast in performances from Hitchcock alumni, particularly praising Judith Anderson's imperious and menacing turn. It notes the film now seems tame and occasionally risible but was a hot property in 1942 as a prototype soap opera.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
31 January 1942 · Russell Maloney
70*

The film is a crisp, competent and confident job that gives a rare glow and stands out as plainly too good for typical year-end lists; it is a good movie produced by Warner Brothers.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1941
70*

The novel becomes an impressive and occasionally inspiring though overlong picture under Sam Wood's eloquent direction; it is an atmospheric story that is steadily engrossing and plausible.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
3 February 1942 · Bosley Crowther
30*

The film is a bulky, turgid and disappointing adaptation of the novel, lacking coherence, unity and conviction in its performances and direction.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Kings Row worth watching?
Kings Row is worth watching for anyone who likes long, handsomely made small-town melodrama, and we scored it 70. Claude Rains, Betty Field and Judith Anderson make the two doctors' houses quietly frightening, and Ronald Reagan gets one scene he earns. Robert Cummings is too mild at the centre, and the censored script leaves gaps where the horrors should be.
How long is Kings Row, and what is it rated?
Kings Row runs 2h 07m and is rated NR by the MPA in the US. It is a romance and drama film.
Where can I watch Kings Row in the US?
Kings Row is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Kings Row compare to The Magnificent Ambersons?
Kings Row and The Magnificent Ambersons are both about American towns at the turn of the century, and the Welles film is the finer of the two by some distance, even in its cut-down form. Kings Row is the more conventional melodrama, softer where its source was hard, but it is absorbing and well acted. Watch Ambersons for the sharper eye; Kings Row for Rains, Field and Anderson.
Is Kings Row based on a true story or a book?
Kings Row is based on Henry Bellamann's novel, published in 1940, not on a true story. The book told the town's secrets bluntly; Casey Robinson's screenplay had to satisfy the Production Code office, so the worst things happen off screen and are only implied. Knowing the novel is not required, but it explains why the film sometimes feels as if something has been cut.
What should I watch after Kings Row?
After Kings Row, try Written on the Wind (1956, Fi1m 83): Sirk takes the same family rot and paints it in Technicolor. Then The Magnificent Ambersons (1942, Fi1m 89): Another American town at the turn of the century, watched by a sharper eye; and Peyton Place (1957, Fi1m 64): The direct descendant: pretty streets, locked doors, secrets the neighbours already know.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1943

Nominated
Best Cinematography, Black-and-White
Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Picture

If you liked this, try…

  1. Written on the Wind (1956, Fi1m 83)Sirk takes the same family rot and paints it in Technicolor.

  2. The Magnificent Ambersons (1942, Fi1m 89)Another American town at the turn of the century, watched by a sharper eye.

  3. Peyton Place (1957, Fi1m 64)The direct descendant: pretty streets, locked doors, secrets the neighbours already know.

  4. Blue Velvet (1986, Fi1m 88)Lynch’s picket-fence town, with everything Kings Row could not show.

  5. Fanny and Alexander (1982, Fi1m 92)Bergman’s childhood, big houses and one household ruled by a frightening man.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever