Spider-Man (Tom Holland) shaking hands with Mysterio (Jake Gyllenhaal) in a dim room
Film review

Spider-Man: Far From Home

2019 · Directed by Jon Watts · 2h 09m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceTeenagers try to hold hands in Prague while a large angry weather system keeps interrupting

Eight months after the events of Avengers: Endgame, Peter Parker (Tom Holland) wants a holiday from being Spider-Man. His school science trip is heading to Venice, then Prague, and he has a plan: leave the suit in Queens, sit next to MJ (Zendaya) on the flight, and tell her how he feels on a bridge at sunset. Ned Leeds (Jacob Batalon) is meant to help, while Flash Thompson (Tony Revolori) heckles and the teachers, Mr. Harrington (Martin Starr) and Mr. Dell (J. B. Smoove), lose count of their pupils. Then a creature made of canal water tears through Venice. Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) is waiting in Peter’s hotel room that night, with a caped stranger, Quentin Beck (Jake Gyllenhaal), who says the monsters are Elementals and that he has fought them before.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Jon Watts’s second Spider-Man film is a warm, funny school-trip comedy with a superhero film bolted on, and the bolts show. Tom Holland and Zendaya carry the evening; the digital monsters could have stayed at home.

Jon Watts’s second Spider-Man film has the difficult job of following the biggest film its studio has ever made, and its answer is to send a class of sixteen-year-olds to Europe and let them get sunburnt. That is the right answer. Peter Parker (Tom Holland) wants two weeks off, a window seat next to MJ (Zendaya) and a moment on a bridge in Prague; the film wants that too, and every scene that lets him have it is a pleasure. The trouble is the other film running alongside, in which things made of water and fire attack tourist landmarks, and that one is slack.

Holland is the reason to watch. He plays Peter as a boy who has been to space and back and still cannot work out where to put his hands when a girl looks at him, and he gets laughs from a pause as often as from a line. Zendaya gives MJ a flat, watchful deadpan that turns out to be shyness with better armour, and the two of them, side by side on a plane or a tram, are better company than anything the plot brings in. Around them the class is well drawn: Jacob Batalon and Angourie Rice fall into a holiday romance in the airport queue and conduct it with the solemnity of a fifty-year marriage, while Martin Starr and J. B. Smoove play teachers who have long since given up counting heads. Anna B. Sheppard dresses Peter in clothes that look packed by his aunt and, later, in a black suit Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) hands him that the children promptly name after an animal.

Jake Gyllenhaal’s Quentin Beck arrives in a cape and a fishbowl and plays it dead straight, which is the correct choice. He is a tired soldier from somewhere else, kind to Peter in a way nobody else has time to be, and a scene between the two of them over drinks, about what it costs to be the person everyone leans on, is the best written stretch of the film. Chris McKenna and Erik Sommers’s script is at its sharpest here: it understands that Peter is looking for a new adult to tell him what to do, and that this is not a healthy thing to be looking for.

Then the Elementals turn up, and the film stops. A water monster fills a Venice canal; a fire monster stamps through a Prague carnival. Matthew J. Lloyd shoots the cities in warm evening light, terracotta and lamp-glow, and the creatures are dropped into that light with no weight and no texture, so that they look like something happening on a screen inside the film rather than in the square. We were bored during the Prague fight, and we noticed we were bored, which is not how a set piece is supposed to go. Michael Giacchino’s score does its best to sell the danger with brass and choir, but the pictures under it are not frightening and the music cannot make them so.

There is one sequence, in Berlin, in the back half, that we will not describe. It is the one time the film’s action and its ideas are in the same frame, and it unsettled us far more than we expected a 12A to manage: Peter is made to doubt what is in front of him, and editors Dan Lebental and Leigh Folsom Boyd cut it so that we doubt it with him. Claude Paré’s designs for that stretch are the only production design in the film that feels made by hand rather than rendered. It runs perhaps five minutes. We would have taken twenty.

Against Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017), this is the looser and the more scattered film. The first one kept its hero on a small stage and let him fail there. This one keeps saying the word Europe and never quite decides whether it is a comedy about a class trip or a franchise instalment with paperwork to file, and the paperwork wins more often than it should. Marisa Tomei and Jon Favreau, as May and Happy, get a fond running gag and not much else.

Worth an evening if you have a fondness for the character, and probably a better one at home, where the monsters shrink and the jokes do not. It runs 129 minutes and carries a 12A. Stay for the credits; for once it matters.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

69
Positive
19
Mixed
4
Negative
2
The Guardian
5 July 2019 · ★★★★ · Peter Bradshaw
80

The film offers a winning, witty teen-movie take on the post-Endgame MCU, sending Peter Parker on a European school trip. It singles out Tom Holland’s endearing, quick-witted performance as a highlight.

Read the full review →
The Times
27 June 2019 · ★★★★ · Kevin Maher
80

The film justifies its existence with a deliberate first-half setup that pays off in a neat twist and strong performances. It singles out Holland’s comedy timing and Gyllenhaal’s later turn for praise.

Read the full review →
Variety
27 June 2019 · Owen Gleiberman
80*

Holland grows in the role; the film plays with illusion and twists cleverly, making it more urgent and resonant than the previous one, closer to classic Spider-Man films.

Read the full review →
Vulture
3 July 2019 · Bilge Ebiri
80*

The critic calls the second half a brilliantly sustained climax that plays with reality and illusion, delivering a scary answer to Endgame while praising Holland and Zendaya.

Read the full review →
Empire
27 June 2019 · Ben Travis
70*

Far From Home is a light-footed summer blockbuster that faces Endgame’s legacy head-on with wit and energy while proving the MCU is safe in Spider-Man’s hands. The critic singles out the sweet teen romance with MJ and Zendaya’s razor-wire zingers for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
3 July 2019 · Matthew Norman
70*

The follow-up to Endgame is a self-parodic meta exercise that accepts it cannot match its predecessor but delivers a mischievous tone. The critic singles out the neo-John Hughes high school romance and the well-delivered twist for praise amid the absurdity.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Spider-Man: Far From Home worth watching?
Spider-Man: Far From Home is worth an evening for anyone fond of the character, and we scored it 67. Tom Holland and Zendaya make the school-trip comedy a pleasure, but the digital monsters attacking Venice and Prague are weightless and dull. It plays better at home, where the jokes survive and the set pieces shrink.
How long is Spider-Man: Far From Home, and what is it rated?
Spider-Man: Far From Home runs 2h 09m and is rated PG-13 by the MPA in the US. It is an action and adventure film.
Where can I watch Spider-Man: Far From Home in the US?
Spider-Man: Far From Home is streaming on Disney+ in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Spider-Man: Far From Home, and is it suitable for children?
Spider-Man: Far From Home is a 12A, and most of its action is bloodless fights with creatures made of water and fire that we found more tedious than frightening. One sequence in Berlin, later on, makes Peter doubt what he is seeing and unsettled us more than we expected; younger children may find it disorienting. Teenagers will be fine.
How does Spider-Man: Far From Home compare to Spider-Man: Homecoming?
Spider-Man: Far From Home is the looser and more scattered of the two, and Spider-Man: Homecoming is the better film. The first keeps Peter on a small stage with a villain who owns a van and lets him fail there; the sequel keeps saying the word Europe and cannot decide whether it is a comedy or a franchise instalment. Watch Homecoming first.
What should I watch after Spider-Man: Far From Home?
After Spider-Man: Far From Home, try Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017, Fi1m 74): The first one, smaller and tighter, with a villain who owns a van. Then Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (2018, Fi1m 87): Animated, inventive, and it understands the character better than any live-action attempt; and Roman Holiday (1953, Fi1m 88): A European trip, a secret identity, and a romance conducted on a scooter.

Cast

Awards

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie, 2020

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie

If you liked this, try…

  1. Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017, Fi1m 74)The first one, smaller and tighter, with a villain who owns a van.

  2. Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (2018, Fi1m 87)Animated, inventive, and it understands the character better than any live-action attempt.

  3. Roman Holiday (1953, Fi1m 88)A European trip, a secret identity, and a romance conducted on a scooter.

  4. Rushmore (1998, Fi1m 83)A clever boy, an older man he wants to impress, and the fallout.

  5. The Prestige (2006, Fi1m 82)Two men who know exactly how much an audience wants to be fooled.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever