A soldier walking along a dirt path through a palm grove
Film review

The Thin Red Line

1998 · Directed by Terrence Malick · 2h 51m · MPA R

In a sentenceA war film with time for every leaf, but not quite every soldier

Private Robert Witt (Jim Caviezel), First Sergeant Edward Welsh (Sean Penn) and Private Jack Bell (Ben Chaplin) face a war that each understands differently. Around them are officers including Lieutenant Colonel Gordon Tall (Nick Nolte) and Captain James Staros (Elias Koteas). Terrence Malick adapts James Jones’s novel, moving between the soldiers’ experiences and their private thoughts rather than following a single man’s account. As violence intrudes on the natural world, their voices consider what draws people towards destruction and what might survive it. The film places the men’s questions beside images of plants, animals and light.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Terrence Malick’s war film is moving, patient and occasionally too fond of its own questions. John Toll’s photography and the performances make its wandering worthwhile, though some soldiers barely emerge as people.

The Thin Red Line is a moving, absorbing war film, though its soldiers sometimes speak as if they have been asked to explain all human suffering. Terrence Malick, adapting James Jones’s novel, wants to hear what goes through their minds as well as watch what happens to them. He keeps making room for thoughts that have no practical use to a soldier trying to stay alive. At 171 minutes, it asks for patience, but we recommend giving it that time.

John Toll photographs the natural world with enough care that it becomes difficult to treat the landscape as somewhere for a battle to happen. The light makes us want to keep looking, while the attention to plants and animals makes the soldiers seem less entitled to occupy every frame. We found those images unexpectedly upsetting, because they made the men’s impulse to destroy seem worse. Malick spends time looking at living things that cannot explain themselves in a voiceover.

Jim Caviezel’s Private Robert Witt gives the wandering film someone worth staying with. Caviezel makes Witt’s search for meaning feel sincere, and that sincerity is essential when the writing risks sounding pleased with its own seriousness. Sean Penn as First Sergeant Edward Welsh and Elias Koteas as Captain James Staros help keep the questions attached to recognisable people. Their performances make us want to know more about the men, even when Malick seems ready to move on to another speaker.

Editors Leslie Jones, Billy Weber and Saar Klein let the film pass between voices without making one soldier the permanent centre. Their cutting gives the thoughts room to wander, but it does not always give the people speaking them enough time to become distinct. Some characters remain sketches, and the familiar faces cannot supply histories that the film has not given them. This is the caveat we would put first: if following a group of soldiers means learning exactly who everyone is, the interruptions may become wearing.

Jack Fisk’s production design helps keep the soldiers’ surroundings convincing when the talk becomes lofty, allowing the men to belong to the landscape Toll photographs. Hans Zimmer’s music sustains the feeling across changes of speaker, so a move away from someone need not mean losing our concern for him. It can lend too much importance to an already solemn passage, particularly when the voiceovers are also reaching for profundity. But the music helps us stay with a film that repeatedly interrupts its own story to listen to somebody think.

Malick’s voiceovers do sometimes keep asking questions after the images have made us think of them for ourselves. We wanted him to leave more of those questions unspoken, particularly when the words began to make different men sound alike. But his willingness to let soldiers remain bewildered, without hurrying them towards a useful lesson about courage, is one reason this war film stays with us. Give it an uninterrupted evening, and accept that getting to know every man is not part of the offer.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

75
Positive
13
Mixed
5
Negative
1

Most critics admire it, and the praise gathers around the same things: Malick’s images of the Pacific, the way the natural world is filmed as indifferent to the fighting, and the layered voice-overs that turn a Guadalcanal combat picture into a meditation on war, nature and death. Several reviewers set it against Saving Private Ryan, released the same year, and prefer Malick’s refusal of spectacle. Later reappraisals are warmer than the first notices.

The reservations cluster around shape. Even admirers concede the film meanders, and a good number of critics, particularly on first release, find it without a central character or dramatic focus, drifting into hazy poetic effects. Variety expects it to frustrate mainstream audiences; The New York Times calls it intermittently brilliant at best. The spread is wide, from near-unqualified admiration to one outright dismissal. That dissent, from Eye for Film, finds it pretentious and heavy-handed, though it singles out Jim Caviezel’s performance as the private who goes absent among the islanders.

The AV Club
6 October 2010 · A · Keith Phipps
95

The critic highlights how Malick blends the grim WWII story with philosophical voiceovers and nature imagery to explore a pantheistic view of existence and struggle. The film's beauty and coherence make its ambitious ideas feel earned rather than pretentious.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2003 · William Thomas
90*

A major work from a major artist that reaches beyond entertainment to touch the profound; a glorious return for Malick after 20 years.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· Gavin Smith
90*

The critic praises the film as a unique lyric epic poem on war that balances romanticism and dispassion while evading mythic spectacle, unlike Saving Private Ryan. It singles out the film's use of light, voiceover, and Witt's transcendent perspective for conveying the duality of horror and rapture in existence.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
28 September 2010 · Rob Humanick
90*

The critic calls the film a profound philosophical and artistic achievement that surpasses other 1998 war films in depth, praising its ensemble cast, visual poetry, and exploration of war, nature, and humanity. It fuses spiritual inquiry with narrative in a way that defines cinema's essence.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
90*

Malick's masterpiece is an extraordinary, profoundly rich war movie and mythic pantheist meditation on conflict, violence and death in nature. Its multiple voice-overs, flora and fauna imagery, and central metaphor of paradise lost make it a genuinely epic ciné-poem.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
13 October 2016 · Taylor Burns
85*

The critic hails Malick’s film as a stunning meditation on the natural world’s indifference to war rather than a conventional combat story. The lush Pacific imagery and transcendental voice-overs are singled out as the picture’s soul.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Thin Red Line worth watching?
The Thin Red Line is worth watching for anyone prepared to give a war film 171 patient minutes, and we scored it 84. Terrence Malick keeps interrupting the fighting to let soldiers think aloud, and John Toll's photography of the landscape makes those pauses worthwhile. If you need to know exactly who every man is, the wandering may wear on you.
How long is The Thin Red Line, and what is it rated?
The Thin Red Line runs 2h 51m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a drama and history film.
Where can I watch The Thin Red Line in the US?
The Thin Red Line is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The Thin Red Line, and is it suitable for children?
The Thin Red Line carries a UK 15 certificate, so it is not for children, though it is a contemplative war film rather than a relentless one. The battle scenes are upsetting largely because Malick has shown us so much living landscape before the men set about destroying it. Teenagers of fifteen and over with some patience should manage it.
How does The Thin Red Line compare to Come and See?
The Thin Red Line and Come and See are both war films that set human violence against the natural world, but Malick's film pauses to let soldiers wonder aloud while Klimov's gives a boy no such relief. Come and See is the harder, more punishing watch and the one we recommend more strongly. Malick's is gentler and longer, and better for a viewer who wants time to think rather than to endure.
Is The Thin Red Line based on a true story or a book?
The Thin Red Line is based on James Jones's novel of the same name, adapted by Terrence Malick. Malick moves between several soldiers' experiences and their private thoughts rather than following one man's account, which is his own approach rather than a straightforward retelling. You do not need to have read the book to follow the film.
What should I watch after The Thin Red Line?
After The Thin Red Line, try Beau Travail (1999, Fi1m 86): Military discipline and desire play out through bodies, landscape and sparse dialogue. Then Come and See (1985, Fi1m 92): The natural world offers little comfort in this harrowing account of war; and The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp (1943, Fi1m 91): British military honour receives an affectionate examination that does not spare its failures.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1999

Nominated
Best Cinematography
Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Film Editing
Nominated
Best Original Dramatic Score
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Sound

Berlin International Film Festival, 1999

Won
Golden Bear

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Burmese Harp (1956) · not reviewed yetA soldier’s spiritual questions take shape through music and the work of mourning.

  2. Beau Travail (1999, Fi1m 86)Military discipline and desire play out through bodies, landscape and sparse dialogue.

  3. Come and See (1985, Fi1m 92)The natural world offers little comfort in this harrowing account of war.

  4. The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp (1943, Fi1m 91)British military honour receives an affectionate examination that does not spare its failures.

  5. A Hidden Life (2019, Fi1m 82)A quieter Malick film about the daily cost of refusing to obey.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever