Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) and Newt (Carrie Henn) stand amid burning debris and survivors
Film review

Aliens

1986 · Directed by James Cameron · 2h 17m · MPA R

In a sentenceThe marines bring all the hardware, but we would still rather stand next to Sigourney Weaver

Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) joins a force of space marines to confront an alien threat. Corporal Hicks (Michael Biehn), Private Hudson (Bill Paxton) and Private Vasquez (Jenette Goldstein) are among the soldiers, alongside Lieutenant Gorman (William Hope) and Sergeant Apone (Al Matthews). Their military hardware meets creatures that turn the mission into a struggle to survive. Carrie Henn plays Newt, a child with whom Ripley forms a protective bond. James Cameron writes and directs this science-fiction action thriller, following Ripley into another encounter with the creatures and bringing more people into their path.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

James Cameron’s Aliens is an exceptional action thriller, with Sigourney Weaver giving the military spectacle a human centre. Some marines are little more than types, but Ripley gives us reason to care who survives.

James Cameron understands that a sequel needs a reason to exist beyond another encounter with the same creatures. Aliens supplies one by sending Ripley back into danger with space marines and making a war film out of the confrontation. The increase in firepower changes the expectations: trained soldiers with serious equipment ought to have a better chance, which gives Cameron something useful to work against. We recommend it without much hesitation, though its appetite for action sometimes leaves the supporting characters with little to do beyond announce their personalities.

Sigourney Weaver is the reason that escalation does not become tiring in the wrong way. Her Ripley has the resourcefulness an action lead needs, but Weaver allows fear to remain visible inside the competence. The relationship with Carrie Henn’s Newt gives that fear a particular focus, and Cameron’s screenplay is at its most persuasive when protection means practical work rather than declarations. The maternal emphasis can feel a little heavily insisted upon, but Weaver makes Ripley’s concern for the child convincing without turning her into a different person.

Adrian Biddle’s cinematography makes the encounters with the creatures readable without making them feel safely contained. That is essential here: the action needs enough clarity for us to understand the danger, rather than merely accept that something noisy is happening. Peter Lamont’s production design gives the high-tech environment and military hardware a solidity that helps explain the marines’ confidence. We can believe that these people expect their equipment to deal with whatever they find.

Ray Lovejoy’s editing gives the early build-up room to establish Ripley before the action starts demanding so much attention. At 137 minutes, the film is long enough to make impatience a risk, but the preparation is doing useful work. Once the encounters begin, the pace leaves little space to recover, and James Horner’s score keeps the anxiety present between them. We were frightened by how little comfort all that military hardware provided when the marines faced the creatures.

The marines are less carefully written than Ripley, and Cameron’s screenplay sometimes settles for rowdiness where another distinguishing detail would help. Bill Paxton’s Private Hudson and Jenette Goldstein’s Private Vasquez belong to an ensemble whose broad outlines are easy to grasp, but that speed comes at a cost. There are people here we understand chiefly through their place in the unit. A few quieter exchanges would have helped us care about more of them.

Turning horror into a war film does make the creatures more familiar, and anyone hoping chiefly for mystery may find the repeated confrontations too explicit. Cameron accepts that loss and uses the practical effects to make proximity unpleasant instead. The creatures have a physical presence that remains troubling even when we know a confrontation is coming. That is a sound choice for action-horror, though it means the film’s quieter dread must compete with a great deal of weaponry.

Give Aliens the full evening rather than treating it as a succession of action scenes to dip into. The slow opening needs attention because Ripley is the reason the later pressure works. We would not choose it to unwind.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

86
Positive
11
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The consensus is strongly positive: most critics welcome James Cameron’s shift from confined horror towards military action, finding that the sequel expands the original without losing its capacity to frighten. Praise centres on Cameron’s control of tension, the physical force of the action and the practical effects. Sigourney Weaver is the clearest point of agreement, with reviews crediting her performance as Ripley with giving the spectacle emotional weight; several also value the character’s resourcefulness and maternal role.

The differences concern how much that expansion costs in atmosphere, originality and character. Enthusiasm ranges from wholehearted approval to qualified admiration: The New York Times finds the script thin and overwhelmed by technique, while Slant Magazine admires the action and use of space but objects to archetypal characters and the treatment of gender. Elsewhere, reservations focus on diminished surprise and a preference for the original’s more restrained horror.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Alan Jones
100

This sequel surpasses the original in sheer spectacle as Ripley joins marines to confront colonised aliens in a hi-tech house of horrors. Cameron masterfully controls tension and pace for shocks, suspense and an Oscar-winning fright-fest.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
18 July 1986 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The film is a superb example of filmmaking craft and intense thriller that delivers on its promise to frighten, though it leaves the viewer drained and anxious rather than entertained. It singles out Sigourney Weaver's strong, sympathetic performance as the thread holding everything together along with the professional special effects.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
95*

The critic calls Aliens the perfect sequel that expands on the original while standing alone, crediting Cameron's vision and nerve in turning it into a war movie with an army of aliens. They single out the intense, physical execution of the action and Ripley's resourcefulness as a strong female lead.

Read the full review →
Total Film
27 October 2014 · Kevin Harley
90*

The critic praises Cameron's sequel for preserving what worked in the original and multiplying it into a war movie, while still delivering horror through sudden encounters and strong scripting. They highlight the maternal themes with Ripley and the ageless practical effects as making it state-of-the-art action-horror.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
18 July 1986 · Sheila Benson
80*

It is a perfectly honorable sequel that is taut, inexorably paced and successful when Weaver is onscreen, though more blaster action than Gothic future-horror. It singles out Sigourney Weaver as the white-hot core with fine, irascible dialogue and athleticism.

Read the full review →
Time Out
9 July 2014 · TCh
80*

The sequel builds slowly to develop Ripley's multi-dimensional character while escalating the action with hi-tech hardware and hordes of aliens. Cameron's work maintains a tension between masculine and feminine qualities, culminating in an epic battle.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Aliens worth watching?
Aliens is worth watching for anyone who wants a war film built around a horror threat, and we scored it 91. Sigourney Weaver keeps fear visible inside Ripley's competence, and her bond with Newt gives the escalating action a human reason to matter. The marines are thinly written, and it is not a film to unwind with.
How long is Aliens, and what is it rated?
Aliens runs 2h 17m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is an action and thriller film.
Where can I watch Aliens in the US?
Aliens is streaming on Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, The Roku Channel and Apple TV in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from $3.99. It leaves The Roku Channel on 1 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Aliens, and is it suitable for children?
Aliens carries an 18 certificate and is not suitable for children. The practical effects make the creatures physically unpleasant at close quarters, and the confrontations are frequent and explicit once they begin. Teenagers used to action-horror may cope; the squeamish, or anyone who finds sustained anxiety exhausting, should expect little relief between encounters.
How does Aliens compare to Alien?
Aliens turns the horror of Alien into a war film, trading patient confinement for firepower and a full ensemble of marines. The earlier film is the more frightening of the two, its dread building slowly in one ship; the sequel is the more exciting, with Sigourney Weaver giving the spectacle its centre. Choose Alien for mystery, Aliens for pressure.
Do you need to have seen the other Alien films before Aliens?
Aliens can be followed without having seen the other Alien films, since James Cameron spends its slow opening re-establishing Ripley before the marines arrive. It is a sequel in spirit as well as name, though, and the creatures' familiarity is part of its design. Newcomers who want the fear intact should start with the first film.
What should I watch after Aliens?
After Aliens, try The Terminator (1984, Fi1m 88): Cameron keeps the machinery frightening and the people worth worrying about. Then The Wages of Fear (1953, Fi1m 90): Another dangerous assignment where confidence offers little protection against mounting physical peril; and The Descent (2005, Fi1m 85): A capable group enters hostile territory, with cramped space making every decision worse.
What order should I watch the Alien films in?
Release order is the safe choice for Alien, and it is the order our collection page lists them in. Aliens is number 2 of the 4 Alien titles on Fi1m; before it comes Alien and after it Alien³. The full order.

Part of · 2 of 4

Alien

4 films on Fi1m · 1979–1997 · average 76 · best Alien 92

All 4 in order

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1987

Nominated
Best Actress
Nominated
Best Film Editing
Nominated
Best Original Score
Nominated
Best Production Design
Nominated
Best Sound
Won
Best Sound Editing
Won
Best Visual Effects

BAFTA Film Awards, 1987

Nominated
Best Makeup and Hair
Nominated
Best Sound
Won
Best Special Visual Effects

Hugo Awards, 1987

Won
Best Dramatic Presentation

Japan Academy Prize for Outstanding Foreign Language Film, 1987

Nominated
Japan Academy Prize for Outstanding Foreign Language Film

Saturn Awards, 1987

Won
Best Director
Won
Best Science Fiction Film

Golden Globes, 1986

Nominated
Best Actress – Motion Picture Drama

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Terminator (1984, Fi1m 88)Cameron keeps the machinery frightening and the people worth worrying about.

  2. The Wages of Fear (1953, Fi1m 90)Another dangerous assignment where confidence offers little protection against mounting physical peril.

  3. The Descent (2005, Fi1m 85)A capable group enters hostile territory, with cramped space making every decision worse.

  4. Train to Busan (2016, Fi1m 84)Sustained creature attacks become more distressing because the human attachments are carefully established.

  5. Tremors (1990, Fi1m 82)For creature suspense with clear geography, practical ingenuity and rather more room to laugh.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever