Gabe Walker (Sylvester Stallone) and Jessie Deighan (Janine Turner) on a snowy ledge
Film review

Cliffhanger

1993 · Directed by Renny Harlin · 1h 53m · MPA R

In a sentenceSylvester Stallone has more trouble with the dialogue than the climbing

Gabe Walker (Sylvester Stallone) faces a struggle for survival in the mountains, where climbing and fighting leave little room for error. Hal Tucker (Michael Rooker), Jessie Deighan (Janine Turner) and Qualen (John Lithgow) are among the people caught up in the action. As confrontations unfold on the mountain, the terrain itself adds to the danger of each encounter. Craig Fairbrass plays Delmar and Leon plays Kynette in Renny Harlin’s action thriller, written by Stallone and Michael France. Keeping a grip and finding a foothold become matters of survival.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Cliffhanger earns its thrills through climbing, height and forceful action, with Sylvester Stallone a solid centre. The dialogue is poor and the noise sometimes excessive, but Renny Harlin makes the mountain danger convincing enough to recommend it.

Renny Harlin’s Cliffhanger is a good action thriller whose climbing is considerably more persuasive than its dialogue. It has enough physical suspense to survive some poor writing, though the exchanges between characters are rarely as interesting as their next move across the mountain. Harlin understands the simple appeal of watching someone find a foothold where there appears to be none. He is less reliable when everyone stops to talk.

Alex Thomson’s cinematography makes the height matter by allowing us to see the climber against the space around him. The circling view of Stallone on the rock face is especially effective, giving us time to consider how exposed his body is. We felt our stomachs tighten because the shot lets us register how little is holding him there. The photography establishes a danger that needs almost no explanation, and the film is wise to give it such prominence.

Sylvester Stallone plays Gabe Walker with the physical conviction this sort of film needs, even when the screenplay gives him little worth saying. Watching him climb, we believe the effort involved, and that is enough to keep us interested in the next move. Michael Rooker, as Hal Tucker, and Janine Turner, as Jessie Deighan, bring a useful directness to parts that could disappear against the scenery. John Lithgow gives Qualen enough relish to make some poor lines enjoyable, though not enough menace to make him the chief source of anxiety.

The cave fight gives production designer John Vallone a different problem: keeping close-quarters violence part of the same harsh mountain environment. The surroundings make the fighting feel uncomfortable, while the choreography remains easy to read. Frank J. Urioste’s editing helps us follow the physical struggle without reducing it to disconnected impacts. That clarity is welcome even when Harlin seems more interested in the force of a blow than the person receiving it.

Trevor Jones’s music can be too insistent, pressing for excitement when the climbing has already supplied it. A quieter accompaniment would sometimes have given the images more room, particularly when the height alone is enough to make the situation alarming. Harlin’s fondness for force becomes tiring when the fighting, cutting and music all demand attention at once. A few effects also look artificial enough to make the danger briefly easier to dismiss.

The screenplay, credited to Stallone and Michael France, is the main reason not to rate the film higher. Too much of the talk sounds borrowed from other action thrillers, and the characters rarely surprise us once they start explaining themselves. An action thriller needs enough personality to make repeated confrontations feel different; Cliffhanger too often relies on another burst of violence to do that job. Harlin sustains interest through the variety of the action, but the pauses expose how little the writing has added.

At 113 minutes, the film would benefit from shorter stretches between its physical challenges, although Harlin rarely lets us drift far from another one. Those who need an action thriller to be plausible throughout will have more objections than we do, especially when the familiar lines start arriving. If heights are a pleasure when somebody else is dealing with them, this is a good choice.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

68
Positive
7
Mixed
2
Negative
3

Most critics come down in favour, seven of twelve, and the praise gathers in one place: the mountain footage. The stunt work and the climbing sequences filmed at altitude are what the reviews remember, and Renny Harlin’s staging of the set-pieces is credited more than once as the best work of his career. The opening scene draws admiration, and several critics treat the film as the picture that put Stallone back on his feet.

The reservations sit almost entirely with the script. Clichéd dialogue, a weak villain and a plot that strains belief once the action stops turn up in favourable and unfavourable reviews alike. The spread is wide, from warm approval to outright dismissal. The New Yorker finds the early excitement giving way to cheapness and nonsense, the Los Angeles Times objects to the sadistic violence, and both Time Out and The Independent argue the vertical drama never produces vertigo. Later reappraisals are warmer than some notices from 1993.

The New York Times
28 May 1993 · Janet Maslin
90*

The critic finds the film succeeds spectacularly at generating suspense and cold-sweat thrills through its death-defying action sequences and vertiginous visuals. Dialogue is the main drawback, but the sophistication of the effects and the breathtaking mountain backdrop provide the chief pleasures.

Read the full review →
Variety
24 May 1993 · Todd McCarthy
90*

The critic calls it an ideal summer popcorn picture that delivers nonstop visceral thrills and vertiginous footage unlike anything seen before. Harlin’s pacing and the convincing verisimilitude of the mountain action sequences are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
2 May 2016 · Nick Schager
85*

The critic calls it one of Sylvester Stallone’s finest starring vehicles, with arguably the best opening scene in modern action cinema. They single out the expert staging of suspenseful sequences, the imposing snowcapped setting, sterling stunt work, and Renny Harlin’s direction as the pinnacle of his career.

Read the full review →
Empire
· Mark Dinning
80*

The review praises the tense, vertigo-inducing set-pieces and taut suspense as action filmmaking at its best, calling it a career high for both Harlin and Stallone despite some script clichés.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

High adventure and vertigo blend with blood and bullets to make this tension-packed tall tale a spectacular avalanche of dizzying escapism. Nail-biting stunts and photography that's close to the edge are the true stars of this Rockies-set Die Hard, directed with breathless energy by Renny Harlin.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
28 May 1993 · Roger Ebert
80*

The film delivers on its promise of big-budget stunts and special effects as an entertaining action machine, even if the plot strains credibility. Ebert praises the thrilling sequences involving Stallone dangling from cliffs and the work of the stunt performers under Renny Harlin's direction.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Cliffhanger worth watching?
Cliffhanger is worth watching for anyone who enjoys watching a climber find a foothold where there appears to be none, and we scored it 74. Renny Harlin makes the height and the fighting convincing, and Sylvester Stallone climbs with real effort. The dialogue is poor and the music too insistent, so those who need plausibility throughout will object more than we do.
How long is Cliffhanger, and what is it rated?
Cliffhanger runs 1h 53m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is an action and adventure film.
Where can I watch Cliffhanger in the US?
Cliffhanger is streaming on Tubi and Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Cliffhanger, and is it suitable for children?
Cliffhanger carries a UK 15 certificate and is not suitable for children. The violence is forceful and frequent, with a close-quarters cave fight that is uncomfortable to watch, and Harlin is more interested in the impact of a blow than the person receiving it. The climbing itself is alarming enough to trouble anyone who dislikes heights.
How does Cliffhanger compare to The Wages of Fear?
Cliffhanger and The Wages of Fear both build suspense from dangerous work and the smallest physical mistake, but Clouzot's film is the finer of the two. It is patient and quiet, letting a truckload of nitroglycerine do the frightening; Harlin's film piles on fighting, cutting and music at once. Choose Cliffhanger for immediate physical thrills, The Wages of Fear for slow, hard tension.
What should I watch after Cliffhanger?
After Cliffhanger, try The Wages of Fear (1953, Fi1m 90): Dangerous work, desperate men and suspense built from the smallest physical mistake. Then Touching the Void (2003, Fi1m 87): Mountain survival stripped of action banter, with every movement carrying a cost; and A Hard Day (2014, Fi1m 79): A Korean thriller whose escalating physical predicaments have a welcome nasty wit.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1994

Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Sound Editing
Nominated
Best Visual Effects

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Wages of Fear (1953, Fi1m 90)Dangerous work, desperate men and suspense built from the smallest physical mistake.

  2. The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (1974) · not reviewed yetAnother confined thriller, but this time the dialogue earns its place.

  3. Runaway Train (1985) · not reviewed yetA harsher survival thriller, with weather and machinery making escape painfully difficult.

  4. Touching the Void (2003, Fi1m 87)Mountain survival stripped of action banter, with every movement carrying a cost.

  5. A Hard Day (2014, Fi1m 79)A Korean thriller whose escalating physical predicaments have a welcome nasty wit.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever