Sam (Natalie Portman) floating on her back in a swimming pool
Film review

Garden State

2004 · Directed by Zach Braff · 1h 42m · MPA R

In a sentenceNatalie Portman deserves a holiday after cheering up Zach Braff

Andrew Largeman (Zach Braff), a struggling actor, returns to suburban New Jersey for his mother’s funeral. Medicated and emotionally numb, he reconnects with old friends in the place he has been reluctant to revisit, while facing tensions within his family. He meets Sam (Natalie Portman), and their developing romance gives him another reason to examine how he lives and what he wants from other people. His visit becomes a chance to consider his relationships, his vulnerabilities and the possibility of taking a different approach to his life.

Fi1m review

Zach Braff’s uneven homecoming comedy is worth seeing for Natalie Portman and Peter Sarsgaard. Its humour and tenderness survive a script that becomes too pleased with its own discoveries.

Garden State is a likeable, uneven homecoming comedy whose cast makes the familiar story worth an evening. Zach Braff writes, directs and plays Andrew Largeman, a struggling actor returning to New Jersey for his mother’s funeral. He wants to show how an emotionally numb young man might begin taking an interest in other people again. The humour is gentle, and for a while that seems exactly the right approach to someone who has trouble feeling much at all.

Braff’s performance suits the material’s hesitancy, although Andrew can be a limiting centre for a film so interested in unusual people. Peter Sarsgaard, as Mark, supplies a welcome resistance to the sweetness. There is something pleasingly unforced about him amid Braff’s more conspicuous efforts to be offbeat. A homecoming comedy needs its supporting characters to seem capable of carrying on when the visitor leaves, and Sarsgaard gives us that impression without making a fuss.

Natalie Portman does more demanding work as Sam, the woman with whom Andrew begins a romance. We were moved by Sam’s eagerness to connect: Portman plays it with enough uncertainty to suggest how easily she could be hurt. The performance gives the romance a tenderness that the writing cannot always supply. Braff asks Sam to do too much of the work of helping Andrew recover, and does not give her feelings the same attention.

Lawrence Sher’s cinematography makes suburban New Jersey look worth returning to, helping us understand the attraction of a place Andrew has dreaded revisiting. Judy Becker’s production design gives those surroundings an inviting familiarity, so home never feels entirely lost to him. Both contribute to the film’s welcoming quality, though the carefully arranged oddness can make its discomfort seem a little too easy to live with. We need to feel what Andrew dislikes about being here, too.

Myron Kerstein’s editing allows the comic diversions room, and several of those digressions have more life than the main story. The episodic shape is not a problem in itself. The difficulty is that Braff keeps interrupting discoveries we can make for ourselves with dialogue that explains what Andrew is learning. The father-son material suffers most from this urge to tidy complicated feelings into something reassuring, and the writing becomes less persuasive as it strains for importance.

Chad Fischer’s music is sympathetic to the film’s gentleness, but the pop-song soundtrack is less inclined to leave us alone. The songs lend warmth to Andrew’s tentative interest in the people around him, and their appeal is easy to understand. Too often, though, they tell us how much a moment means before the actors have had time to make it matter. Combined with Braff’s increasingly explanatory writing, that insistence makes the romance feel less spontaneous.

The homecoming comedy is allowed some self-absorption: returning to familiar people can make anyone wonder what became of the person they expected to be. Braff understands that unease, but he is too keen to give it a reassuring answer. Watch it for the awkward romance and the actors who keep it alive. Allow for a little unsolicited advice.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

66
Positive
9
Mixed
3
Negative
1

Most critics like Garden State, and the reviews lean clearly positive. The praise gathers around Zach Braff’s debut as writer and director, which several find more thoughtful and assured than a first film has any right to be, and around the cast. Natalie Portman is named again and again as the reason the film works, with Peter Sarsgaard close behind. More than one critic reads it as a warm reply to The Graduate: a numbed young man comes home to New Jersey and finds something worth staying for.

The reservations are about the ending and the indulgence. The third act is where the film falters for many, its epiphany judged too neat and too loud; others find the whole thing episodic and sentimental. The spread is wide, running from warm admiration to open irritation. The Guardian calls the anticipated father-son confrontation a damp squib, and Time Out goes furthest, treating the film as quirky cuteness and mush and a sign that American indie cinema has gone soft.

Los Angeles Times
28 July 2004 · Kevin Thomas
80*

The critic calls the film a deceptively quirky homecoming comedy that deepens into a note of redemption with unexpected depth and grace in Braff's writing and directing debut. He singles out the original offbeat climactic epiphany and the sterling ensemble cast, particularly Peter Sarsgaard and Natalie Portman.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Dave Aldridge
80

Braff's thoughtful script and assured direction as writer-director impress in this familiar story of self-examination, with uniformly excellent performances especially from Portman and Sarsgaard. It falters near the end but remains a fine debut.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2011 · Olly Richards
70*

Braff's directorial debut is a sophisticated take on familiar themes of hometown dislocation and middle-youth angst, refreshed with humour and visual invention. Natalie Portman is singled out as the film's magic ingredient, delivering an entrancing performance as the free-spirited Sam.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · ****** · Nina Caplan
70*

The critic finds Garden State slight but absolutely charming, praising its heart and fun despite being sentimental with a predictable plot arc. Natalie Portman stands out as an adorable pathological liar whose performance gives the film its appeal.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
27 July 2004 · Jonny Leahan
70*

The critic praises Braff for deftly delivering a dark comedy of real substance and heart in his debut as writer-director-star. The film follows a struggling actor returning home for his mother's funeral, reconnecting with friends and beginning a romance that helps him embrace life's complexities.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
6 August 2004 · Roger Ebert
70*

The film follows a young man awakening from emotional numbness after returning home for his mother's funeral and meeting an appealing woman. It draws comparisons to The Graduate while noting its meandering but smart and unconventional style with sharp details.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Garden State worth watching?
Garden State is worth watching for anyone who enjoys a gentle homecoming comedy carried by its actors, and we scored it 71. Natalie Portman and Peter Sarsgaard keep the awkward romance and the New Jersey oddities alive, while Zach Braff's script increasingly explains what we could work out for ourselves. Expect tenderness, humour and a little unsolicited advice.
How long is Garden State, and what is it rated?
Garden State runs 1h 42m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a comedy and drama film.
Where can I watch Garden State in the US?
Garden State is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Garden State, and is it suitable for children?
Garden State carries a 15 certificate in the UK and an R rating in the US, so it is not a film for children. Its humour is gentle and nothing in it is designed to frighten; the story concerns a medicated young man returning home for his mother's funeral and beginning a romance. Older teenagers and adults are its natural audience.
How does Garden State compare to Harold and Maude?
Garden State is the gentler and more reassuring of the two films, while Harold and Maude is the sharper, funnier and, for us, the better. Both follow a withdrawn young man whose misery is interrupted by someone determined to reach him, and both scripts grow too pleased with themselves. Hal Ashby's film keeps its morbid courtship believable throughout; Braff's leans on Portman to do the work.
What should I watch after Garden State?
After Garden State, try Harold and Maude (1971, Fi1m 81): Another withdrawn young man meets someone determined to interrupt his arrangements for being miserable. Then The Station Agent (2003, Fi1m 82): For loneliness, unlikely friendship and humour that never requires anybody to be fixed; and Submarine (2010, Fi1m 82): For awkward romance, dry humour and a hero who needs less encouragement.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Harold and Maude (1971, Fi1m 81)Another withdrawn young man meets someone determined to interrupt his arrangements for being miserable.

  2. The Station Agent (2003, Fi1m 82)For loneliness, unlikely friendship and humour that never requires anybody to be fixed.

  3. Submarine (2010, Fi1m 82)For awkward romance, dry humour and a hero who needs less encouragement.

  4. Linda Linda Linda (2005) · not reviewed yetFor hesitant friendships and music that gives awkward young people something to share.

  5. The Worst Person in the World (2021, Fi1m 84)For romantic indecision treated with more curiosity about the woman doing the choosing.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever