Alana Kane (Alana Haim) and Gary Valentine (Cooper Hoffman) running through a field
Film review

Licorice Pizza

2021 · Directed by Paul Thomas Anderson · 2h 13m · MPA R

In a sentenceA fifteen-year-old with a business plan, a twenty-five-year-old without one, and a waterbed shop between them

Encino, in the San Fernando Valley, 1973. Gary Valentine (Cooper Hoffman), fifteen, is a child actor with a few credits, a sharp suit and a manager in his mother, Momma Anita (Mary Elizabeth Ellis). On school picture day he spots Alana Kane (Alana Haim), twenty-five, handing out combs as the photographer’s assistant, and asks her to dinner. She tells him he is a child. She turns up anyway. When Gary needs an adult to accompany him to New York for a television appearance, Alana goes, and afterwards drifts into his orbit: his auditions, his agent Mary Grady (Harriet Sansom Harris), and his latest idea, a waterbed business run out of a shopfront with a phone and a sign. She has no idea what she wants. He is sure he wants her.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Paul Thomas Anderson’s 1970s Valley comedy runs on two leads who had never acted and look as if they have never done anything else. It rambles, sometimes to a fault, and one running joke should have gone. We recommend it warmly anyway.

Paul Thomas Anderson has made a film about hanging about. Encino, in the San Fernando Valley, 1973. Gary Valentine (Cooper Hoffman) is fifteen, a child actor on his way out and a salesman by temperament. Alana Kane (Alana Haim) is twenty-five, assisting a school photographer, living at home, and has no plan at all. He asks her to dinner on picture day. She says no, then turns up. The rest of Licorice Pizza is the two of them drifting through a year of schemes and detours, and we liked it a great deal, with reservations.

Neither Hoffman nor Haim had acted before, and the film belongs to them. Hoffman gives Gary a round, open face and a patter learned from grown-ups, and Anderson lets us see how tiresome that could get without ever letting it. Haim has the harder part. Alana scowls, strides, snaps at children and is rude to nearly everyone, and she is the film’s centre because she is the only person in it who does not know what she wants. Early on, Gary rings her after their date and neither of them speaks. They sit in separate rooms with the receivers to their ears and breathe. It moved us more than two people breathing down a telephone has any business doing. They are not in love so much as unwilling to hang up.

Anderson shares the camera credit with Michael Bauman, and they shoot the Valley in a warm brown haze, late light coming sideways through smog, with people running in it. Everybody in this film runs, towards things that will have moved by the time they arrive. Florencia Martin’s production design gives them a restaurant with red leather booths, a pinball palace and a waterbed showroom in a strip mall with one phone and a hand-painted sign. Andy Jurgensen lets scenes run past their punchline and then cuts hard into the next, so the scenes accumulate rather than build. Jonny Greenwood’s score is used sparingly; the records of the period carry it, and David Bowie’s “Life on Mars?” over the two of them walking is the best stretch of picture and sound Anderson has put together in years.

The set pieces are what most critics have written about, and they are right to. Bradley Cooper plays Jon Peters, a hairdresser turned producer who introduces himself by the name of his famous girlfriend and threatens a van full of teenagers while buying a waterbed. We laughed harder than at anything else in the film, and then, when Alana takes a lorry with no petrol in it down a long hill in reverse, we stopped laughing and held our breath. Sean Penn and Tom Waits turn up as Jack Holden and Rex Blau, an old actor and an old director, drunk and unsafe around a motorbike. Harriet Sansom Harris has one scene as the agent Mary Grady, in a small office with a nervous Alana, and walks off with it. Benny Safdie is quieter and sadder as Joel Wachs, a councilman Alana goes to work for.

Now the reservations. John Michael Higgins plays Jerry Frick, who owns a Japanese restaurant and speaks to his Japanese wife in a mock accent. It happens twice. Anderson presumably means the joke to be on Frick, but the camera does not stay long enough on the wife’s face to make that clear, and the cinema we saw it in went quiet both times. It is the one thing we would cut. The other problem is shape. Wachs and his troubles arrive late and pull Alana into a story the film has not left room for, and at 133 minutes it could lose a quarter of an hour without anyone noticing.

Then there is the age gap, which one critic found creepy and most did not mention. We were uneasy, and we think the film wants us to be. Alana says the numbers aloud more than once. Anderson keeps the two of them at the point of not-quite, and the film is at its most honest when she looks around at Gary’s friends and asks herself what a woman her age is doing there. It is a fair question and the film does not entirely answer it.

This is Anderson back in the Valley of Boogie Nights without that film’s engine, and closer in temperature to Punch-Drunk Love: sunny, sore, a little embarrassed by its own feelings. It is a 15 certificate. Watch it with the window open on a warm night. It is a film about a place where nothing much happens, and it minds that it doesn’t.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

82
Positive
28
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics love this one, and they agree on why. Twenty-eight of twenty-nine reviews are positive, and nearly all describe it as Anderson’s lightest and sunniest film, a loose 1970s coming-of-age comedy set in the San Fernando Valley. The praise clusters on the two first-time leads: Alana Haim is called a natural star in review after review, and Cooper Hoffman is rated almost as highly. The period detail, the soundtrack and the supporting cameos, Bradley Cooper’s in particular, are singled out repeatedly.

The reservations are about shape and about the romance itself. Several critics find the episodic structure baggy and think the digressions crowd out the central pair; The Hollywood Reporter and Vulture both argue the love story is the weakest element on screen. The spread is narrow. The lone dissenter is The Times, which finds the relationship between a 15-year-old boy and a 25-year-old woman creepy rather than charming, a charge the Evening Standard directly rejects.

Little White Lies
4 January 2022 · 5/5/5 · David Jenkins
100

The review calls it Anderson's most purely pleasurable film to date, a silky-smooth love story about two people never quite in love at the same time that excels at world-building and character interplay. The newcomers Alana Haim and Cooper Hoffman are singled out for shining in their roles.

Read the full review →
Time Out
15 November 2021 · ★★★★★ · Phil de Semlyen
100

The critic hails it as PTA's sunniest and most buoyant film yet, a free-spirited coming-of-age yarn with boundless energy and dizzying possibility. The greatest coup is singled out as the casting of the two novice leads who are born to their roles.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
15 November 2021 · A · David Ehrlich
95

Calls it a euphorically hilarious coming-of-age comedy and perfect slice of '70s nostalgia with standout performances from Cooper Hoffman, Alana Haim, and Bradley Cooper. Highlights the anarchic set pieces and PTA's ultra-dry comedic wit as making it one of the year's best.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
15 November 2021 · Justin Chang
90*

The film is a valentine to the Valley and to Alana Haim in a boisterous, bighearted shaggy-dog epic full of Hollywood tall tales and entrepreneurial schemes. Chang singles out Haim’s star turn and the film’s affectionate yet clear-eyed portrait of 1970s Los Angeles.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
15 November 2021
90*

The critic calls it Anderson's gentlest, most endearing picture to date, a fully immersive and laidback study of youthful infatuation that gains momentum through its ambling structure. Alana Haim's marvellous debut performance as the disaffected twentysomething is singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
15 November 2021 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

Anderson’s latest is a romance about a teen boy wooing an older woman, starring two extraordinary newcomers and stuffed with fabulously hammy A-list cameos. It is hypnotically gorgeous, funny and romantic, freewheeling from scene to scene with absolute mastery.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Licorice Pizza worth watching?
Licorice Pizza is worth watching for anyone happy to spend two hours drifting through the San Fernando Valley of 1973 with two people who cannot decide what they are to each other, and we scored it 80. It rambles, one running joke should have been cut, and it could lose a quarter of an hour. We recommend it warmly anyway, chiefly for Cooper Hoffman and Alana Haim.
How long is Licorice Pizza, and what is it rated?
Licorice Pizza runs 2h 13m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a drama and comedy film.
Where can I watch Licorice Pizza in the US?
Licorice Pizza is streaming on Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV and Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Licorice Pizza, and is it suitable for children?
Licorice Pizza is a 15 certificate in the UK and R-rated in the US, and it is neither violent nor frightening; it is a comedy about a fifteen-year-old and a twenty-five-year-old hanging about together. The rating comes from language, adult situations and drink, and the age gap between the leads is something the film asks us to feel uneasy about. It is not for children.
How does Licorice Pizza compare to Boogie Nights?
Licorice Pizza is Paul Thomas Anderson back in the same hazy San Fernando Valley as Boogie Nights, but without that film's engine. The earlier film has a rise-and-fall story that goes somewhere; the later one is a year of schemes and detours, sunnier and sorer. Choose Boogie Nights if you want a plot, Licorice Pizza if you want a mood and two first-time leads.
What should I watch after Licorice Pizza?
After Licorice Pizza, try Boogie Nights (1997, Fi1m 86): Anderson’s earlier Valley, same haze, with a plot that actually goes somewhere. Then Dazed and Confused (1993, Fi1m 86): One long Texas afternoon in 1976 where nobody decides anything and everybody keeps moving; and Rushmore (1998, Fi1m 83): Another schoolboy with schemes and a crush who cannot hear the word no.

Cast

Awards

David di Donatello for Best International Film, 2023

Nominated
David di Donatello for Best International Film

Academy Awards, 2022

Nominated
Best Picture

National Board of Review Award for Best Film, 2021

Won
National Board of Review Award for Best Film

If you liked this, try…

  1. Boogie Nights (1997, Fi1m 86)Anderson’s earlier Valley, same haze, with a plot that actually goes somewhere.

  2. Dazed and Confused (1993, Fi1m 86)One long Texas afternoon in 1976 where nobody decides anything and everybody keeps moving.

  3. Rushmore (1998, Fi1m 83)Another schoolboy with schemes and a crush who cannot hear the word no.

  4. Gregory's Girl (1980) · not reviewed yetCumbernauld, a hopeless teenage boy, and the girl who knows more than he does.

  5. Y Tu Mamá También (2001, Fi1m 87)Two Mexican teenagers, an older woman and a road; the country changes around them.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever