Mike Waters (River Phoenix) walking along an empty rural highway
Film review

My Own Private Idaho

1991 · Directed by Gus Van Sant · 1h 44m · MPA R

In a sentenceRiver Phoenix falls asleep and we want someone to stay until he wakes

Mike Waters (River Phoenix) and Scott Favor (Keanu Reeves) are young men making a living as street hustlers. Mike has narcolepsy and is looking for love and shelter. He travels with Scott on a journey shaped by loneliness and desire between men. Gus Van Sant’s drama moves between life on the streets, surreal passages and dialogue that draws on Shakespeare, mixing the pair’s wandering with documentary inserts. William Richert plays Bob Pigeon, with James Russo as Richard Waters and Udo Kier as Hans.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Gus Van Sant’s restless road drama is worth the uneven stretches for River Phoenix, who makes Mike’s loneliness hurt. The Shakespearean passages can feel laboured, but the tenderness survives them.

Gus Van Sant’s My Own Private Idaho is a moving, adventurous road drama, with a performance by River Phoenix that makes its awkward stretches worth forgiving. It follows young street hustlers without insisting that they explain themselves or become examples of what happens when a life goes wrong. Van Sant allows loneliness, sexual desire and human comedy to sit alongside one another, then complicates matters with surreal imagery and Shakespearean dialogue. There are passages when we wish he would leave the complications alone and stay with the people.

Phoenix plays Mike Waters, whose narcolepsy makes the ordinary business of getting through a day uncertain. He gives Mike a need for affection that can be painful to watch, but never plays him as someone waiting to be rescued by our sympathy. We felt protective of him: Phoenix makes Mike’s longing for love so exposed that even the lighter scenes cannot quite ease our worry. The delicacy matters because a performance with more obvious pleading would have made the character seem much simpler.

Keanu Reeves, as Scott Favor, is a useful presence beside him, less open and harder to read. The difference between them makes their companionship interesting without requiring a conventional plot to keep it moving. Reeves is less persuasive when Van Sant’s script leans into Shakespeare, where the formal language can sound like a difficult exercise. The theatricality has a purpose, giving these young men more than the usual vocabulary of street drama, but that does not make every line convincing.

John J. Campbell and Eric Alan Edwards’s cinematography gives the wandering a strange, dreamlike beauty, well suited to Mike’s interrupted waking life. Their images help us accept the surreal passages as part of his experience, and make the shifts in mood feel natural. David Brisbin’s production design gives the street scenes a convincing sense of everyday use. The surroundings provide a useful steadiness when Van Sant’s dialogue grows theatrical, keeping some connection to the lives the film is describing.

Curtiss Clayton’s editing has the difficult job of accommodating documentary inserts as well as the dreamier material, and the joins are sometimes conspicuous. We do not mind being made aware of a change in style; we mind when it interrupts an interest in the characters that has taken time to establish. Bill Stafford’s music is gentler company, allowing tenderness without making every scene an occasion for sorrow. The quieter stretches suit Phoenix particularly well, since he needs little assistance to hold our attention.

The film is particularly good on desire between men, allowing it to be awkward without making it shameful. Van Sant’s sympathy is evident, and Phoenix makes Mike’s need for affection feel too particular to serve as a lesson about anybody else’s life. The humour matters: it gives these men something to do beyond enduring hardship, and gives us a reason to enjoy being with them. Choose it for Phoenix, and be prepared to forgive a little declaiming along the way.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

68
Positive
5
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to My Own Private Idaho, with praise clustering around River Phoenix’s vulnerable, convincing performance and Van Sant’s visual imagination. Even less persuaded reviews find Phoenix compelling as Mike, a narcoleptic young hustler seeking affection and shelter. Supporters value the tenderness towards the characters, the attention to loneliness and the freedom from conventional plotting. Several also find humour in the film’s drifting encounters and abrupt changes of tone.

The spread is wide, with the film’s formal experiments producing the sharpest disagreements. Time Out sees its mixture of surreal imagery, documentary inserts and Shakespearean echoes as holding together despite the abundance of ideas. Empire finds the script awkward and the Shakespearean detour ill-advised. The New Yorker admires the ambition but finds the result schematic and short on emotional complexity, making clear that Phoenix’s performance commands broader agreement than the film around him.

RogerEbert.com
18 October 1991 · Roger Ebert
80*

The film evocatively captures the drifting need and human comedy in the lives of two young hustlers, one narcoleptic and seeking love or shelter. It succeeds as a story about particular young men without contrived plot mechanics or Hollywood conclusions.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
18 October 1991 · Kenneth Turan
75*

The idiosyncratic film confounds expectations with its puckish tone and use of narcolepsy as a plot device while delivering tender moments about loss and loneliness through Phoenix's delicate performance. Van Sant's quirky sensibility holds the elements together despite occasional self-indulgence.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
30 September 1991 · Terrence Rafferty
50*

Van Sant takes ambitious chances in this visually imaginative but ultimately schematic film that lacks the emotional complexity of his earlier work and feels surprisingly humorless. River Phoenix gives a superb performance as the narcoleptic Mike despite the film's flaws.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Phil Thomas
40*

The film is a major disappointment overall despite Van Sant's visual flair. The critic singles out River Phoenix's convincing performance as the standout element amid an awkward script and ill-advised Shakespearean detour.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
27 September 1991 · festival review · Vincent Canby

Van Sant makes a bold leap with this invigorating road movie about two male hustlers, written and acted with enormous insight and comic elan. It joins the front ranks of innovative independent American filmmaking.

Read the full review →
Time Out
31 May 2022 · WH

Van Sant's third feature packs in enough ideas for three films without falling apart. It is a road movie centered on narcoleptic hustler Mike, whose journey with Scott blends surreal beauty, documentary inserts, Shakespearean echoes and remarkable emotional openness.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is My Own Private Idaho worth watching?
My Own Private Idaho is worth watching for anyone who can accept a road drama that wanders rather than plots, and we scored it 82. River Phoenix makes Mike's loneliness hurt, and his performance carries the film through its uneven stretches. The Shakespearean passages can feel laboured, so come for the people rather than the experiment.
How long is My Own Private Idaho, and what is it rated?
My Own Private Idaho runs 1h 44m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a drama film.
Where can I watch My Own Private Idaho in the US?
My Own Private Idaho is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is My Own Private Idaho, and is it suitable for children?
My Own Private Idaho carries a UK 15 certificate and is not suitable for children. It is a drama about young street hustlers, so its adult content lies in sexual desire, drug use and hard lives rather than in violence or scares; our review found it awkward and tender rather than frightening. Older teenagers and adults are its natural audience.
How does My Own Private Idaho compare to Midnight Cowboy?
My Own Private Idaho is the dreamier and more adventurous of the two, while Midnight Cowboy is the sourer and more grounded. Both build a bruised friendship between hustlers, but Van Sant adds surreal passages and Shakespearean dialogue that do not always convince, where Schlesinger stays with his city and his two men. Choose Van Sant for Phoenix's tenderness, Schlesinger for the harder, plainer film.
What should I watch after My Own Private Idaho?
After My Own Private Idaho, try Midnight Cowboy (1969, Fi1m 85): Another bruised friendship among hustlers, with affection emerging through the daily humiliations. Then Vagabond (1985, Fi1m 90): For another wandering outsider, observed with patience and without the comfort of reassurance; and Happy Together (1997, Fi1m 86): Desire between men, restless travel and the difficulty of keeping each other company.

Cast

Awards

Independent Spirit Awards, 1992

Nominated
Best Cinematography
Nominated
Best Director
Won
Best Male Lead
Won
Best Screenplay

National Society of Film Critics Award for Best Actor, 1991

Won
National Society of Film Critics Award for Best Actor

Venice Film Festival, 1991

Nominated
Golden Lion

Volpi Cup, 1991

Won
Volpi Cup

If you liked this, try…

  1. Midnight Cowboy (1969, Fi1m 85)Another bruised friendship among hustlers, with affection emerging through the daily humiliations.

  2. Vagabond (1985, Fi1m 90)For another wandering outsider, observed with patience and without the comfort of reassurance.

  3. Happy Together (1997, Fi1m 86)Desire between men, restless travel and the difficulty of keeping each other company.

  4. My Beautiful Laundrette (1985, Fi1m 85)A sharper comic treatment of desire between men and the complications of class.

  5. Lean on Pete (2017) · not reviewed yetA young traveller’s need for kindness, handled without making his hardship look attractive.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever