Preacher Harry Powell (Robert Mitchum) holding a knife over Willa Harper (Shelley Winters) in bed
Film review

The Night of the Hunter

1955 · Directed by Charles Laughton · 1h 33m

In a sentenceA preacher with LOVE and HATE on his knuckles, and the whole town cannot wait to shake his hand

West Virginia, the Depression. Ben Harper (Peter Graves) robs a bank, kills two men and gets home with ten thousand dollars minutes ahead of the police. He hides the money and makes his children, John (Billy Chapin) and little Pearl (Sally Jane Bruce), swear never to tell where it is, not even to their mother. In prison he shares a cell with Harry Powell (Robert Mitchum), a self-appointed preacher with LOVE tattooed on one hand and HATE on the other, who listens to Ben talk in his sleep. Ben is hanged. Powell comes to Cresap’s Landing in a clean black suit, charms the widow Willa (Shelley Winters) and the shopkeeper Icey Spoon (Evelyn Varden), and sets about finding the money. Only John does not believe a word of it.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Charles Laughton’s only film as director is one of the strangest and best films fifties Hollywood made: a Depression fairy tale in black and white, with Robert Mitchum as a preacher we are still afraid of. The comedy is broad and the ending soft; neither matters.

Charles Laughton directed one film and this is it. He was an actor, and it shows in how much he asks of the people in front of the camera and how little he seems to care what a director of 1955 was supposed to do. The Night of the Hunter is taken from Davis Grubb’s novel, adapted by James Agee and Laughton, and it is a fairy tale in the old sense: a wicked man in a black hat, two children with a secret, a river, and an old woman who does not scare. We think it is among the best films Hollywood made in that decade, and we would send a stranger to see it.

Robert Mitchum plays Harry Powell, who calls himself a preacher and has LOVE tattooed across the fingers of one hand and HATE across the other. Early on he puts the two fists together and wrestles them for the benefit of a small town, and the small town applauds. Mitchum does not hurry, does not raise his voice until he needs to, and sings a hymn, Leaning on the Everlasting Arms, in a warm baritone that turns the words sour. We were frightened of him, properly, in a way that seventy years of imitation have not blunted. What frightened us most was not the knife in his pocket but how quickly everyone around him hands over their trust.

Stanley Cortez shot it in black and white with almost nothing in between. Powell’s shadow falls across a child’s bedroom wall before he does. Willa’s bedroom is lit so that the sloping ceiling becomes the roof of a chapel and the bed an altar, and we knew from the light alone that this marriage would not be one. The town is a painted set under a painted sky and Laughton does not hide it; he wants it to look like the pictures in a storybook, because that is how a child would remember it. When the children take to the river in the second half, Cortez puts a frog, a spider’s web or an owl in the foreground, large as the boat, and the journey plays as something dreamed.

Walter Schumann’s score does a good deal of the storytelling. Powell’s hymn is his calling card, heard before he is seen, and the river gets a lullaby that Schumann hands to a child’s voice over the water. Robert Golden cuts between the children in the boat and the man on the bank so that we always know how far behind he is. Nobody involved seems to have asked whether an audience of 1955 would accept any of this. Most of them did not, and the film failed. It opened in Britain on 24 November 1955 and took decades to find the reputation it has now.

Shelley Winters plays Willa Harper, the widow Powell marries for the money her husband hid, and she does something brave with a small part: she lets Willa want to be punished. Lillian Gish opens the film, telling a Bible story to a ring of children against a sky full of stars, and returns late as Rachel Cooper, an old woman with no patience for a man in a good suit. Gish had been the face of silent cinema, and Laughton uses her as one, all eyes and set jaw. Billy Chapin, as John, carries the middle of the film on a face that has learned too early to give nothing away.

It is not without faults, and they are easy to name. Evelyn Varden and Don Beddoe, as the gossiping Spoons, play their scenes as farce, and the film lurches every time it visits their shop. Sally Jane Bruce, as Pearl, is a small child asked to hit marks, and sometimes she simply hits them. The last few minutes turn soft and start to tell us what we have been watching, which we had worked out. The New Yorker in 1955 found it arty, and we can see the scenes it meant. The reviews since have mostly been raves, and on this one we are with them.

At 93 minutes it wastes nothing, and the 12 certificate is fair: children watching will be frightened, which is the point, and there is nothing on screen they cannot be told about afterwards. Watch it with the lights off and the volume up for the hymn. We were humming it for a week afterwards, and we did not enjoy that.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

86
Positive
17
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics agree, and the agreement runs deep. Nearly every review treats Charles Laughton’s only film as a director as a singular piece of American cinema, and the praise clusters in two places: Robert Mitchum’s preacher, described again and again as charming and chilling in the same breath, and Stanley Cortez’s black-and-white photography, with its hard shadows, silhouettes and, above all, the river sequence, which several reviews pick out as the passage that makes the film dreamlike rather than merely grim. Lillian Gish’s counterweight to Mitchum gets a quieter round of approval.

The reservations are few and mostly old. The one negative review, The New Yorker in 1955, finds the film uneven and heavy with allegory, while admiring the performances. The New York Times, the same week, thinks the story softens at the end. Sight and Sound is the only recent voice with a caveat, noting moments of broad comedy that hold it just short of the front rank. Otherwise the spread is narrow.

Little White Lies
16 January 2014 · 5/5/4 · Mark Asch
100

The critic calls it a welcome revival and one of classic cinema’s great uncategorisable outliers that returns triumphantly to the big screen. They single out its unique mix of Christian parable, folk tale and social concerns, along with the striking Carpenter Gothic visuals by Stanley Cortez and Lillian Gish’s performance.

Read the full review →
Time Out
14 January 2014 · ★★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
100

The review hails the film as cutting a clear line between innocence and depravity in Charles Laughton’s sole directorial effort. It singles out Robert Mitchum’s performance as the heart of absolute darkness and the masterful black-and-white contrasts that make it the most haunted and dreamlike of American films.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
1 December 2010 · A · Scott Tobias
95

The critic deems it the greatest directorial one-off in cinema history, praising its elemental power rooted in American conflicts of sin, violence, and good versus evil. Mitchum's dark charisma and Cortez's shadows create terror, while the river sequence offers poetic allure.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2011 · Adam Smith
90*

The critic deems it one of the finest movies ever made, lauding Mitchum's magnetic performance as the preacher villain and the film's innovative direction and lyrical river sequence.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
14 November 2010 · Dennis Lim
90*

The review presents the film as a timeless masterpiece blending Expressionism, folk tale, and parable, noting its initial mixed reception and later acclaim. It singles out the child's-eye view and the contrast between Mitchum's villain and Gish's benevolence for praise.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
24 November 1996 · Roger Ebert
90*

The critic calls it one of the greatest American films, praising its expressionistic style, timeless quality, and unforgettable villain. He highlights the visual fantasy and Mitchum's iconic performance as elements that make it enduring despite its initial failure.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Night of the Hunter worth watching?
The Night of the Hunter is worth watching for almost anyone, and we scored it 91: a Depression fairy tale in black and white with Robert Mitchum as a preacher we are still afraid of. The comedy around the gossiping Spoons is broad and the last few minutes turn soft, but at 93 minutes it wastes nothing.
How long is The Night of the Hunter, and what is it rated?
The Night of the Hunter runs 1h 33m. It is a crime and drama film.
Where can I watch The Night of the Hunter in the US?
The Night of the Hunter is streaming on The Criterion Channel, Tubi, The Roku Channel and Amazon Prime Video in the US. It leaves Tubi on 1 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The Night of the Hunter, and is it suitable for children?
The Night of the Hunter carries a UK 12 certificate, and we think that is fair: it is frightening rather than graphic, with almost nothing shown that a child cannot be told about afterwards. Mitchum's preacher scares by his calm and his hymn, not by gore, so younger children may find him hard to shake, while teenagers should be fine.
How does The Night of the Hunter compare to The Spirit of the Beehive?
The Night of the Hunter is the more frightening and the more direct of the two, a storybook thriller with a villain at its centre, where The Spirit of the Beehive is quiet, slow and told mostly in silence and firelight. Both see a haunted world through a child's eyes; we rate Laughton's film the higher, but Erice's rewards the patience it asks for.
Is The Night of the Hunter based on a true story or a book?
The Night of the Hunter is based on Davis Grubb's novel, adapted for the screen by James Agee and Charles Laughton; it is not a true story. The film plays it as a fairy tale in the old sense, a wicked man in a black hat and two children with a secret, and you need not know the book to follow or enjoy it.
What should I watch after The Night of the Hunter?
After The Night of the Hunter, try Cape Fear (1962, Fi1m 82): Mitchum menaces another family, this time in daylight, and is no less patient about it. Then The Spirit of the Beehive (1973, Fi1m 87): A Spanish child’s-eye view of a haunted countryside, told mostly in silence and firelight.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Cape Fear (1962, Fi1m 82)Mitchum menaces another family, this time in daylight, and is no less patient about it.

  2. Whistle Down the Wind (1961) · not reviewed yetLancashire children mistake a fugitive for someone holier; the gentler English cousin of Laughton’s film.

  3. The Spirit of the Beehive (1973, Fi1m 87)A Spanish child’s-eye view of a haunted countryside, told mostly in silence and firelight.

  4. Nightmare Alley (1947) · not reviewed yetA carnival con man learns to preach; the same American faith in a good voice.

  5. The Reflecting Skin (1990) · not reviewed yetPrairie Gothic through a boy’s eyes, with wheat fields shot like painted backdrops and real dread.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever