Danny Ocean (George Clooney), Rusty Ryan (Brad Pitt) and Linus Caldwell (Matt Damon) seated in an airport terminal
Film review

Ocean's Thirteen

2007 · Directed by Steven Soderbergh · 2h 02m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceA dozen men in good suits avenge a heart attack by fixing the roulette; Al Pacino has been tanned to match the carpet

Willy Bank (Al Pacino), a Las Vegas hotel man with a taste for awards, cuts an old partner out of a casino deal, and the partner ends up in a hospital bed. Danny Ocean (George Clooney) and Rusty Ryan (Brad Pitt) reassemble the crew, including Linus Caldwell (Matt Damon), Basher Tarr (Don Cheadle), Frank Catton (Bernie Mac) and Saul Bloom (Carl Reiner), with a plan: attend the opening night of Bank’s new casino and make sure the house loses on every table. To pay for it they go to their old enemy Terry Benedict (Andy Garcia), who has his own reasons to dislike Bank. Ellen Barkin plays Abigail Sponder, Bank’s second in command. Steven Soderbergh directs and shoots.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Soderbergh’s third heist is the most relaxed of the three and the emptiest: handsome, quick, funny in patches, and played by men who have stopped pretending to be characters. It passes two hours pleasantly and does not survive a second thought.

Six years after Ocean’s Eleven, Steven Soderbergh takes the crew back to Las Vegas. Willy Bank (Al Pacino), a hotel man with a deep tan and a shelf of awards, cuts one of the old gang out of a casino partnership, and the old man ends up in a hospital bed. Danny Ocean (George Clooney) and Rusty Ryan (Brad Pitt) decide the answer is to attend Bank’s opening night and make sure his casino loses: rig every table on the floor, and see that the critic who hands out the awards Bank collects has the worst stay of his life. That is the whole story, and it is told in the first quarter of an hour. The remaining 107 minutes are the doing of it.

It is the most relaxed of the three films and the thinnest, and we enjoyed it a good deal more than we can defend. Nobody in it wants anything except to win, nobody is in danger for longer than a scene, and the one woman with lines exists to be tricked. It is also handsome, quick and often funny, and for two hours on a sofa that turns out to be nearly enough.

Soderbergh shoots it himself, and the colour is the film’s real character. The casino floor is hot amber and gold, the exteriors a sour green, the faces lit as if through the bottom of a whisky glass. Philip Messina’s hotel is a gold tower with a purple-and-brass floor, and the sheer size of the place makes the plan look plausible: you believe there is room in it for a dozen men to be doing something wrong at once. Stephen Mirrione cuts the heist in split screens, three columns running in parallel, which keeps twenty moving parts legible while the dialogue declines to explain any of them. David Holmes writes organ, brass and loping bass, and none of it ever hurries.

The writing, by Brian Koppelman and David Levien, has stopped bothering with character. Clooney and Pitt finish each other’s sentences and eat in every scene, and they are hosting rather than acting; it is pleasant, and there is nothing under it. Matt Damon’s Linus still wants to be taken seriously and is given a false nose for his trouble. Carl Reiner’s Saul, posing as the hotel critic, is the best thing in the ensemble, a small old man complaining about his room with the grievance of a lifetime. Casey Affleck and Scott Caan, as the Malloy brothers, are sent off on an errand of their own, and every cut back to it felt like a wrong turn. Pacino is fine. He whispers, he glows, he says the same line about his awards, and he is given nothing to do but lose.

Ellen Barkin, as Bank’s right hand Abigail Sponder, is the only woman with a part, and her part is to be made a fool of. Barkin plays it broad and gets the laughs. We laughed, and were not proud of it, because the joke is on her and never on the men. The first film had Julia Roberts and a marriage to win back. This one has this.

Here is what got us. There is a short scene, in a hotel room, with Danny and Rusty and a television, that we will not describe. It is the funniest thing in the film and the only honest one, because it is the one time either man admits to feeling anything, and it took us by surprise. Then it goes back to the tables, and somewhere in the second hour we realised we did not mind whether the plan worked, because nothing on screen had suggested it might not.

Ocean’s Eleven (2001) had a casino to beat and a wife to win. Ocean’s Twelve (2004) was a holiday the cast took without us. Ocean’s Thirteen returns to the floor with the stakes removed, and it runs 122 minutes and carries a PG, which is about right for a film in which the worst that can happen to anyone is losing at cards. Watch it at home, with a drink and someone who will not ask questions, and forgive it before it starts.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

55
Positive
5
Mixed
3
Negative
4

The reviews split almost down the middle, and the disagreement is about whether a return to Las Vegas is a relief or a retreat. Those in favour find the third film breezier and better plotted than its predecessor, and they praise Soderbergh’s polished direction, the glossy camerawork, the intricacy of the cons and the ensemble’s relaxed cool, with Clooney and Pacino picked out by name.

The reservations cluster on familiarity: several critics say it plays as a remake of the first film, with thinner characters, a wafer-thin role for Pacino and a fondness for its own stars that curdles into smugness. The negative end is sharp. The Guardian calls it empty and self-congratulatory and objects to the treatment of its one female character, while Slant Magazine finds the vignettes disconnected and the factory strike subplot offensive. Radio Times thinks the cast looks disengaged, Ellen Barkin apart. The spread runs the full width of the scale.

Variety
8 June 2007 · Todd McCarthy
85*

The film recaptures the breezy cool of the first entry by returning to Vegas, with stylish direction, strong production values, and an ideal Pacino as the nemesis. It delivers ultra-cool cons and keeps the series' fizz alive without missing a beat.

Read the full review →
Empire
4 January 2006 · Chris Hewitt
80*

The critic finds Ocean’s Thirteen a welcome return to form after the more experimental Twelve, with a breezy and entertaining second half full of clever twists and strong ensemble moments. They single out the glossy style, technical camerawork and Clooney’s charismatic lead performance for particular praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
7 June 2007
80*

The third installment is lighter than air and a well-oiled machine, with Soderbergh working at his best in this Vegas romp. The critic praises the glamorous style, fast-moving screenplay, and the way the film pushes conventional narrative while delivering pure entertainment.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
24 May 2007 · festival review
70*

The critic finds that the film recaptures much of the spirit of the original Ocean's Eleven despite lacking its freshness, crediting the clever script centered on friendship and revenge while noting some subplots misfire and Pacino's role is wafer-thin.

Read the full review →
Time Out
5 June 2007 · ★★★ · David Jenkins
60

The critic finds it a breezy but familiar third entry that improves thematically on predecessors by focusing on aging criminals, though it feels like a remake of the first film.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
8 June 2007 · Kenneth Turan
50*

Better than the unfocused 'Ocean's Twelve' but a pale copy of the original 'Ocean's Eleven,' lacking its brio and inspiration. The critic finds the self-mythologizing smugness and repetitive character tics tiresome, though it remains serviceable as a straight-ahead heist.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Ocean's Thirteen worth watching?
Ocean's Thirteen is worth an undemanding evening for anyone who liked the first film's company, and we scored it 63. It is handsome, quick and funny in patches, with Soderbergh's amber-and-gold casino floor and Stephen Mirrione's split-screen heist doing most of the work. Nobody is ever in danger and nobody has a character; enjoy it with a drink and do not think about it afterwards.
How long is Ocean's Thirteen, and what is it rated?
Ocean's Thirteen runs 2h 02m and is rated PG-13 by the MPA in the US. It is a crime and thriller film.
Where can I watch Ocean's Thirteen in the US?
Ocean's Thirteen is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from $4.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Ocean's Thirteen, and is it suitable for children?
Ocean's Thirteen carries a UK PG and is not violent or frightening; the worst that happens to anyone is losing at cards. One old man ends up in a hospital bed after a heart attack, and that is the extent of the peril. It suits older children and teenagers who can follow a fast-talking plan, though younger ones may find two hours of men in suits rigging roulette hard to stay with.
How does Ocean's Thirteen compare to Ocean's Twelve?
Ocean's Thirteen is the more relaxed and the emptier of the two, and marginally the better evening, because it goes back to a casino floor and a plan that can be followed. Ocean's Twelve felt like a holiday the cast took without us; the third film at least turns up to work. Neither bothers with character, but the third is funnier and easier to forgive.
Do you need to have seen the other Ocean's films before Ocean's Thirteen?
Ocean's Thirteen can be watched without the earlier films; the story is told in the first quarter of an hour and the rest is the doing of it. You will miss why Terry Benedict is an old enemy and why the crew's banter carries a history, and the first film remains the better place to start. Nothing here depends on knowing what happened before.
What should I watch after Ocean's Thirteen?
After Ocean's Thirteen, try Ocean's Eleven (2001, Fi1m 80): The same crew when they still had something to want; the best of the three. Then The Sting (1973, Fi1m 85): Newman and Redford run a long con with the same ease and better jokes; and Bob le flambeur (1956, Fi1m 76): An ageing gambler plans one last casino job in Montmartre; melancholy where Soderbergh is glib.
What order should I watch the Ocean's films in?
Release order is the safe choice for Ocean's, and it is the order our collection page lists them in. Ocean's Thirteen is the most recent of the 3 Ocean's titles on Fi1m; before it comes Ocean's Twelve. The full order.

Part of · 3 of 3

Ocean's

3 films on Fi1m · 2001–2007 · average 67 · best Ocean's Eleven 80

All 3 in order

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Ocean's Eleven (2001, Fi1m 80)The same crew when they still had something to want; the best of the three.

  2. Rififi (1955) · not reviewed yetHalf an hour of near-silent safecracking; the film every heist since has copied.

  3. The Sting (1973, Fi1m 85)Newman and Redford run a long con with the same ease and better jokes.

  4. Bob le flambeur (1956, Fi1m 76)An ageing gambler plans one last casino job in Montmartre; melancholy where Soderbergh is glib.

  5. Logan Lucky (2017, Fi1m 76)Soderbergh’s heist again, with a race track and no tuxedos; looser and warmer.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever