Rick Dalton (Leonardo DiCaprio) and Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt) conversing at a restaurant table
Film review

Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood

2019 · Directed by Quentin Tarantino · 2h 42m · MPA R

In a sentenceBrad Pitt fixes an aerial with his shirt off and the film stops to watch; so, to be fair, did we

Los Angeles, 1969. Rick Dalton (Leonardo DiCaprio) was the star of a television Western and is now the villain of the week on other people’s shows, drinking too much and wondering whether it is over. Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt) is his stunt double, his driver and his only friend, living in a caravan behind a drive-in with his dog. Up the hill from Rick, the actress Sharon Tate (Margot Robbie) has just moved in with her husband, the director Roman Polanski. Over a few days in February, Rick tries to get through a job on a Western pilot, Cliff gives a lift to a hitchhiker (Margaret Qualley) who lives on a ranch with some friends, and Sharon goes to the cinema. Quentin Tarantino writes and directs.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Tarantino’s slowest and kindest film is a long afternoon in 1969 Los Angeles with two men whose time is running out. It is too long and it looks away from things it should not, but the company is good and the city is lovely.

Quentin Tarantino has made a film about two men who have been in the business a long time and can feel it ending. Rick Dalton (Leonardo DiCaprio) starred in a television Western and now gets hired to lose fights to younger men on television. Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt) was his stunt double and is now his driver. It is 1969, and up the hill from Rick’s house Sharon Tate (Margot Robbie) has moved in with her husband, the director Roman Polanski. If you know what happened that August, you will spend the film waiting.

This is a good film and a long one. At 162 minutes it dawdles, and for most of that time we were glad to be in the car. It is the warmest thing Tarantino has made and one of the least shaped, and two or three scenes are hard to defend. We recommend it, with those reservations.

Barbara Ling has rebuilt a stretch of Los Angeles that no longer exists. There is a shot at dusk where the neon along the boulevard comes on sign by sign as the cars pass beneath it. Robert Richardson shoots the streets from low and from moving cars, in gold and dusty light, so the city looks the way people who grew up there insist it did. Arianne Phillips keeps Cliff in the same jeans and Hawaiian shirt for a week, and it suits him. There is no composer. The songs come off the car radio, adverts and jingles left in, and the radio places the film in its year better than any caption could.

DiCaprio has never been better at being bad at something. Rick is a decent actor who knows he is not a great one, and the film’s middle follows him through a day on a Western pilot, opposite Timothy Olyphant’s Jim Stacy, fluffing his lines and then screaming at himself in his trailer. A child co-star (Julia Butters, as Trudi Fraser, more serious about the work than anyone there) sits beside him between takes and talks to him as a colleague, and later tells him something kind. We were moved more than we expected, and Butters did it: she says the line straight, with no sense that she is comforting him, and DiCaprio’s face does the rest.

Pitt has the easier part and knows it. Cliff wants nothing, feeds his dog, and fixes Rick’s aerial with his shirt off while the film stops to watch. Then he gives a lift to a girl called Pussycat (Margaret Qualley) and drives her out to the ranch where she lives, and the film changes temperature. Cliff insists on saying hello to the old man who owns the place (Bruce Dern, as George Spahn), and Dakota Fanning stands on the porch and tells him no. Fred Raskin cuts the walk to the house so slowly that we were frightened for a man we had not thought could be hurt. It is the best sequence in the film.

The problems are real. Robbie’s Sharon Tate is given almost nothing to say; she dances, drives, buys a book, and sits in a cinema watching an audience enjoy her. It is lovely, and it is all there is; a film this long could have found her a conversation. Mike Moh plays Bruce Lee as a braggart who exists to make Cliff look good, and we winced at a real man being used as a punchline. Cliff has a thing in his past that the film raises and then shrugs off as a joke, and wants us to shrug too. And there are twenty minutes in the middle that Raskin could have lost.

The last half hour is where the film has been heading, and we will not say what happens, except that it is loud, it earns its 18 certificate, and it left us laughing and uneasy at once. The film is pleased with itself about it; we were less sure. Against Tarantino’s own work it is gentler than Inglourious Basterds and The Hateful Eight, and closest in mood to Jackie Brown, which was better built.

Watch it on an evening with nothing after it. If you are checking the clock at the hour mark, it will not win you back.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

85
Positive
9
Mixed
3
Negative
0

Most critics like it, and a good number like it a great deal. The praise clusters around two things: Leonardo DiCaprio and Brad Pitt, whose easy chemistry as a fading television actor and his stunt double comes up in nearly every review, and the recreation of 1969 Los Angeles, from the production design down to the music choices. Many describe it as Tarantino’s most relaxed and mature film, a hangout picture rather than a plot, and several rank it alongside his strongest work.

The reservations are about length and shape. Even admirers call it baggy, indulgent and slow in patches, and a few feel the final third’s lurch into violence breaks the mood the rest of the film has built; The Playlist puts it in exactly those terms. The Guardian and The Ringer go further, faulting how the film treats its women and the Manson history it rewrites. The spread runs from lukewarm to rapturous, with no review outright negative.

Evening Standard
22 May 2019 · ★★★★★ · David Sexton
100

The film is a leisurely, enjoyable homage to old Hollywood with wonderful performances, amazing period detail and sensational violence in the finale, serving as an extraordinary career summation even if not a career best.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
30 July 2019 · ★★★★★ · Terry Staunton
100

Tarantino fires on all cylinders in this playful and daring Tinseltown tale that is arguably the most character-driven entry in his CV. The critic singles out the standout performances, especially DiCaprio as the declining star, and the visual splendour for praise.

Read the full review →
The Times
15 August 2019 · ★★★★★ · Kevin Maher
100

Quentin Tarantino has made his masterpiece, a monumental leap ahead of his recent work that is better than Pulp Fiction. It praises the sun-kissed evocation of 1969 Hollywood, meticulous production design and the film’s deeper themes around violence and cinematic dreams.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
18 August 2019 · Peter Bradshaw
60*

The director’s love letter to 1960s Hollywood, where all women are stereotypes and white men the real victims, disturbs and dazzles in equal measure. It praises the meticulous period details, music choices and cinematography while faulting the baggy structure, indulgences and provocative handling of certain themes.

Read the full review →
Empire
25 July 2019 · Ian Freer

The film is a likeable buddy movie with brilliant performances and gorgeous filmmaking that celebrates Tarantino's obsessions, but it lacks the zip and intensity of his best work and feels more mature and less showy.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
21 May 2019 · festival review

The critic calls the film funny, revisionist and unexpectedly warm-hearted, with terrific performances from Brad Pitt and Leonardo DiCaprio that give it wider appeal. It praises the beautiful craft and real affection for Los Angeles of the director's youth.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood worth watching?
Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood is worth watching for anyone with a free evening and a fondness for actors in good company, and we scored it 77. It is Tarantino's warmest film and one of his least shaped: 162 minutes that dawdle, with twenty minutes in the middle that could go. If you are checking the clock at the hour mark, it will not win you back.
How long is Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood, and what is it rated?
Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood runs 2h 42m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a comedy and drama film.
Where can I watch Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood in the US?
Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood is streaming on Hulu in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from $3.99. It leaves Hulu on 25 September. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood, and is it suitable for children?
Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood carries an 18 certificate in the UK and is not suitable for children. Most of it is gentle, an afternoon of driving and talking, but the last half hour is loud and violent enough to earn the rating, and a slow walk up to a ranch house frightened us more than we expected. Teenagers and the squeamish should know that the ending arrives hard.
How does Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood compare to The Long Goodbye?
Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood and The Long Goodbye both wander the same Los Angeles hills a few years apart, but Altman's is the tighter, sadder film and the one we would send a stranger to first. Tarantino's is longer, kinder and more pleased with itself, and it ends in noise where Altman's ends in a shrug. Choose Tarantino for the company and the city, Altman for a detective nobody listens to.
What should I watch after Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood?
After Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood, try The Long Goodbye (1973, Fi1m 86): Altman’s Marlowe wanders the same hills a few years later and nobody listens to him. Then Jackie Brown (1997, Fi1m 83): Tarantino’s other patient film, with better shape and a Pam Grier worth waiting for; and Hail, Caesar! (2016, Fi1m 72): The Coens’ studio comedy, shorter, sillier and just as fond of the old machinery.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2020

Nominated
Best Picture
Won
Best Production Design
Won
Best Supporting Actor

If you liked this, try…

  1. Shampoo (1975) · not reviewed yetWarren Beatty’s Los Angeles on the eve of 1968, sadder and randier than this.

  2. The Long Goodbye (1973, Fi1m 86)Altman’s Marlowe wanders the same hills a few years later and nobody listens to him.

  3. Jackie Brown (1997, Fi1m 83)Tarantino’s other patient film, with better shape and a Pam Grier worth waiting for.

  4. Day for Night (1973) · not reviewed yetTruffaut on a film set, where the work is the point and everyone is tired.

  5. Hail, Caesar! (2016, Fi1m 72)The Coens’ studio comedy, shorter, sillier and just as fond of the old machinery.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever