Linguini (Lou Romano) serves a plate to Colette (Janeane Garofalo) as Remy watches
Film review

Ratatouille

2007 · Directed by Brad Bird · 1h 51m · MPA G

In a sentenceA rat has made us hungry, and we would rather not explain that to the restaurant inspector

Remy (voiced by Patton Oswalt) is a rat with ambitions to become a chef in Paris. Cooking means entering a human world that has little reason to welcome him, however much he cares about food. His pursuit brings him into the company of Linguini (Lou Romano) and Colette (Janeane Garofalo), with food critic Anton Ego (Peter O’Toole) among those whose judgement matters. Brad Bird’s animated comedy follows a would-be cook trying to find a place in a kitchen, where talent and hard work may not be enough to overcome what others see when they look at him.

Fi1m review

Brad Bird makes a rat’s wish to cook worth taking seriously, with precise animation and characters who care about doing something well. Ratatouille runs a little long, but we recommend it without hesitation.

Ratatouille is an excellent comedy about the pleasure of being good at something, and the work that comes before the pleasure. Brad Bird, who writes and directs, takes Remy’s wish to become a chef seriously enough that we do too. The rat is an outsider for reasons no amount of practice can remove. That gives a familiar follow-your-dreams story a difficulty worth thinking about: skill does not guarantee that anybody will give someone a chance. Bird keeps the cooking interesting enough to make the question matter.

Robert Anderson and Sharon Calahan’s cinematography makes Paris inviting without losing the rat’s small scale. Looking at the city from his height gives the setting a practical purpose: we have to imagine moving through it in that body. Harley Jessup’s production design is equally useful in the kitchen, where the arrangement of the working space helps us follow the action. The detail tells us how the place functions. It is pleasurable to look at, but it also lets the comedy move without constant explanation.

We were surprised by how hungry the cooking made us. The animation gives the food enough substance to suggest taste, and the care taken over its preparation makes us want to try it. Patton Oswalt’s voice helps: his Remy sounds absorbed in what he wants to make, and that concentration makes him easy to care about. Bird allows the business of preparing food to hold our attention. For a family comedy, it is an unusually persuasive reason to stop waiting for the next joke.

Darren T. Holmes’s editing gives the physical comedy a clear sequence of actions and consequences. That matters when an animated film can send bodies anywhere it likes; here, movement usually has a purpose beyond filling the screen. Michael Giacchino’s score keeps the mood playful without making the characters’ efforts seem trivial. The film can be busy without feeling frantic.

Peter O’Toole’s Anton Ego gives the prospect of a critic’s judgement a severity that is funny and faintly alarming. His voice makes us understand why anyone cooking for this man would care about getting it right. Oswalt and O’Toole are especially well matched: Remy’s eagerness and Ego’s exacting manner suggest different ways of caring deeply about food. Bird finds enough comedy in that difference without making either interest seem foolish.

The reservation is length, and it is worth making even for a film this good. The film runs 111 minutes, and Bird’s screenplay occasionally spends longer talking through its concerns than the comedy needs. The kitchen scenes have already shown us why Remy cares; further persuasion can feel unnecessary. Younger viewers may grow restless when the conversation takes over. We did not need more jokes everywhere, but a firmer cut would have helped the quieter passages keep their momentum.

There is less dependence here on rapid jokes than we expect from family animation, and more confidence that children can enjoy watching someone learn a skill. That confidence is mostly justified, even if the talkier passages test it. We would recommend Ratatouille to people who tend to avoid animation as readily as to those who love it. Watch it before dinner, while there is still time to change what is on the menu.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

85
Positive
12
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics greet Ratatouille with enthusiasm, praising the animation’s detail, colour and movement, particularly in its Parisian streets and busy kitchens. The depiction of food draws repeated admiration for suggesting taste and smell through images alone. The reviews also value Brad Bird’s storytelling, its warmth towards an outsider and its belief in artistic ambition. Peter O’Toole’s performance as food critic Anton Ego stands out among the voice work, while several critics find emotional substance in the film’s treatment of cooking and creativity.

Reservations mostly concern length, occasional dull stretches and comedy that could be sharper. The spread is wide, though dissent is scarce: Eye for Film finds the dream-chasing story familiar and the talky approach potentially less appealing to children. The Skinny is more dismissive, admiring the visuals but finding the plot muddy and the characters less memorable than Pixar’s earlier creations. Even these dissenters acknowledge its visual accomplishment.

The Guardian
12 October 2007 · ★★★★★ · Xan Brooks
100

The critic loved the film for its masterful animation technique with a richer palette and its heartfelt parable of illegitimacy and the outsider.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
12 October 2007 · ★★★★★ · Sukhdev Sandhu
100

The critic calls it a wonderful film and Brad Bird's most daring and brilliant creation, singling out a moving scene about food, memory and identity.

Read the full review →
The Times
11 October 2007 · ★★★★★ · James Christopher
100

The critic hails the film as marvellous and an extraordinary demonstration of animation evoking taste and smell, praising the rat's-eye view of Paris and Peter O'Toole's voice performance.

Read the full review →
Time Out
8 October 2007 · ★★★★★ · Wally Hammond
100

The critic calls it one of the most witty, clever, gently moral and visually stimulating family entertainments of the year. They single out the extraordinary and occasionally breathtaking animation along with vivid characters such as the food critic Anton Ego.

Read the full review →
Empire
28 September 2007 · Ian Nathan
95*

The critic calls it Pixar’s masterpiece, praising its rich storytelling, inventive animation, and emotional depth as a rat dreams of becoming a chef in Paris. Brad Bird is highlighted for his auteur-like direction and the film’s joyful, life-affirming qualities.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
20 June 2007 · festival review
90*

The critic declares it hard to imagine any other film coming close in this or any year, praising its rich, complicated, intelligent storytelling and unprecedented animation style and movement. They single out the sophisticated blend of human and animal characters, warm characterizations and wealth of detail.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Ratatouille worth watching?
Ratatouille is worth watching, and we scored it 91. Brad Bird takes a rat's wish to cook seriously, and the animation makes the food convincing enough that we left hungry. It runs a little long, and younger viewers may fidget when the talk takes over, but we would recommend it to people who avoid animation as readily as to those who love it.
How long is Ratatouille, and what is it rated?
Ratatouille runs 1h 51m and is rated G by the MPA in the US. It is an animation and comedy film.
Where can I watch Ratatouille in the US?
Ratatouille is streaming on Hulu and Disney+ in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from $3.99. It leaves Hulu on 1 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Ratatouille compare to Kiki's Delivery Service?
Ratatouille and Kiki's Delivery Service are both about a young worker learning whether talent is enough to hold down a job. Bird's film is the busier and funnier of the two, with kitchen comedy and a persuasive interest in cooking; Miyazaki's is quieter and gentler, better on the courage an ordinary working day demands. We rate both highly, and would send restless children to Ratatouille first.
What should I watch after Ratatouille?
After Ratatouille, try Babette's Feast (1987, Fi1m 86): Patient, generous attention to cooking and the people gathered to eat. Then Kiki's Delivery Service (1989, Fi1m 86): Another young worker learning how talent survives the demands of a job; and The Lunchbox (2013, Fi1m 75): Food gives two lonely people a reason to pay attention again.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2008

Nominated
Best Original Score
Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Sound Editing
Nominated
Best Writing, Original Screenplay
Won
Best Animated Feature

BAFTA Film Awards, 2008

Nominated
BAFTA's Children & Young People Award - Feature Film

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Animated Movie, 2008

Won
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Animated Movie

Annie Award for Best Animated Feature, 2007

Won
Annie Award for Best Animated Feature

Critics' Choice Awards, 2007

Won
Best Animated Feature

If you liked this, try…

  1. Babette's Feast (1987, Fi1m 86)Patient, generous attention to cooking and the people gathered to eat.

  2. Kiki's Delivery Service (1989, Fi1m 86)Another young worker learning how talent survives the demands of a job.

  3. The Lunchbox (2013, Fi1m 75)Food gives two lonely people a reason to pay attention again.

  4. Ernest & Celestine (2012, Fi1m 84)A warmer, quieter case for giving an unlikely outsider a chance.

  5. The Iron Giant (1999, Fi1m 88)Brad Bird gives another improbable outsider room to become someone worth loving.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever