Don Lockwood (Gene Kelly) and Kathy Selden (Debbie Reynolds) under a red umbrella
Film review

Singin' in the Rain

1952 · Directed by Stanley Donen, Gene Kelly · 1h 43m · MPA G

In a sentenceWe could happily watch Jean Hagen argue with recording equipment for another hour

Hollywood is learning to make films with sound, and Don Lockwood (Gene Kelly) is caught in the change. Around him are Cosmo Brown (Donald O’Connor), Kathy Selden (Debbie Reynolds) and Lina Lamont (Jean Hagen), as performers and film-makers discover how much a microphone can complicate their work. Studio routines become material for comedy, romance and song-and-dance numbers, with elocution lessons and recording troubles among the obstacles. Stanley Donen and Kelly direct a musical set amid the picture business of the late 1920s, where being able to command the screen no longer means being able to stay silent.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Stanley Donen and Gene Kelly’s musical makes the arrival of sound in Hollywood funny, troublesome and a reason to dance. The romance is slight, but the comic timing and pleasure of the performances make this an easy recommendation.

Singin’ in the Rain is generous entertainment with a useful comic suspicion of the people who make it. Directors Stanley Donen and Gene Kelly turn Hollywood’s move to sound into a succession of practical difficulties, giving talented people equipment that does not care how famous they are. We recommend it without requiring any fondness for old Hollywood: the jokes make sense the moment somebody has to work with the new machinery. Betty Comden and Adolph Green’s screenplay gives the singing and dancing room while keeping the business of making a film in view.

Jean Hagen, as Lina Lamont, is the chief reason the comedy stays so sharp. We laughed aloud at Lina’s trouble with the microphone. Hagen gives her indignation such conviction that we can enjoy the absurdity without dismissing the performer. She makes the difficulties of recording a voice funny through timing and temperament, and the scene has no need of a song to keep it moving.

Kelly’s Don Lockwood gives the film its assurance, and Cosmo Brown supplies a welcome unruliness. Kelly never seems to be counting steps, while O’Connor lets us feel the effort of a physical joke. Debbie Reynolds, as Kathy Selden, holds her place alongside them without seeming like an accessory to their act. The romance is thinly written, though Reynolds gives Kathy enough presence to keep it from feeling like a pause between routines.

Harold Rosson’s photography gives the dancers space, allowing us to follow their movements clearly. Adrienne Fazan’s editing preserves that pleasure while allowing the comic performances their pauses, particularly when Hagen has something to object to. The production design makes the studio surroundings enjoyable to look at without stealing attention from the people at work in them. Walter Plunkett’s costumes contribute to the bright colour and keep the period visible even when the dancing takes over.

Cosmo Brown’s music has the directness this kind of comedy needs: tunes that make an immediate impression and still leave room for a performer to play. The title number is a good measure of the film’s confidence, trusting Kelly’s dancing in the rain to hold our attention. It made us happier than we expected; his pleasure in moving is so clear that the sequence does not need a further joke to justify itself.

The film is less curious about anyone who might be left behind by the change to sound. Comden and Green find plenty of comedy in professional panic, but their sympathy has limits when somebody cannot adapt. That keeps things light, though it also makes the studio business seem kinder than some of the jokes suggest. The attention stays chiefly with people who can keep entertaining us, leaving the less fortunate outside the picture.

At 103 minutes, it gives its performers time without making us impatient for the story to resume. It passes the musical’s basic test of making another song welcome, even when the comedy would be enough to keep us watching. If musicals usually test your patience, we would try this one before giving up on them.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

91
Positive
19
Mixed
0
Negative
0

Nineteen reviews, every one of them positive, and the praise barely wavers across seven decades. Most critics treat it as the Hollywood musical the others are measured against. The satire of the studios’ scramble into sound is singled out as clever and affectionate rather than sour, and the songs are noted for sitting inside the story rather than interrupting it. Gene Kelly’s dancing draws the warmest notices, the title number above all, with Donald O’Connor’s Make ‘Em Laugh close behind. Jean Hagen’s comic turn is mentioned repeatedly, and Kelly and Donen’s direction is credited with making hard work look easy.

Reservations are scarce. The New Yorker is the coolest voice, admiring O’Connor’s vaudeville skills and Kelly’s tap work without the rapture found elsewhere. Little White Lies observes that the film’s cheer glosses over the industry’s casualties. The Los Angeles Times notes that its early reception was modest, which the later reviews make hard to credit. The spread is narrow.

Little White Lies
17 October 2019 · 3/5/5 · BP Flanagan
100

The timeless musical remains an effervescent, life-affirming wonder that pokes fun at Hollywood’s transition to sound through brilliant comic set pieces and dance numbers. It celebrates joy and dreams while glossing over the industry’s less fortunate side.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★★ · Tony Sloman
100

A collection of talents at their peak generated an enjoyable and clever movie that evokes the excitement of making motion pictures. It is the supreme original, an affectionate parody of the sound era whose every incident actually happened, and a unique work of art from MGM at its height.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
14 February 1999 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The critic calls it one of the most fun and enduring movie musicals, praising its lighthearted joy, inventive dance numbers, and clever satire of Hollywood's transition to sound. He singles out the title dance and 'Make 'em Laugh' for their exuberance and technical brilliance.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Jason Anderson
95*

It is perhaps the greatest of movie musicals, the product of enormous toil yet defined by effervescence and joy that feels scarce today. Kelly and Donen’s masterwork is a meta celebration of Hollywood history with an inexhaustible bounty of ingenuity and unabashed showstoppers.

Read the full review →
Empire
26 January 2006 · Ian Freer
90*

The critic calls it one of the greatest musicals ever made, an ode to the joy of moviemaking, friendship and dance, with sophisticated integration of songs into the story and timeless appeal.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
25 February 2019 · Kenneth Turan
90*

The critic calls the film in a class by itself as the most durable example of the Hollywood musical, praising its exuberance and joy of performance as a theme and noting its impressive longevity in critic polls despite modest initial acclaim.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Singin' in the Rain worth watching?
Singin' in the Rain is worth watching for almost anyone, and we scored it 93. Stanley Donen and Gene Kelly turn Hollywood's move to sound into practical comedy, and Jean Hagen's Lina Lamont arguing with a microphone is reason enough on its own. The romance is thinly written, but if musicals usually test your patience, we would try this one before giving up on them.
How long is Singin' in the Rain, and what is it rated?
Singin' in the Rain runs 1h 43m and is rated G by the MPA in the US. It is a comedy and romance film.
Where can I watch Singin' in the Rain in the US?
Singin' in the Rain is streaming on HBO Max, Hulu, The Roku Channel and Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $5.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Singin' in the Rain compare to Top Hat?
Singin' in the Rain is the funnier film and the more complete one; Top Hat has the finer dancing. Two of the Astaire and Rogers numbers are as good as anything the cinema has managed, but the plot needs one plain sentence to fix it and the finale is too big. Kelly and Donen's film keeps its comedy and its dancing working together, so we would start there.
What should I watch after Singin' in the Rain?
After Singin' in the Rain, try Top Hat (1935, Fi1m 87): For dancing with wit, and romantic complications that know when to stop talking. Then The Young Girls of Rochefort (1967, Fi1m 84): For a whole town where colour, flirtation and dancing occupy nearly everyone; and Strictly Ballroom (1992, Fi1m 83): For competitive dancers whose formidable vanity makes the romance more entertaining.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1953

Nominated
Best Original Musical Score
Nominated
Best Supporting Actress

If you liked this, try…

  1. Top Hat (1935, Fi1m 87)For dancing with wit, and romantic complications that know when to stop talking.

  2. The Young Girls of Rochefort (1967, Fi1m 84)For a whole town where colour, flirtation and dancing occupy nearly everyone.

  3. Shall We Dance? (1996) · not reviewed yetFor the quieter pleasure of watching an inhibited adult learn to dance.

  4. Strictly Ballroom (1992, Fi1m 83)For competitive dancers whose formidable vanity makes the romance more entertaining.

  5. The Artist (2011, Fi1m 82)For another comedy about sound arriving before its leading man is ready.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever