Lee Marvin and Simone Signoret seated at a ship dining table with champagne
Film review

Ship of Fools

1965 · Directed by Stanley Kramer · 2h 29m · MPA NR

In a sentenceEvery passenger stands for something, and most of them tell you what before the soup arrives

In 1933 a German liner leaves Veracruz for Bremerhaven, first class above and a hold of Spanish labourers being shipped home below. Glocken (Michael Dunn), a dwarf, greets us from the rail and tells us we are all aboard. At the captain’s table Rieber (José Ferrer) explains that Germany’s troubles are the work of the Jews, and Lowenthal (Heinz Rühmann), a Jewish salesman, is politely moved to another table. Mary Treadwell (Vivien Leigh), an American divorcée, drinks and fends off Tenny (Lee Marvin), a washed-up baseball player. Jenny (Elizabeth Ashley) and David (George Segal) are young painters who cannot stop quarrelling. Dr. Schumann (Oskar Werner), the ship’s doctor, is sent to La Condesa (Simone Signoret), a Spanish countess travelling under guard to Tenerife, and finds a patient who wants something other than treatment.

Fi1m review

Stanley Kramer’s voyage from Veracruz to Bremerhaven in 1933 carries as fine a cast as the decade assembled and a script that explains each of them twice. Simone Signoret and Oskar Werner are worth the fare; the allegory around them is worth rather less.

Stanley Kramer made films about what was wrong with the century, and in 1965 he put most of it on a boat. Ship of Fools, from Katherine Anne Porter’s novel, sails a German liner from Veracruz to Bremerhaven in 1933, six years before the war, and fills its first-class deck with people who each stand for something: the drunk divorcée, the failed athlete, the quarrelling young artists, the anti-Semite, the Jew who will not believe him. Abby Mann’s screenplay gives each of them a speech. The cast is as good as any assembled in that decade; the script trusts none of them to make a point without saying it aloud. At 149 minutes, that is a lot of saying.

The middle of the film, and the reason to see it, is Simone Signoret and Oskar Werner. She plays La Condesa, a Spanish countess being taken under guard to Tenerife and dependent on the drugs the ship’s doctor controls; he plays Dr. Schumann, who has a bad heart and a wife at home and knows exactly what he is doing when he sits down on the edge of her bunk. Neither of them raises a voice. Signoret lets her face go slack and amused when the doctor lectures her, and Werner answers with a stillness that says he has already lost the argument with himself. They moved us more than we expected, and the reason is simple: they are the only two people on board who are not making a case. They are tired, and fond of each other, and running out of time.

Vivien Leigh, in her last film, plays Mary Treadwell as a woman who has decided to be brittle because the alternative is worse. She has a scene alone in her cabin, in front of a mirror, that tells us more about the character than Mann’s dialogue manages in an hour. Lee Marvin’s Tenny, a ballplayer who could never hit a curve and cannot stop telling people so, is coarse and sad and better than the film deserves. Michael Dunn’s Glocken opens the picture by speaking to us from the rail, and he is the one person on board allowed to be clever without being punished for it.

The trouble is everything the film wants to be about. José Ferrer’s Rieber announces at the captain’s table that Germany’s difficulties are the work of the Jews, and Heinz Rühmann’s Lowenthal, a salesman with a good line in jokes, keeps insisting the Germans will come to their senses. We know what is coming and so does Kramer, and he nudges us every ten minutes in case we have forgotten. Below decks the Spanish labourers are visited the way a charity visits, briefly and with music. Elizabeth Ashley and George Segal, as Jenny and David, fight about his painting and her body in scenes with the rhythm of a play and the insight of a magazine quiz. By the second hour we were weary, not of the ideas, which are sound, but of being told them again.

Ernest Laszlo shoots in black and white and stays close to faces, so the ship is mostly a set of expressions with a rail behind them. When he pulls back for the dining saloon or the deck at night, Robert Clatworthy’s sets are handsome and a little too clean, a liner that has never met salt water. Bill Thomas puts Leigh in evening gowns cut for a younger woman, which is the point. Ernest Gold’s score leans on the ship’s band, waltzes and tangos drifting in from the saloon, and is best when it is nearly not there. Robert C. Jones cuts between the couples with a fairness that becomes a problem: every affair gets its turn, in order, like guests at a wedding.

Kramer and Mann made Judgment at Nuremberg four years earlier, and that film had a courtroom, which gave the speeches somewhere to be. Here they happen over soup. Most critics at the time were warm, and the cast explains why; the one dissenting voice since calls the allegory heavy-handed, and it is. Both are right, which is why we land in the middle.

See it for Signoret and Werner, who could have carried a smaller film about two people in a cabin, and for Leigh, who is saying goodbye and seems to know it. The scenes in which a man tells you what Germany is about to do can be endured; you already know, and so did everyone in the cinema in 1965. It runs 149 minutes, and about ninety of them are good.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

70
Positive
3
Mixed
1
Negative
0

With only 4 reviews in so far, the lean is warm but not settled. Most critics single out the ensemble cast: Simone Signoret, Oskar Werner, Vivien Leigh and Michael Dunn recur in the praise, and the tender affair between the ship’s doctor and the condesa is picked out as the film’s emotional core. The reviews from the time treat it as intelligent, satisfying melodrama, skilfully directed. The one dissent comes later, from Time Out, which finds the allegory heavy-handed and the liberal message worn thin, rescued only by the acting. The spread is wide for so few reviews, and it splits roughly along the decades.

The New Yorker
24 July 1965 · Brendan Gill
90*

The critic hails the film as a potential classic melodrama with an exceptionally gifted ensemble cast and skillful direction that creates continuous bold encounters. He singles out the performances of Michael Dunn, George Segal, Elizabeth Ashley, and Lee Marvin for particular praise while noting the director's effective use of the camera on the actors' faces.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
1 August 1965 · Bosley Crowther
70*

The critic praises the film's focus on the tender, unselfish love affair between the ship's doctor (Oskar Werner) and the Spanish condesa (Simone Signoret) as its emotional core amid the passengers' troubles. This relationship stands in shining contrast to the hate and pettiness shown by other characters like the Nazi sympathizer and the embittered divorcée.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1964 · ** · Variety Staff
70*

The review finds that Kramer and Mann have successfully distilled the novel into an intelligent film that appeals to both intellect and emotions, calling it eminently satisfying screen entertainment most of the time. It highlights strong performances across the ensemble, especially from José Ferrer, Vivien Leigh, Simone Signoret, and Oskar Werner.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TM
50*

The critic notes the film's heavy-handed allegory set aboard a German ship in 1933 with a Jewish passenger, unfolding yards of liberal cliché. The superb cast, including Simone Signoret, Vivien Leigh and Michael Dunn, makes it almost watchable despite the flaws.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Ship of Fools worth watching?
Ship of Fools is worth watching for Simone Signoret and Oskar Werner, and for Vivien Leigh in her last film, and we scored it 62. The allegory around them, in which every first-class passenger stands for something and says so, wears thin well before the 149 minutes are up. Roughly ninety of those minutes are good.
How long is Ship of Fools, and what is it rated?
Ship of Fools runs 2h 29m and is rated NR by the MPA in the US. It is a drama and romance film.
Where can I watch Ship of Fools in the US?
Ship of Fools is streaming on The Roku Channel in the US. It leaves The Roku Channel on 1 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Ship of Fools, and is it suitable for children?
Ship of Fools has no UK certificate and is unrated in the US, and nothing in it is violent or frightening in the usual sense. It is a talky adult drama about drink, adultery, drug dependence and anti-Semitism aboard a German liner in 1933, and children will be bored rather than upset. Teenagers with patience for speeches may manage it.
How does Ship of Fools compare to Judgment at Nuremberg?
Ship of Fools is the weaker of the two Stanley Kramer and Abby Mann films, because Judgment at Nuremberg has a courtroom and its speeches have somewhere to be. Here they happen over soup. Watch Nuremberg if you want the ideas argued properly; watch Ship of Fools for its cast, and for Signoret and Werner in particular.
Is Ship of Fools based on a true story or a book?
Ship of Fools is based on Katherine Anne Porter's novel of the same name, not on a true story, though it is set on a real route in 1933 with the war six years off. Abby Mann's screenplay gives each passenger a speech and tells you what they stand for; you need not have read the book to follow it.
What should I watch after Ship of Fools?
After Ship of Fools, try Judgment at Nuremberg (1961, Fi1m 82): Kramer and Mann with a courtroom, which gives the speeches a reason to exist. Then The Shop on Main Street (1965, Fi1m 90): The same year, the same subject, told small and quiet and devastating.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1966

Nominated
Best Actor
Nominated
Best Actress
Nominated
Best Costume Design, Black-and-White
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Supporting Actor
Nominated
Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay
Won
Best Art Direction, Black and White
Won
Best Cinematography, Black-and-White

Golden Globes, 1965

Nominated
Best Actor – Motion Picture Drama
Nominated
Best Actress – Motion Picture Drama

If you liked this, try…

  1. Judgment at Nuremberg (1961, Fi1m 82)Kramer and Mann with a courtroom, which gives the speeches a reason to exist.

  2. Grand Hotel (1932) · not reviewed yetThe original strangers-under-one-roof picture, with Garbo, and far lighter on its feet.

  3. The Damned (1969) · not reviewed yetVisconti on a German family in 1933, richer and nastier and much less polite.

  4. The Shop on Main Street (1965, Fi1m 90)The same year, the same subject, told small and quiet and devastating.

  5. Mephisto (1981) · not reviewed yetKlaus Maria Brandauer as an actor who makes his peace with the new Germany.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever