a rider on a motorcycle approaching a massive illuminated structure at night
Film review

Star Trek

2009 · Directed by J.J. Abrams · 2h 07m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceThe Enterprise would be a quieter workplace without Kirk and Spock, and considerably less worth visiting

James T. Kirk (Chris Pine) is a cadet at the beginning of his career. His path towards the Enterprise brings him into contact with Commander Spock (Zachary Quinto), whose temperament clashes with his own. As Captain Nero (Eric Bana) threatens the crew, Kirk and Spock begin a working relationship complicated by rivalry. Around them are Dr Leonard ‘Bones’ McCoy (Karl Urban), Lieutenant Nyota Uhura (Zoe Saldaña) and Captain Christopher Pike (Bruce Greenwood). J.J. Abrams directs this account of the crew’s early days, following the formation of friendships among people who approach the same challenges in different ways.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

J.J. Abrams makes Star Trek a brisk, funny adventure, with Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto giving the familiar crew a convincing fresh start. The villain is thin and the action sometimes overworked, but the company earns our recommendation.

J.J. Abrams gets the important thing right: we want to spend time with this crew. His Star Trek returns to the characters’ early days, bringing them together with enough humour to make the introductions enjoyable in themselves. It is a funny, fast-moving adventure with an unusually engaging cast and a disappointingly ordinary villain. The film’s welcome extends to those who have never felt any obligation to keep up with the series.

Chris Pine plays the young James T. Kirk with an assurance that invites someone to object to him, and Zachary Quinto’s Spock is exactly the person for the job. Pine makes Kirk’s cockiness amusing without making him impossible company. Quinto is wonderfully exact about how much irritation can be allowed through Spock’s composure. We laughed at the friction between them, particularly the way Pine’s swagger meets Quinto’s refusal to be impressed. Their timing makes the developing friendship worth following even when the adventure is travelling at a speed that discourages questions.

Karl Urban gives Dr Leonard ‘Bones’ McCoy a welcome comic impatience, making the supporting company worth listening to as well. Zoe Saldaña’s Lieutenant Nyota Uhura brings enough confidence to avoid being crowded out by the central pairing. Bruce Greenwood, as Captain Christopher Pike, supplies a useful steadiness. These are small distinctions of temperament, but they matter in a film that has so many introductions to get through.

Scott Chambliss’s production design is a large part of that welcome. The updated look has a sense of fun, and does not treat every familiar element as something too important to play with. Dan Mindel’s cinematography gives the adventure brightness and bustle, although the sheer insistence of the images occasionally becomes tiring. Michael Giacchino’s score is rousing, and gives the friendships some weight amid all the movement.

Editors Maryann Brandon and Mary Jo Markey keep the competing demands of action, introductions and comedy moving at an energetic clip. That pace is useful, especially when the screenplay by Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman is busy getting familiar figures into place. It also makes the occasional excess of action harder to forgive: there are stretches where we wanted the film to settle down and let a conversation last. The jokes and the developing relationships are strong enough to bear that extra attention. Abrams sometimes seems less confident of this than his cast gives him reason to be.

Eric Bana’s Captain Nero is the clearest disappointment, a villain who gives the adventure a threat without supplying much individual interest. Bana has presence, but the writing does not give him the specificity that makes the crew so agreeable. Some of the action is similarly familiar, even when the staging is vigorous. For a film so good at persuading us that old characters can be interesting again, it is a pity that the opposition feels so readily replaceable.

The pleasure here is familiar to good ensemble adventure: different temperaments discover how much more interesting they are together. At 127 minutes, this could use a little less agitation, but the jokes and the performances make the length easy to forgive. No preparatory viewing is required; an appetite for people arguing competently in space should do.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

84
Positive
9
Mixed
0
Negative
0

Most critics welcome Star Trek as an energetic revival that respects familiar characters while making their early adventures accessible to newcomers. Praise centres on Abrams’s pace, humour and casting, with Chris Pine’s Kirk and Zachary Quinto’s Spock drawing particular attention for their rivalry and comic timing. The reviews also favour the effects and refreshed design. Many find that the action leaves enough space for friendships and character development to matter.

The differences are chiefly in the degree of enthusiasm, though some reservations are specific. Slant Magazine finds the opening weak, the film uneven and the villain and action short on originality, while still valuing the supporting cast and humour. Total Film, by contrast, singles out the opening as a strength. The Los Angeles Times notes an over-caffeinated quality and occasional missteps, but shares the broader view that Abrams successfully brings old and new together.

Screen Daily
22 April 2009
85*

Abrams is praised for injecting enormous energy into the long-running franchise and creating an immensely satisfying prequel with invigorating humour and strong casting. The review highlights the director’s understanding of modern audiences and the film’s potential as a summer hit.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
7 May 2009 · 4/4/4 · Jonathan Crocker
80

Abrams’s reboot is hailed as the most purely enjoyable blockbuster of the summer for its speed, style and exhilarating action sequences. The critic singles out the dynamic rivalry between Pine’s cocky Kirk and Quinto’s ice-cool Spock for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Kim Newman
80*

The review praises Abrams’s bold reimagining of the early days of the Star Trek crew. It highlights the love and respect with which the reboot has been mounted despite being a radical rethink.

Read the full review →
Time Out
5 May 2009 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

Abrams is commended for updating the franchise with enthusiasm and fun without dark allegory or excessive violence. The critic praises the witty design updates, strong cast and clever script that works for both fans and newcomers.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
· Andrew Collins
75*

The reboot is described as a successful revival of the classic formula with big-budget effects and in-jokes that appeal to new and old audiences alike. The young cast and Abrams’s direction are credited with breathing fresh life into the series.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
8 May 2009 · Kenneth Turan

The critic finds the film successful overall in bridging old and new, with a satisfying young-years setup and strong action sequences, though it has over-caffeinated aspects and occasional missteps; Abrams’ playful instinct for popular entertainment ultimately saves it.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Star Trek worth watching?
Star Trek is worth watching for anyone who enjoys a brisk, funny ensemble adventure, and we scored it 81. Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto make the friction between Kirk and Spock the film's chief pleasure, and the supporting company is worth listening to. The villain is thin and the action sometimes overworked, but the crew earns our recommendation.
How long is Star Trek, and what is it rated?
Star Trek runs 2h 07m and is rated PG-13 by the MPA in the US. It is a science fiction and action film.
Where can I watch Star Trek in the US?
Star Trek is streaming on Peacock, The Roku Channel, Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV in the US, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV and Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. It leaves Peacock on 1 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Star Trek, and is it suitable for children?
Star Trek is a 12A, and its action is vigorous rather than gruesome. The film moves fast, with a threatening villain and some sustained combat, but the tone stays light and the jokes come often. Younger children may find the pace and peril a lot to take; most older children and teenagers should manage it comfortably.
How does Star Trek compare to Star Trek: Nemesis?
Star Trek is the better film, and the more welcoming one. Where Star Trek: Nemesis sends a tired crew off with a car chase and corridor shootouts, Abrams introduces a young crew with humour and lets their temperaments do the work. Nemesis suits those saying goodbye to Picard's company; this one suits anyone, including newcomers.
Do you need to have seen the other Star Trek films before Star Trek?
Star Trek needs no prior viewing and is a good place to start. It returns to the crew's early days and introduces Kirk, Spock, McCoy and Uhura as if for the first time, so the film's welcome extends to people who have never kept up with the series. An appetite for people arguing competently in space is all that is required.
What should I watch after Star Trek?
After Star Trek, try Forbidden Planet (1956, Fi1m 81): For a more measured expedition, with scientific curiosity and a troublesome destination. Then The Fifth Element (1997, Fi1m 73): A busier, stranger future, carried by comic timing and cheerfully excessive design; and Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003, Fi1m 86): For shipboard competence, clashing temperaments and the pleasure of a crew working together.
What order should I watch the Star Trek films in?
Release order is the safe choice for Star Trek, and it is the order our collection page lists them in. Star Trek is number 11 of the 13 Star Trek titles on Fi1m; before it comes Star Trek: Nemesis and after it Star Trek Into Darkness. The full order.

Part of · 11 of 13

Star Trek

13 films on Fi1m · 1979–2016 · average 66 · best Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan 85

All 13 in order

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2010

Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Sound Editing
Nominated
Best Visual Effects
Won
Best Makeup and Hairstyling

BAFTA Film Awards, 2010

Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Special Visual Effects

Costume Designers Guild Award for Excellence in Fantasy Costume Design for Film, 2010

Nominated
Costume Designers Guild Award for Excellence in Fantasy Costume Design for Film

Grammy Award for Best Score Soundtrack for Visual Media, 2010

Nominated
Grammy Award for Best Score Soundtrack for Visual Media

Hugo Awards, 2010

Nominated
Best Dramatic Presentation, Long Form

MTV Movie Award for Best Breakthrough Performance, 2010

Nominated
MTV Movie Award for Best Breakthrough Performance

Producers Guild of America Award for Best Theatrical Motion Picture, 2010

Nominated
Producers Guild of America Award for Best Theatrical Motion Picture

SAG Awards, 2010

Won
Outstanding Performance by a Stunt Ensemble in a Motion Picture

Writers Guild of America Award for Best Adapted Screenplay, 2010

Nominated
Writers Guild of America Award for Best Adapted Screenplay

Boston Society of Film Critics Award for Best Cast, 2009

Won
Boston Society of Film Critics Award for Best Cast

Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Action Film, 2009

Nominated
Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Action Film

Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Cast, 2009

Nominated
Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Cast

Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Makeup, 2009

Nominated
Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Makeup

Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Sound, 2009

Nominated
Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Sound

Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Visual Effects, 2009

Nominated
Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Visual Effects

Las Vegas Film Critics Society Award for Best Score, 2009

Won
Las Vegas Film Critics Society Award for Best Score

Saturn Awards, 2009

Nominated
Best Science Fiction Film
Nominated
Best Special Effects
Nominated
Best Writing
Won
Best Make-up

Teen Choice Award for Best Villain, 2009

Nominated
Teen Choice Award for Best Villain

World Soundtrack Award for Soundtrack Composer of the Year, 2009

Nominated
World Soundtrack Award for Soundtrack Composer of the Year

Satellite Award for Best Visual Effects, 1997

Nominated
Satellite Award for Best Visual Effects

If you liked this, try…

  1. Forbidden Planet (1956, Fi1m 81)For a more measured expedition, with scientific curiosity and a troublesome destination.

  2. Galaxy Quest (1999) · not reviewed yetAnother argumentative space crew, with affection for the job beneath the jokes.

  3. The Fifth Element (1997, Fi1m 73)A busier, stranger future, carried by comic timing and cheerfully excessive design.

  4. Space Sweepers (2021) · not reviewed yetA Korean space adventure whose bickering crew makes the machinery worth following.

  5. Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003, Fi1m 86)For shipboard competence, clashing temperaments and the pleasure of a crew working together.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever