Spock (Zachary Quinto) stands with two officers in a white corridor
Film review

Star Trek Into Darkness

2013 · Directed by J.J. Abrams · 2h 12m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceEveryone sprints, everything flares, and the film’s best ideas turn out to be somebody else’s

The USS Enterprise is fleeing across a planet of red trees called Nibiru, where Captain James T. Kirk (Chris Pine) has broken Starfleet’s first rule to save a primitive people from a volcano and Commander Spock (Zachary Quinto) has nearly died inside it. Back on Earth Kirk is demoted for it and Admiral Christopher Pike (Bruce Greenwood) takes the ship back. Then a Starfleet officer called John Harrison (Benedict Cumberbatch) blows up an archive in London and attacks a gathering of the fleet’s commanders in San Francisco. Admiral Alexander Marcus (Peter Weller) sends Kirk after him to the Klingon homeworld with 72 experimental torpedoes and orders to fire them from a distance. Spock objects to killing a man without trial, Montgomery Scott (Simon Pegg) objects to the torpedoes, and a science officer called Carol Marcus (Alice Eve) turns up unannounced.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

J.J. Abrams’s second Star Trek is fast, loud and easy to like, with a cast that has grown into its uniforms and a villain who barely needs to raise his voice. Then it runs out of its own ideas and starts borrowing, and the borrowing shows.

Four years after he got Star Trek back on its feet, J.J. Abrams has made a sequel that wants to be bigger, darker and quicker at once, and for an hour it manages two of the three. The film opens at a sprint across a planet of red trees and chalk-white natives, Kirk and McCoy fleeing a temple they have just robbed while Spock waits inside a volcano to freeze it before it erupts. We were grinning within two minutes. It is the whole film in one scene: a chase, a joke, a friend in danger and a cut before anyone can ask a question.

The crew is the reason to go. Chris Pine’s Kirk is still the boy who cheated on the exam, and the script by Damon Lindelof, Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci has the sense to let his superiors notice. Zachary Quinto’s Spock gets the best scene, an argument with Uhura (Zoe Saldaña) in a shuttle about why he was so calm about dying, and he plays it as a man who has been caught out. Karl Urban’s McCoy grumbles in metaphors until Kirk tells him to stop. Simon Pegg’s Scotty is given a conscience and a resignation, and Pegg plays both straight.

Benedict Cumberbatch’s John Harrison first appears in a London hospital, offering a desperate father a way to save his daughter, and it is the quietest scene in the film. He speaks low and slowly and hardly moves, so when he does move, taking a Klingon patrol apart single-handed in a ruined city while the Enterprise landing party stand and watch, the film has earned the shock. For its first half it knows what it has in him.

Dan Mindel shoots wide and bright, and his lens flares are back, streaking across every window and console until the white bridge seems lit from inside. Scott Chambliss builds a San Francisco of glass towers and a Klingon ruin of grey-green stone and standing water, the one place in the film that seems to have weather. Michael Kaplan puts the admirals in grey dress uniforms with peaked caps, which is meant to make us uneasy about Starfleet and does. Michael Giacchino’s brass theme swells on cue; his London music, strings over a low pulse, is the better work. Mary Jo Markey and Maryann Brandon cut the first hour so that nothing sits still for longer than a line.

The trouble is the second hour. Having set up an argument worth having, an admiral (Peter Weller, growling) who wants an enemy killed from a distance without a trial and a first officer who will not allow it, the script drops it and starts quoting. Scenes, lines and a whole climactic situation are lifted from one of the original-cast films, and we will not say which; anyone who has seen it will know within seconds, and anyone who has not will wonder why the actors have gone so solemn. We sat there feeling embarrassed on the film’s behalf. The older film had earned those moments over two hours and a decade of television, and this one asks for the same tears on two films’ acquaintance. It does not get them.

There is also Alice Eve, cast as a science officer called Carol Marcus and then asked to strip to her underwear in a shuttle for no reason the film can offer. It lasts a few seconds and cost the film more of our goodwill than any hole in the plot. Anton Yelchin’s Chekov is sent to the engine room and largely forgotten. John Cho gets one good scene in the captain’s chair. Leonard Nimoy turns up to help the writers out of a corner.

The 2009 film worked because it was about nothing except how these people met, and it was quick about it. This one wants to be about drone strikes and the cost of revenge, raises both in dialogue and settles neither. The television programme all this descends from was slow and cheap and would stop the plot for ten minutes to have an argument. We would not want that back exactly, but we missed it.

See it for the crew and for Cumberbatch’s first hour, and go in knowing the second is a cover version. It runs 132 minutes and carries a 12A, which given the body count seems generous.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

68
Positive
12
Mixed
4
Negative
2

Most critics like it. The reviews agree that this is a brisk, good-humoured action sequel that moves faster than the 2009 film and matches or betters its scale, and that Abrams stages the set pieces with clarity and energy. Praise clusters on Benedict Cumberbatch, whose villain nearly every reviewer singles out, and on the ensemble, with Zachary Quinto’s Spock and Karl Urban named as the crew members who register most.

The reservations cluster on nerve. Several reviews find the film plays safe, revisits familiar ground and never raises the bar set by its predecessor; others call the plotting clunky and the relentless pace tiring. The spread is wide. The New York Times finds it swaps the series’ humanist ideals for blockbuster action, Collider objects to its reuse of material from an earlier Star Trek film, and The Hollywood Reporter, alone among the reviews, finds Abrams’s direction flat and mechanical rather than showy.

Screen Daily
2 May 2013
90*

The review praises the thrilling sci-fi adventure, stunning effects and further development of familiar yet fresh characters, highlighting Benedict Cumberbatch's terrific performance as the morally complex villain.

Read the full review →
Variety
2 May 2013 · Scott Foundas
90*

Abrams delivers a sequel equal or superior to the 2009 film with grander scale, richly human characters and a pleasurable ride. Cumberbatch brings exotic grandeur as the villain in a well-crafted blockbuster.

Read the full review →
Empire
9 May 2013 · Ian Freer
85*

The critic praises the film as a blast of fun, funny, spectacular and exhilarating action cinema that follows the principles of the first reboot but amps them up further, with strong performances especially from Benedict Cumberbatch and a showman director in J.J. Abrams.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
14 May 2013 · Chris Cabin
80*

Praises the clarity and inventiveness of Abrams’s direction that keeps the drama and action percolating, along with the moral complexity and emotional rigors of the narrative.

Read the full review →
Time Out
30 April 2013 · ★★★★ · Dave Calhoun
80

The critic describes it as a brisk, no-nonsense sci-fi action sequel that is modest, fun and briefly amusing with strong villain work by Cumberbatch, but notes it is a stop-gap tale that does not break new ground.

Read the full review →
Total Film
9 May 2013 · Matthew Leyland
80*

The critic calls it fantastic fun overall, a faster-paced sequel that papers over cracks from the first film with an intriguing villain and thrilling set pieces, though it risks peril-fatigue and sidelines some characters.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Star Trek Into Darkness worth watching?
Star Trek Into Darkness is worth watching for the crew and for Benedict Cumberbatch's first hour, and we scored it 60. The second hour drops the argument it has set up and starts quoting an older Star Trek film, asking for tears it has not earned. Go in for the company, not the story.
How long is Star Trek Into Darkness, and what is it rated?
Star Trek Into Darkness runs 2h 12m and is rated PG-13 by the MPA in the US. It is an action and adventure film.
Where can I watch Star Trek Into Darkness in the US?
Star Trek Into Darkness is streaming on Peacock, Paramount+, Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV and The Roku Channel in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from $3.99. It leaves Peacock on 1 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Star Trek Into Darkness compare to Star Trek?
Star Trek Into Darkness is bigger, darker and quicker than the 2009 Star Trek, and the earlier film is the better of the two. The first was about nothing except how these people met and was quick about it; the sequel has a stronger villain but raises questions about revenge and killing without trial and settles none of them. Newcomers should start with the first.
Do you need to have seen the other Star Trek films before Star Trek Into Darkness?
Star Trek Into Darkness does not require any earlier Star Trek, though it helps to have seen the 2009 film, which introduces this crew and explains Kirk's rise. Its second half borrows heavily from one of the original-cast films, and those who know that film will recognise it within seconds; those who do not may wonder why everyone has gone so solemn.
What should I watch after Star Trek Into Darkness?
After Star Trek Into Darkness, try Star Trek (2009, Fi1m 81): The reboot itself: the same crew meeting for the first time, with less borrowed. Then Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003, Fi1m 86): A ship, a captain, a doctor who argues with him; no phasers required; and The Expanse (2015, Fi1m 64): Space politics taken seriously, with crews who bicker and physics that hurts.
What order should I watch the Star Trek films in?
Release order is the safe choice for Star Trek, and it is the order our collection page lists them in. Star Trek Into Darkness is number 12 of the 13 Star Trek titles on Fi1m; before it comes Star Trek and after it Star Trek Beyond. The full order.

Part of · 12 of 13

Star Trek

13 films on Fi1m · 1979–2016 · average 66 · best Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan 85

All 13 in order

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2014

Nominated
Best Visual Effects

If you liked this, try…

  1. Star Trek (2009, Fi1m 81)The reboot itself: the same crew meeting for the first time, with less borrowed.

  2. Galaxy Quest (1999) · not reviewed yetA parody that understands the original series better than most of its sequels do.

  3. Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003, Fi1m 86)A ship, a captain, a doctor who argues with him; no phasers required.

  4. The Expanse (2015, Fi1m 64)Space politics taken seriously, with crews who bicker and physics that hurts.

  5. Sunshine (2007, Fi1m 74)Danny Boyle’s crew-in-peril film, small in cast and large in light.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever