Aaron Cross (Jeremy Renner) and Dr. Marta Shearing (Rachel Weisz) riding a motorcycle through city streets
Film review

The Bourne Legacy

2012 · Directed by Tony Gilroy · 2h 15m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceJason Bourne is elsewhere, so the grown-ups sit in an office for two hours and talk about him

Aaron Cross (Jeremy Renner) is alone in the Alaskan wilderness, swimming frozen rivers and counting his pills. He is an agent of Outcome, a programme that sharpens its people chemically, and he is heading for a cabin where another Outcome man (Oscar Isaac) is waiting out the cold. In Washington, Jason Bourne has put Treadstone on the front page, and a programme manager called Byer (Edward Norton) decides Outcome must be shut down along with everyone in it. A drone finds the cabin. In a Maryland laboratory, Dr. Marta Shearing (Rachel Weisz), who has spent years dosing agents she has never met, watches a colleague lock the doors and take out a gun. Cross wants his medication and a way out; Byer wants nobody left to ask about either.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Tony Gilroy has the actors, the cameraman and a good final chase, and he spends the first ninety minutes explaining a programme nobody asked about. Renner and Weisz make it watchable; the film around them is a briefing with a motorbike chase attached.

Tony Gilroy wrote all three of the Bourne films that starred Matt Damon, and The Bourne Legacy is what he made when Damon and director Paul Greengrass did not come back for a fourth. His answer is a sideways step: keep the world, lose the man. Aaron Cross (Jeremy Renner) belongs to Outcome, a programme running alongside Treadstone, and when Bourne’s exposure of Treadstone threatens to bring everything else down with it, Byer (Edward Norton) starts killing his own people to keep it quiet. That is a workable idea for a thriller. The trouble is that Gilroy has decided to explain it, at length, before anything else is allowed to happen.

The first hour crosscuts between Cross in Alaska, Marta Shearing (Rachel Weisz) in her laboratory and a great many men in shirtsleeves in rooms full of screens. Gilroy is good at rooms; Michael Clayton was mostly rooms. Norton plays Byer as a tired administrator who believes what he is doing is necessary and takes no pleasure in it, and Stacy Keach, as Turso, gets to be blunt where Norton is careful. But the dialogue keeps circling the same four facts: there is a programme, there are pills, the pills are dangerous, the programme must go. We were bored, and then we were irritated about it, because we could see how much talent was waiting outside the door.

When the film does go outside, Robert Elswit shoots it in clean wide frames rather than the shaken handheld the series became known for under Greengrass. The Alaskan passages have real cold in them: Cross hauling himself out of a river, a cabin under grey light, a drone circling over white ground. John Gilroy cuts these sequences with patience, holding a shot long enough for us to read the landscape before something arrives in it. It is a different idea of how a Bourne film should look, and a defensible one.

The scene in Marta’s laboratory is the best thing in the film, and we will say only that it comes early and that it is horrible. A colleague locks a door. The camera stays with Weisz’s face as she works out what is happening, and James Newton Howard’s score does almost nothing, which is the right call. We were frightened in a way the chases never manage, because for once nobody on screen has been trained for what is in front of them. It shows Gilroy can do this when he lets the talking stop.

Renner and Weisz keep the middle upright. Renner plays Cross as rougher and chattier than Bourne, quick with a sour joke and plainly worried about his own head, and he sells the odd premise that the hero’s overriding goal is a refill. Weisz, given a scientist who has spent years dosing people she never met, does the guilt without speeches. Their scenes together in her house and on the road are the warmest in the film, and if Gilroy had trusted them with more of the running time he would have a better picture. Oscar Isaac has one good scene in a cabin. Joan Allen, David Strathairn, Scott Glenn and Albert Finney turn up for a line or two each and serve mainly to remind you of films you liked more.

Then Manila. The motorbike chase through its streets is long, fast and staged with real skill, Elswit low behind the wheels and John Gilroy cutting on the movement. Kevin Thompson’s production design is at its best here, in a city of concrete, tin and traffic pressed close enough to touch. It is what the whole film has been saving up for. It is also a good deal longer than it needs to be, and by its last minutes we had stopped feeling anything except a mild wish for it to finish. At 135 minutes the film runs the length of a Bourne picture with about half the action of one.

Against the series’ own standards it is the weakest of the four, and against Gilroy’s own it is a script that would have been shorter if someone else had been directing it. The reviews so far are split down the middle, and we can see both halves. If watching Edward Norton run a meeting is your idea of an evening, and there are evenings for that, the first hour is for you. Everyone else will want one of the Damon three.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

51
Positive
5
Mixed
8
Negative
9

The reviews split almost evenly, with more negative notices than positive and a large middle ground of mild disappointment. Where critics agree, it is on the cast: Jeremy Renner is widely credited with a committed, rougher lead performance, and Rachel Weisz is singled out alongside him for keeping the film human. The Manila motorbike chase near the end is the one set piece named again and again as the film doing what the series promises.

The complaints cluster just as tightly. Most critics find the film weighed down by exposition about the agency’s inner workings, with too little action and a plot that leans heavily on the previous trilogy; the absence of Matt Damon is felt throughout. The spread is wide: the Los Angeles Times calls it an exemplary thriller worthy of its predecessors, while The Telegraph finds it overlong and close to parody. The warmest notices come from American outlets; the British press is largely unimpressed.

Los Angeles Times
9 August 2012 · Kenneth Turan
85*

The critic calls it an exemplary espionage thriller that lives up to its predecessors, praising its complex plotting, resonant emotional moments, and impeccable cast including Renner, Weisz, and Norton. Gilroy expands the Bourne universe effectively while maintaining the franchise's cool intelligence.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
6 August 2012
85*

Swapping in Renner for Damon and expanding the narrative to a parallel story, the film delivers smart action kicks as a fantastic, well-constructed piece of pop entertainment with an air of erudite emotional remove. Strong performances root and elevate it, with mystery, danger, scheming, and action in balanced order.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
10 August 2012 · John Wildman
70*

The critic notes that the film works against lowered expectations for a fourth entry without Matt Damon, crediting Gilroy's direction and Renner's charismatic lead performance alongside Weisz. It delivers grounded acting and adrenaline-fueled action while keeping the franchise's spirit alive as an effective bridge.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Alan Jones
60

After a convoluted opening that confusingly links to the earlier films, the director picks up the pace in this smaller-scale but well-crafted thriller. Highlights include a tense shoot-out and a motorbike chase finale through Manila's streets.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
6 August 2012 · David Denby
60*

The critic finds the film enjoyable with strong set pieces like the motorcycle chase but notes it lacks the continuous momentum of prior entries and feels more conventional. Without Matt Damon, the series loses much of its soul and emotional depth despite Renner's capable performance.

Read the full review →
Vulture
10 August 2012 · David Edelstein
60*

The film has a botched opening, limp ending, and uneven action but delivers a paranoid rush in the middle, particularly through one well-executed sequence and Rachel Weisz's performance. It leans on franchise familiarity for its appeal despite cynical execution.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Bourne Legacy worth watching?
The Bourne Legacy is only worth watching for series completists and for anyone who enjoys watching Edward Norton run a meeting, and we scored it 54. Renner and Weisz keep it upright and the Manila motorbike chase is staged with real skill, but the first ninety minutes are largely men in rooms explaining a programme. Most viewers will want one of the Damon three instead.
How long is The Bourne Legacy, and what is it rated?
The Bourne Legacy runs 2h 15m and is rated PG-13 by the MPA in the US. It is an action and thriller film.
Where can I watch The Bourne Legacy in the US?
The Bourne Legacy is streaming on Starz, The Roku Channel, Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV in the US, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV and Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. It leaves The Roku Channel on 1 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The Bourne Legacy, and is it suitable for children?
The Bourne Legacy is a 12A, and its violence is mostly the fast, bloodless kind: drone strikes, fights and a long motorbike chase. The exception is an early scene in a laboratory in which a colleague locks a door and takes out a gun, which we found more frightening than anything in the chases and which younger children may find upsetting. Teenagers used to action thrillers will be fine.
How does The Bourne Legacy compare to The Bourne Ultimatum?
The Bourne Legacy is the weaker film beside The Bourne Ultimatum, and the two are different in kind. Ultimatum is a lean chase picture that barely stops moving and is shot in shaking handheld; Legacy is cleaner and steadier to look at, and spends most of its length in offices talking. Anyone who wants a Bourne film for the running should choose the earlier one.
Do you need to have seen the other Bourne films before The Bourne Legacy?
The Bourne Legacy can be followed without the earlier films, since Jason Bourne never appears and Aaron Cross is a new character, but it is not a good place to start. The plot turns on Bourne having exposed Treadstone, and several familiar faces appear for a line or two purely to remind you of the previous three. Newcomers should begin with the Damon films.
What should I watch after The Bourne Legacy?
After The Bourne Legacy, try The Bourne Ultimatum (2007, Fi1m 85): Gilroy’s script, Greengrass’s camera, Damon’s face: everything this one is missing. Then Michael Clayton (2007, Fi1m 86): Gilroy directing men in rooms, and here the rooms are the whole point; and Three Days of the Condor (1975, Fi1m 80): Redford on the run from his own employers, without any pills.
What order should I watch the Bourne films in?
Release order is the safe choice for Bourne, and it is the order our collection page lists them in. The Bourne Legacy is number 4 of the 5 Bourne titles on Fi1m; before it comes The Bourne Ultimatum and after it Jason Bourne. The full order.

Part of · 4 of 5

Bourne

5 films on Fi1m · 2002–2016 · average 73 · best The Bourne Ultimatum 85

All 5 in order

Cast

Awards

SAG Awards, 2013

Nominated
Outstanding Performance by a Stunt Ensemble in a Motion Picture

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Bourne Ultimatum (2007, Fi1m 85)Gilroy’s script, Greengrass’s camera, Damon’s face: everything this one is missing.

  2. Michael Clayton (2007, Fi1m 86)Gilroy directing men in rooms, and here the rooms are the whole point.

  3. Three Days of the Condor (1975, Fi1m 80)Redford on the run from his own employers, without any pills.

  4. Hanna (2011) · not reviewed yetAnother laboratory child loose in the world, with a better sense of humour.

  5. Ronin (1998, Fi1m 80)Frankenheimer’s car chases through France; the plot matters less than the driving.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever