Tommy (James Franco) walking arm in arm with two women in evening wear
Film review

The Disaster Artist

2017 · Directed by James Franco · 1h 44m · MPA R

In a sentenceEveryone on this film set needs a quiet word with the director, who is busy playing the lead

In Hollywood, Greg (Dave Franco) and Tommy (James Franco) share ambitions to act and a friendship shaped by Tommy’s confidence. They set about making The Room, with Tommy directing and playing Johnny, Greg playing Mark and Juliette (Ari Graynor) taking the role of Lisa. Tommy wants a film that proves his talent, but his certainty runs well ahead of his ability to direct actors and organise a production. Greg finds himself working alongside a friend whose determination keeps the work moving and whose volatile behaviour makes it difficult.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

James Franco makes filmmaking incompetence funny without treating ambition as a joke. His performance gives this comedy warmth and discomfort, but the thinly drawn friendship and forgiving script keep it from cutting much deeper.

The Disaster Artist is a funny, warm account of filmmaking incompetence, weakened by its eagerness to find something admirable in almost everybody involved. James Franco directs and plays Tommy, the would-be filmmaker whose certainty carries him into making The Room. The comedy comes from watching that certainty survive contact with actors and crew who have to put it to practical use. Franco understands the appeal of someone who keeps trying, although he is less curious about what everybody else owes such a person.

The accent, the appearance and the abrupt changes of mood give Franco plenty to work with, and he does not rush to make Tommy likeable. His performance makes the man’s belief in himself both funny and awkward to watch. We laughed at the voice, then felt uncomfortable about laughing at the man. The discomfort comes from Franco’s earnestness: Tommy takes his attempts at filmmaking seriously, even when the people around him cannot. Franco gives us time to feel bad about it.

Dave Franco’s Greg gives Tommy somebody to impress and somebody whose approval matters, and the quieter performance calms scenes that might otherwise become exhausting. Yet Scott Neustadter and Michael H. Weber’s screenplay is too content to let this friendship explain itself. Shared ambition gets the men together; the film needs a clearer sense of why Greg remains so invested in Tommy when being his friend becomes hard work. Dave Franco is sympathetic, but Greg is too often left responding to the more conspicuous performance.

Chris L. Spellman’s production design makes the recreations of The Room convincing enough to be funny without requiring a running explanation. Brandon Trost’s cinematography keeps attention on the performers, a sensible choice when the trouble is usually a person attempting something beyond him. The images are not especially memorable on their own, but they serve the comedy. Seth Rogen’s Sandy adds welcome impatience to scenes that could otherwise become too indulgent towards Tommy.

Stacey Schroeder’s editing gives the production mishaps a brisk rhythm, with enough time to register the discomfort as well as the joke. At 104 minutes, the film does not exhaust its supply of absurd behaviour, though the emotional passages feel more familiar than the business of getting a scene made. Dave Porter’s music is less helpful when it encourages us to feel fond of Tommy. The actors have already given us enough reason to care.

Ed Wood is the obvious comparison, but the more useful question is how far a comedy about bad filmmaking should protect its subject. Franco does show jealousy and delusion, and there is enough unpleasantness here to stop Tommy becoming merely a lovable eccentric. Yet the film keeps treating persistence as a reason to forgive behaviour it has just made us question. The supporting characters could have carried more of that discomfort if the script had given them the time.

Knowing The Room will make the recreations more rewarding, but prior study is not necessary. The recognisable problem is somebody with unchecked confidence making a job difficult for everybody else, and that needs little introduction. We would choose this for an evening when affection and embarrassment sound like a workable mixture. Just do not expect it to ask much of the man causing the trouble.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

76
Positive
19
Mixed
4
Negative
0
The Guardian
3 December 2017 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

James Franco delivers a meticulous, affectionate recreation of the chaotic making of Tommy Wiseau’s cult disasterpiece The Room, turning the story into a tragicomic tour de force. The film succeeds by convincingly portraying Wiseau not just as a terrible filmmaker but as a genuine, if deluded, dreamer, much like Tim Burton’s Ed Wood.

Read the full review →
The Times
8 December 2017 · ★★★★☆ · Kevin Maher
90*

In the spirit of Ed Wood and The Producers, the film celebrates the phenomenon of a work so bad it’s good, with Franco nailing the deluded overachiever Tommy Wiseau through pitch-perfect accent, appearance and volatile behaviour drawn from the source memoir. It tracks the odd-couple friendship and disastrous production with hilarious, meta energy.

Read the full review →
Variety
13 March 2017 · Critics Pick · Peter Debruge
85*

This studio-made comedy is the most fascinating movie of James Franco's wildly eccentric oeuvre and the best and most professional entry on his résumé. It captures the sheer ineptitude of Wiseau’s endeavor while providing a revisionist take on “The Room’s” transformation into an inadvertent comedy.

Read the full review →
Empire
6 December 2017 · John Nugent
80*

The film is a sincere and sporadically funny tribute to failing in Hollywood and the noble pursuit of dreams despite ridicule. It praises the earnest tone, the recreation of scenes from The Room, and Franco's performance as Wiseau as a comedy masterclass.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
6 December 2017 · 4/4/3 · Hannah Strong
80

The review finds the film funny, heartfelt and bizarre, with Franco's performance as Wiseau being sincere and mesmerizing. It praises the warmth and compassion but notes it falls into formulaic territory and doesn't fully ignite as a cult classic.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
7 December 2017 · Matthew Taylor
80*

The critic praises Franco's portrayal of Tommy Wiseau as a sensational physical performance that captures his mannerisms and self-delusion poignantly. The film is seen as spinning tragicomic gold from the source material's absurdity, though it highlights the pathos in Wiseau's delusions.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Disaster Artist worth watching?
The Disaster Artist is worth watching for anyone who finds affection and embarrassment a workable mixture, and we scored it 74. James Franco's performance as Tommy makes the man's confidence both funny and awkward to sit through, but the friendship at its centre is thinly written and the script forgives him too readily. The recreations of The Room reward familiarity without requiring it.
How long is The Disaster Artist, and what is it rated?
The Disaster Artist runs 1h 44m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a comedy and drama film.
Where can I watch The Disaster Artist in the US?
The Disaster Artist is streaming on Tubi in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $2.99. It leaves Tubi on 1 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The Disaster Artist, and is it suitable for children?
The Disaster Artist is a 15 in the UK and R in the US, and it contains no violence or frights to speak of; its discomfort comes from watching a man humiliate himself and exasperate his crew. The certificate points to adult language and content rather than anything alarming. It is unsuitable for young children and of little interest to them, but teenagers who can take the swearing should be fine.
How does The Disaster Artist compare to Ed Wood?
The Disaster Artist is the brisker and more uncomfortable of the two, while Ed Wood is the kinder and sadder. Both follow a hopeful director who mistakes persistence for talent, but Tim Burton allows more room for melancholy and runs longer, and James Franco is less willing to let his subject become a lovable eccentric. Choose Burton's film for warmth, Franco's for the squirm of a bad set.
What should I watch after The Disaster Artist?
After The Disaster Artist, try Ed Wood (1994, Fi1m 84): Another hopeful director mistakes persistence for talent, with more room for sadness. Then The King of Comedy (1982, Fi1m 88): For a colder look at ambition that survives every discouraging piece of evidence.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2017

Nominated
Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay

If you liked this, try…

  1. Ed Wood (1994, Fi1m 84)Another hopeful director mistakes persistence for talent, with more room for sadness.

  2. American Movie (1999) · not reviewed yetA documentary about stubborn amateur filmmaking, with affection earned through prolonged, exasperated attention.

  3. Day for Night (1973) · not reviewed yetA film crew’s work and private lives compete for attention, with room for everybody.

  4. One Cut of the Dead (2017) · not reviewed yetGo in knowing little; the pleasures of collective filmmaking emerge through mounting chaos.

  5. The King of Comedy (1982, Fi1m 88)For a colder look at ambition that survives every discouraging piece of evidence.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever