Richard Kimble (Harrison Ford) running alongside a moving train in a station
Film review

The Fugitive

1993 · Directed by Andrew Davis · 2h 11m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceHarrison Ford runs for his life while Tommy Lee Jones makes catching him look like a perfectly reasonable day’s work

Surgeon Richard Kimble (Harrison Ford) is wrongly convicted of murdering his wife, Helen (Sela Ward). He insists that a one-armed man is responsible. On the run, he tries to find the killer while Samuel Gerard (Tommy Lee Jones), the marshal pursuing him, works to bring him back into custody. Kimble needs to prove what happened; Gerard needs to catch the man who has escaped. Andrew Davis directs a chase thriller in which the search for evidence must compete with the immediate business of staying free.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Andrew Davis makes an unusually satisfying chase thriller, with Harrison Ford supplying the worry and Tommy Lee Jones the dry humour. Some of the action strains belief, but the pursuit remains absorbing.

The Fugitive takes a familiar thriller problem seriously: how does a man keep thinking when he has to keep running? Andrew Davis gives the pursuit pace without making either of its central figures seem foolish, and the result is a thoroughly satisfying evening’s suspense. Harrison Ford’s Richard Kimble, a surgeon wrongly convicted of his wife’s murder, has a reason to run that needs no embellishment. Tommy Lee Jones’s Samuel Gerard has a job to do, and the film understands how interesting it can be to watch someone do it well.

Ford is particularly good at making thought look like effort. Kimble never seems to have stepped outside his predicament to admire his own ingenuity, and the physical strain stops his intelligence from becoming a convenient scriptwriter’s gift. The grief matters, too: Ford gives the chase a subdued unhappiness that survives all the running. We keep wanting him to have a moment to recover, even though stopping is scarcely an option.

Jones gives Gerard the briskness of a man who regards drama as something other people bring to work. His humour comes from impatience and exactness, and Davis lets it relieve the tension without making the danger look silly. Gerard’s confidence also gives Ford something useful to resist: being pursued by this man makes staying free seem an achievement. There is enough personality in Jones’s delivery to keep the procedural business lively without requiring the film to stop for a joke.

We flinched at the train crash. Michael Chapman’s cinematography makes the machinery feel heavy and the human body exposed, so the spectacle produces alarm before admiration. J. Dennis Washington’s production design keeps the surroundings solid and functional, which helps this extravagant action belong to the same film as the quieter business of pursuit. The sequence works because Kimble remains the person we are looking for amid the destruction.

Dennis Virkler, Dov Hoenig, Dean Goodhill, David Finfer, Don Brochu and Richard Nord share the editing credit. The cutting sustains the pressure without treating every pause as a mistake, allowing a look or a clipped exchange to register before moving on. James Newton Howard’s score reinforces the urgency, but occasionally insists on an excitement the actors and images have already supplied. That is a small irritation in a film whose pace is otherwise so well judged.

David Twohy and Jeb Stuart’s screenplay gives both men enough intelligence to make their contest worth following. It is less persuasive when Kimble’s continued escape depends on surviving action that grows harder to credit. We can accept an exceptional escape, but Davis keeps asking for indulgence after the characters have done enough to secure our interest. A little less spectacle would have made the pursuit more credible.

For a chase thriller, this has an unusually convincing respect for competence: we can enjoy Gerard’s work without wanting Kimble caught. Its treatment of wrongful conviction is too brisk to bear much scrutiny, but the immediate injustice is enough to make us care. At 131 minutes, Davis allows the contest room to develop without letting it settle down. Give it an evening when everyone agrees to leave their questions about survival until afterwards.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

79
Positive
7
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics greet The Fugitive as an intelligent, tightly paced thriller, with praise clustering around Andrew Davis’s direction and the pairing of Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee Jones. The reviews credit Davis with sustaining suspense through large action sequences, particularly the train crash, without losing the wit or clarity of the chase. Ford’s performance earns broad approval, while Jones’s wisecracking marshal often attracts the stronger notices. Several critics also praise the screenplay’s economy and crisp dialogue.

The reservations concern formula and plausibility, though the spread runs from strong enthusiasm to one distinctly mixed assessment. Time Out finds the chase glossy and formulaic, while still admiring Jones and Ford’s handling of the physical demands. The Independent dissents more sharply, dismissing the story as silly and objecting to its treatment of the legal system. Even that review finds vitality in Jones, making his performance the clearest point of agreement across the divide.

RogerEbert.com
6 August 1993 · Roger Ebert
95*

Davis’ “The Fugitive” is one of the best entertainments of the year, a tense, taut and expert thriller that becomes an allegory about an innocent man in a world prepared to crush him. The critic singles out the virtuoso train crash sequence and the performances of Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee Jones for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
6 August 1993 · Kenneth Turan
90*

“The Fugitive” is a super-adrenalized stemwinder, a crisp and jolting melodrama that screws the tension so pitilessly tight. The critic singles out the intelligence, wit, and the duel between Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee Jones as a confrontation to remember.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
6 August 1993 · Janet Maslin
90*

The film version of “The Fugitive” turns out to be a smashing success, a juggernaut of an action-adventure saga. The critic singles out the direction by Andrew Davis and the performances by Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee Jones for sustaining crisp intelligence and a relentless pace.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Angie Errigo
85*

The critic hails it as far and away the most exciting adventure thriller of the year, packed with high-speed action, crisp dialogue and strong performances from Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee Jones. Director Andrew Davis is praised for handling the clever screenplay with imagination and urgency.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · John Ferguson
80

The big-screen adaptation improves on the source material. Harrison Ford is solid as the wrongly convicted surgeon, but Tommy Lee Jones steals the film with his Oscar-winning turn as the pursuing marshal, while director Andrew Davis keeps the suspense high with memorable set pieces like the train crash.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
9 August 1993 · Anthony Lane
75*

The review covers the 1993 film directed by Andrew Davis. The critic examines the thriller's chase dynamics and lead performances.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Fugitive worth watching?
The Fugitive is worth watching for anyone who wants a chase thriller that takes both the hunted man and his pursuer seriously, and we scored it 88. Harrison Ford supplies the worry and Tommy Lee Jones the dry humour, and Andrew Davis keeps the pursuit absorbing. Some of the action strains belief, so leave the survival questions until afterwards.
How long is The Fugitive, and what is it rated?
The Fugitive runs 2h 11m and is rated PG-13 by the MPA in the US. It is an action and thriller film.
Where can I watch The Fugitive in the US?
The Fugitive is streaming on Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $5.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The Fugitive, and is it suitable for children?
The Fugitive carries a UK 12 certificate, which suits teenagers and most older children but not the very young. It is built around a wrongful murder conviction and a sustained pursuit, and a train crash produces real alarm rather than cartoon spectacle. There is little in it to trouble the squeamish beyond that jolt.
How does The Fugitive compare to The 39 Steps?
The Fugitive is the heavier and more spectacular of the two, while The 39 Steps is the wittier and lighter. Both follow an innocent man on the run, but Hitchcock relies on Robert Donat's charm and Madeleine Carroll's resistance where Davis relies on Ford's strain and Jones's exactness. Choose Hitchcock for wit, Davis for a full evening of suspense.
What should I watch after The Fugitive?
After The Fugitive, try The 39 Steps (1935, Fi1m 88): For another innocent man in trouble, with more wit and less wreckage. Then Le Samouraï (1967, Fi1m 88): A cooler pursuit, with patient observation doing the work of frantic action; and A Hard Day (2014, Fi1m 79): A nastier thriller, with escalating trouble and an alarming appetite for complications.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1994

Nominated
Best Cinematography
Nominated
Best Film Editing
Nominated
Best Original Score
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Sound Editing
Won
Best Supporting Actor

If you liked this, try…

  1. The 39 Steps (1935, Fi1m 88)For another innocent man in trouble, with more wit and less wreckage.

  2. Le Samouraï (1967, Fi1m 88)A cooler pursuit, with patient observation doing the work of frantic action.

  3. The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (1974) · not reviewed yetProfessional competence, dry humour and a thriller’s proper respect for the clock.

  4. Tell No One (2006) · not reviewed yetAnother desperate search for answers, driven by grief and mounting suspicion.

  5. A Hard Day (2014, Fi1m 79)A nastier thriller, with escalating trouble and an alarming appetite for complications.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever