Kafka (Jeremy Irons) adjusting his collar between two men in bowler hats
Film review

Kafka

1991 · Directed by Steven Soderbergh · 1h 38m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceFranz Kafka investigates a murder, which is more initiative than he ever allowed his own clerks

Prague. Franz Kafka (Jeremy Irons) works by day as a clerk in an insurance office and writes at night, telling almost nobody. When a colleague is found dead and the police, in the person of Inspector Grubach (Armin Mueller-Stahl), seem content to call it suicide, the dead man’s lover Gabriela (Theresa Russell) refuses to accept it and draws Kafka towards a group who meet in secret and talk about the Castle above the city. At the office, the Chief Clerk (Alec Guinness) assigns him two assistants (Keith Allen, Simon McBurney) he did not ask for. Jeroen Krabbé plays his friend Bizzlebek; Ian Holm and Joel Grey are also in the cast. Steven Soderbergh directs, from a script by Lem Dobbs, in black and white.

Fi1m review

Steven Soderbergh’s second film borrows Kafka’s clerk, his Castle and his shadows for a mystery the writer would not have recognised. It is finely lit and well cast, and the story underneath is pulp; come for the look, not the dread.

Steven Soderbergh followed sex, lies, and videotape with this: a black-and-white mystery set in Prague, written by Lem Dobbs, in which Franz Kafka is not the author of The Trial but a character in something like it. Jeremy Irons plays him as a clerk at an insurance office who writes at night and would prefer nobody knew. A colleague is found dead, the police call it suicide, and the dead man’s lover Gabriela (Theresa Russell) insists otherwise. It is a bold thing to attempt for a second film. It is also, once you take the lighting away, a paperback thriller, and the lighting is most of what we would send you to see.

Walt Lloyd shoots the city in hard light and deep black, so that a lamp on a wet street throws one bright pool and everything past it is guesswork. Gavin Bocquet builds the office as ranks of desks under a high ceiling and a filing room where the shelves go up out of sight. Michael Jeffery puts everyone in stiff collars and dark coats that make the men look interchangeable, which is the point. When Kafka first stands at his desk and the only sound is a hundred pens, with Alec Guinness’s Chief Clerk coming down the aisle towards him, we felt a chill we had not expected from a film we had been told was a curiosity. Cliff Martinez keeps the score sparse and lets the scratching do the work.

Irons is good, and quietly so. His Kafka is polite, tired and cornered, a man who answers every question fully because he has never learned how not to. He is best when someone in authority is being kind to him and he cannot tell why. Guinness has only a handful of scenes and makes each one a small lesson in courteous menace. Armin Mueller-Stahl’s Inspector Grubach is the other pleasure, a policeman who listens more than he speaks and seems to have already read the report. Russell is less at home; Gabriela talks in slogans, and Russell delivers them as if she would rather not.

The plot is where it thins. Dobbs sends Kafka after a secret society, a conspiracy that reaches up to the Castle over the city, and the mechanics are those of a Saturday serial: a hidden entrance, a chase and a villain. Keith Allen and Simon McBurney play the two assistants the office assigns to Kafka as a music-hall double act, all synchronised nods and finished sentences. We laughed once and then wished them out of the building. The second half takes a turn we will not describe, into a kind of film we did not expect from the first half hour and did not much want, and the writer who gave us Josef K. becomes a man with a plan and a set of instructions.

That is the difficulty in one sentence: Kafka’s clerks never get anywhere near an answer, and this one is allowed to look for one. Orson Welles’s The Trial (1962) understood that the horror was in the not knowing and made itself hard to sit through on purpose. Soderbergh’s film is much easier company and much less troubling, and we suspect he knows it. He edits the picture himself, cleanly; at 98 minutes nothing dawdles once the first half hour is done, and there are worse things to be than a handsome pulp mystery that keeps its appointments.

See it if you want to watch a young director find out how much a camera and a city can do for him, and if Irons and Guinness in stiff collars sound like an evening. Do not come for Kafka; he has been borrowed for his name and his shadows and sent home before the interesting part. At home the black and white loses little, which is more than can be said for most films of its ambition.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

51
Positive
3
Mixed
1
Negative
3

The reviews split almost down the middle, and the split runs along a line of time. The American critics who saw it on release are cold. The New York Times calls the screenplay a mess while conceding Soderbergh’s direction is sound; the Los Angeles Times finds everything of interest on the surface and the plot beneath it trivial; Roger Ebert thinks a gifted director has chosen the wrong subject. Variety agrees the portrait of the artist is shallow and the story too conventional. Later British reviews are warmer. Empire, Time Out and Eye for Film all treat it as an entertaining, exaggerated mystery that borrows from Kafka’s fiction rather than a failed biopic, with Eye for Film singling out Jeremy Irons. Nearly everyone praises the look of the film and the staging. The reservations cluster on the script, a slow opening half hour, and whether the whole thing has anything to say about its subject.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
70*

The critic finds it surprisingly strong despite its reputation as a pretentious failure, praising its exaggerated, entertaining horror-movie take on Kafkaesque themes over a literal biopic.

Read the full review →
Time Out
4 April 2012 · TCh
70*

The film is an intriguing, idiosyncratic and often highly entertaining biopic that conflates elements of the author's life and writings into a fiction much bigger than life. It works as a genuinely eye-catching mystery thriller despite a sluggish first half hour and some misjudged absurdist comedy.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1990 · Variety Staff
45*

The story feels too conventional and the portrait of the artist too shallow; despite strong visuals and staging, the film is finally too normal.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
7 February 1992 · Roger Ebert
40*

Soderbergh reveals a gothic stylist but the project does not suit Kafka as subject or character. The director is gifted but unwise in his choice.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
4 December 1991 · Kenneth Turan
35*

A beautiful, confusing letdown with everything of interest in the gorgeous surface while the plot proves trivial and cheesy.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
4 December 1991 · Vincent Canby
30*

A very bad well-directed movie whose screenplay is a mess but whose handling by Soderbergh is not bad at all.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Kafka worth watching?
Kafka is worth watching for the look and the cast rather than the story, and we scored it 58. Walt Lloyd's black-and-white Prague and Jeremy Irons and Alec Guinness in stiff collars are the pleasures; the plot underneath is a paperback thriller with a secret society and a chase. See it as a young Soderbergh's exercise, not as a film about Kafka.
How long is Kafka, and what is it rated?
Kafka runs 1h 38m and is rated PG-13 by the MPA in the US. It is a drama and mystery film.
Where can I watch Kafka in the US?
Kafka is not on any streaming or rental service in the US at the moment. Availability is checked daily.
How does Kafka compare to The Third Man?
Kafka is the weaker film beside The Third Man, though both follow a man through a shadowed Central European city of unreliable friends. Carol Reed's mystery is gripping and funny, and Joseph Cotten's writer is worth caring about; Soderbergh's is finely lit and well acted but its conspiracy plot is pulp. Watch the Reed first, and this one for the look.
What should I watch after Kafka?
After Kafka, try The Third Man (1949, Fi1m 92): Another man lost in a Central European city of tilted shadows and lying friends. Then Brazil (1985, Fi1m 83): Paperwork as nightmare, played for laughs that stick in the throat; and Barton Fink (1991, Fi1m 83): A writer, a hotel and peeling wallpaper; the Coens’ idea of a working holiday.

Cast

Awards

Independent Spirit Awards, 1992

Nominated
Best Screenplay
Won
Best Cinematography

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Trial (1962) · not reviewed yetWelles does the same author properly, and makes sure you cannot get comfortable.

  2. The Third Man (1949, Fi1m 92)Another man lost in a Central European city of tilted shadows and lying friends.

  3. Brazil (1985, Fi1m 83)Paperwork as nightmare, played for laughs that stick in the throat.

  4. Barton Fink (1991, Fi1m 83)A writer, a hotel and peeling wallpaper; the Coens’ idea of a working holiday.

  5. The Element of Crime (1984, Fi1m 63)Von Trier’s sodium-lit detective story, if you want the mood without the plot.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever